Coatings Industry News

Main News Page


Activists Appeal Line 3 Replacement Approval

Wednesday, August 15, 2018

Comment | More

A pair of environmental groups have gone to court to challenge the approval of Enbridge Energy’s Line 3 replacement project in Minnesota, arguing that the environmental impact statement approved this spring was insufficient.

The replacement of Line 3, a $6.5 billion project that’s the largest in the company’s history, is already underway in Canada, and had been approved in every necessary jurisdiction except Minnesota prior to this year. Minnesota’s Public Utilities Commission approved a certificate of need for the work unanimously, if somewhat reluctantly, in late June. The U.S. portion of the project is predicted to cost $2.9 billion and will take place primarily in Minnesota.

Line 3 replacement work in Canada
Premier of Alberta, CC BY-ND 2.0, via Flickr

The $6.5 billion Line 3 replacement project has been underway in Canada since 2016.

Line 3, which stretches from Alberta to Wisconsin, is reportedly at risk for corrosion and deterioration due to a disbonding tapecoat; its condition has led to a reduction in operating pressure and capacity. Enbridge argues that the entire pipeline must be replaced in order to ensure the line’s safety and to restore its original capacity of 760,000 barrels of oil per day—nearly twice what the line conveys currently.

Honor the Earth and Friends of the Headwaters filed an appeal of the PUC’s approval last week, according to the Twin Cities Pioneer Press. The two groups argue that the EIS for the project did not adequately account for potential spills and did not take into account a survey related to tribal matters. Some tribal leaders in Minnesota have expressed concerns about the possibility of the pipeline being routed on tribal lands.

Honor the Earth, which concerns itself with environmental issues vis a vis tribal lands, told the Pioneer Press the EIS was “long” but “shallow.” Enbridge officials countered that the permitting process was the “most extensive” for any pipeline in the history of the state.

   

Tagged categories: Government; Infrastructure; NA; North America; Oil and Gas; Pipelines; Program/Project Management

Comment from Michael Halliwell, (8/15/2018, 11:38 AM)

Hmmmm...something is fishy here. The company wants to replace the existing pipeline that is potentially corroding and deteriorating so it won't break and leak even if they run it at half the capacity it was supposed to have...but these groups don't want the potentially failing pipeline replaced because they think the new one might break and leak and it might, possibly, maybe have a slightly different route?


Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.


Advertisements
 
SAFE Systems, Inc.

 
Fischer Technology Inc.

 
DeFelsko Corporation

 
HoldTight Solutions Inc.

 
NLB Corporation

 
Modern Safety Techniques

 
ABKaelin, LLC

 
AWWA (American Water Works Association)

 
RCG America

 
Mitsubishi Gas Chemical America

 
 
 

Technology Publishing Co., 1501 Reedsdale Street, Suite 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 15233

TEL 1-412-431-8300  • FAX  1-412-431-5428  •  EMAIL webmaster@paintsquare.com


The Technology Publishing Network

PaintSquare the Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings Paint BidTracker

 
EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About PaintSquare.com   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms & Conditions   |   Support   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us