Adjaye Answers Questions at Holocaust Memorial Inquiry


At a public inquiry into David Adjaye’s proposed U.K. Holocaust Memorial and Learning Center, the architect defended the decision to scale up the monument 23% from his original competition-winning design.

Opposition to both the size and location of the memorial also gave their arguments in the virtual session.

Project Background

The team of Adjaye (Adjaye Associates) and Ron Arad Architects was selected to design the memorial in October 2017 after the United Kington launched an international design competition that saw 92 entries.

According to officials, the 13-person jury chose the Adjaye project unanimously.

The original design featured 23 tall bronze fins with the 22 spaces in between them representing the 22 countries in which Jewish communities were devastated during the Holocaust.

But since then, the design has been met with strong criticism about its location, size and overall appearance.

Adjaye spoke to The Times about the location critique, noting that there are already two memorials in the park and stressing the importance of having the monument near Parliament.

Groups opposed to the decision, including the city’s Royal Parks Authority, claim that it will disrupt the garden.

In May 2019, design changes were made to the memorial. While the overall design with the bronze fins remained intact, a few tweaks were made to give the outer appearance some subtlety.

The revised design includes:

  • Changes to the entrance, making it lighter and more transparent;
  • Changes to the roofline to ensure better views across and around the structure; and
  • Changes to the courtyard to make the space more intuitive and inclusive.

The revisions reportedly also adjust construction and excavation to improve logistics on the site.

The monument originally had an estimated completion date of 2021, with a 100-million-pound (roughly $130 million) backing from the government.

In August, London Mayor Sadiq Kahn called on the Westminster City Council to approve the plans, which came a week after documents were uncovered that showed U.K. Holocaust Memorial Foundation co-chairs expressing misgivings about the planning process.

Moreover, some objectors to the memorial called the mayor’s words an interference of the democratic process.

Meanwhile, the Foundation co-chairs had written to the council looking at the weight that’s being given to the number of objections to the project—though, the project has also reportedly received thousands of comments in support.

Westminster Council leader Nickie Aiken had responded at the time saying that the application seemed to be heading to an “unfavorable recommendation.”

About two months after that comment, in November, the government decided that then-Housing Minister Esther McVey would decide whether plans for the memorial will move forward or not, not the Westminster council.

While the U.K. Holocaust Memorial Foundation asked for the move, others called the decision to put the scheme up for federal decision a “power grab” as the announcement was made close to Parliament’s general election, which took place in December.

The Review

That decision put into motion the public inquiry, which is still slated to be held and overseen by an independent planning inspector, which is then supposed to be reviewed by the Housing Secretary, who will make the final call on the project.

Westminster City Council confirmed its position of officially opposing the Memorial in February.

According to the Architect’s Journal, Jenrick’s call-in for the application happened within a month of him meeting with U.K. Holocaust Memorial Foundation board members, sparking more thoughts on “less than impartial behavior.”

Opposition to both the size and location of the memorial also gave their arguments in the virtual session.

Under planning rules, the housing secretary has a judicial role and is supposed to act “fairly and even-handedly.”

Jenrick has, in fact, recused himself from the ruling, however, which means that the final determination for the project falls to Pincher, the objectivity of whom was called into question.

In July the London Garden Trust applied for a review of Jenrick’s decision to allow his junior colleague, Housing Minister Christopher Pincher, to make the final decision on the application, which has been riddled with drama since its inception in 2017.

Campaigners were concerned that Pincher would be able to remain neutral on the application.

However, earlier this month the High Court ruled that the government had correctly handled the case.

What Now

At the inquiry, Adjaye (who was recently named the 2021 recipient of the Royal Gold Medal) was asked why the floor area of the proposed learning center had grown from 2,650 square meters to 3,258 square meters.

Adjaye said that as the project developed it became clear that more space was needed.

“I'm not disputing that it increased in size [but in terms of giving some context] I've never worked on a project where the area [as set in the brief] is that sacred,” he said. “Things grow as information is learned and that’s adjusted and reflected in the project.”

He said that he was surprised by some of the criticism and maintained that the group was excited about the concept of a memorial that was also an education center.

“I don’t know a single memorial in the whole world where that happens, and I don’t say that lightly, where you go through the memorial into a learning center, which I think is a very profound evolution of this way of understanding and memorializing education—both a memorial and a gateway to an illumination of information,” he said.

“We thought that was profound and a shift in the idea of memorials and one that made a lot of sense in the landscape. [This is what] good architects do: we rise to that challenge where we see that opportunity and we interpret it for the world that we live in.”

However, one of his critics who was there, Ruth Deech, a former governor of the BBC and a descendent of Holocaust victims, explained her objections to the project, mainly on the location.

“The decision to shoehorn this memorial and learning center into Victoria Tower Gardens means that nearly all of the objectives set out for it ... have not been met,” she said.

“The alleged public benefit is in part guesswork and in part a political decision unrelated to the benefit of the victims or their descendants.”


Tagged categories: Aesthetics; Architecture; EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa); EU; Good Technical Practice; Government; Public spaces

Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.