Coatings Industry News

Main News Page

$1.5B MO Airport Project Completion Date Set

Tuesday, December 15, 2020

Comment | More

Missouri’s $1.5 billion Kansas City International Airport project officially has its targeted completion date, according to Kansas City Mayor Quinton Lucas.

Reportedly, the Kansas City Aviation Department announced the day at a recent presentation to the City Council’s Transportation, Infrastructure and Operations Committee. The target date has been set for March 3, 2023, which grand opening celebrations to occur in the following weeks.

Also during the presentation, officials sought authorization for a contract with JBT AeroTech Corp. to build 39 glass boarding bridges at the airport. The move was unanimously approved.

Project Background: Initial Bidding

Back in 2017, developer Edgemoor was awarded the bid after nudging out firms AECOM, Jones Lang LaSalle and Burns & McDonnell.

In the beginning, some took issue with the project proposed as a no-bid contract by Burns & McDonnell, a local firm, leading to a public outcry when the bidding was opened up. In addition, several airlines that fly out of the airport came out in support of Burns & McDonnell, though they did add that they’d be willing to work with any of the four teams that had bid on the project.


Missouri’s $1.5 billion Kansas City International Airport project officially has its targeted completion date, according to Kansas City Mayor Quinton Lucas.

Another glitch was that the bidding process was handled differently by each company, with some releasing financial information and design renderings publicly. Others also publicly criticized the process.

According to the Kansas City Star, Karl Reichelt, an AECOM Capital senior manager, had said that the committee’s follow-up questions to bidders were “moving the goalposts” and allowing other competitors to alter proposals.

Burns & McDonnell held rallies and alleged conflict of interest, going so far as to say within recent weeks that the process should start over.

In the end, the selection committee said it recommended Edgemoor because of terminal project experience and finances, but also because the company kept a low profile.

The Developer Contract

Then, in December 2017, the Kansas City Council rejected the original memorandum of understanding with Edgemoor, with members posing concerns about the agreement’s vague terms and insufficient community benefits, as well as a questionable provision that put the city on the hook for up to $30 million, even if the deal never closes.

When it came to light that the council was questioning the MOU, AECOM and Burns & McDonnell announced that they had teamed up and were waiting to step in if the council decided to completely scrap the deal with Edgemoor.

However, the council and Edgemoor came to a revised agreement in February 2018, which included a more robust description of community benefits, such as free or subsidized transportation options and licensed child care for workers. It also added contributions to several charitable organizations, detailed an apprenticeship program and made commitments to hiring minority- and women-owned businesses.

Costs of the project had been rising since its inception, and in November 2018, officials released new estimates, putting the price of the project as a whole at nearly $2 billion, which includes about $400 million in finance costs.

Geoffrey Stricker, managing partner for terminal developer Edgemoor, told the Star at the time that the ballooning costs were because the airlines (who are financing the project) have requested four additional gates, more parking for airplanes and larger gate holding areas.

The End?

By the end of January in 2019, developer drama was still continuing, with three members of the council—Scott Wagner, Teresa Loar and Lee Barnes—reportedly asking a consortium, KCI Partnership, which was led by AECOM, for an updated financial proposal, highlighting how divided the council members were on the project in the first place.

AECOM claimed it could save the project $1.113 billion. The council did not entertain the idea of switching developers, however.

By March, a ceremony was held for the groundbreaking where the projected 1 million-square-foot project is expected to generate up to 5,000 jobs.

In August, Edgemoor, along with architect SOM, released updated renderings and a construction update. News outlet 41-KSHB Kansas City reported that more than 60 local firms—including 41 minority- or women-owned businesses—are on the docket to participate in the project. Many of those companies are listed on the expanded (Officials also note that the design will incorporate materials that are “unique to Kansas City,” and will include wood ceilings and stone walls.)

Hiring Talks

In early November, however, a statement released by the Kansas City Black Chamber demanded a review of contracting procedures and more oversight on the project, claiming that Edgemoor was lying about its numbers for contracts with companies owned by women and minorities.

At that time, there was a discrepancy on how to read the hiring data. The goals in the contract include that 15% of the construction work on the terminal is to go to subcontractors owned by women and 20% is to go to minority-owned firms.

The Chamber said that at the time, Edgemoor’s numbers were deficient; Edgemoor has challenged the Chamber’s math and cites the city’s Human Relations Department.

In November of last year, minority-owned firms up until that point had received $2.1 million for construction services and $4.7 million for professional services. For women, they’ve received a combined $4.8 million.

The Chamber is looking at the contract totals in relation to the total budget for the project, which would put the participation for minority-owned businesses at .32% for construction and 6.4% for professional services and women-owned businesses at .3% and 3.9%, respectively.

Edgemoor’s numbers, however, go by the budget that has been spent so far, not the total, which would then put minority-owned construction services at 19.5% and professional services at 16.9%, and women-owned construction services at 19.5% with professional services at 10.3%.

Edgemoor said that it expected to make up ground on the professional services figures over the next few months of design work.


Tagged categories: Airports; Contracts; Good Technical Practice; Mass transit; NA; North America; Ongoing projects

Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.

HoldTight Solutions Inc.


Paint BidTracker

NLB Corporation

Tarps manufacturing, Inc.

Strand’s Industrial Coatings


Technology Publishing Co., 1501 Reedsdale Street, Suite 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 15233

TEL 1-412-431-8300  • FAX  1-412-431-5428  •  EMAIL

The Technology Publishing Network

PaintSquare the Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings Paint BidTracker

EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms & Conditions   |   Support   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us