Poll

| More

January 30 - February 3, 2017

Last month, a California court ruled that an employer could be held responsible for so-called "take-home" asbestos, which can allegedly sicken family members after staying on a worker's clothing. Should employers be on the hook for secondhand asbestos exposure?


Yes. Employers have long known the hazards of asbestos, and should have been providing better clean-up facilities and more regulation long ago.
Yes, but only in new cases moving forward. Employers simply weren't educated enough in decades past about the dangers of take-home asbestos.
No. Employees are responsible for what happens in their own homes.

Voting for this poll closed on Friday, February 3, 2017



Tagged categories: Asbestos; Health & Safety; Health and safety
   

View Results | Suggest a topic


Previous Polls from the Past Month

January 26 - February 2, 2017
SSPC 2017

January 23 - January 27, 2017
Mergers and acquisitions

January 23 - January 27, 2017
Hiring craft workers


More previous polls
Advertisements
 
SAFE Systems, Inc.

 
Abrasives Inc.

 
Sauereisen, Inc.

 
Strategic Materials Inc.

 
 
 

Technology Publishing Co., 1501 Reedsdale Street, Suite 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 15233

TEL 1-412-431-8300  • FAX  1-412-431-5428  •  EMAIL webmaster@paintsquare.com


The Technology Publishing Network

PaintSquare the Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings Paint BidTracker

 
EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About PaintSquare.com   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms & Conditions   |   Support   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us