Coatings Industry News

Main News Page


Vancouver Pipeline Debate Intensifies as Deadline Nears

Thursday, May 10, 2018

Comment | More

Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson recently announced his doubts about Kinder Morgan Inc.’s pipeline expansion moving forward, as there is too much resistance “on the ground," yet the deadline for federal government involvement against those opposing the pipeline remains.

According to Bloomberg, Kinder Morgan recently threatened to step away from the C$7.4 billion ($5.7 billion) project. As a result, there is now a May 31 deadline for the federal government to eliminate opposition from the British Columbia government, which has vowed to use “every tool” to block the pipeline from going forward.

Pipeline Background

The Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion would, according to Kinder Morgan’s plans, run from Strathcona County, Alberta (near Edmonton), to a tanker port in Burnaby, British Columbia (near Vancouver), staying mostly alongside the current Trans Mountain Pipeline, built over 50 years ago.

Trans Mountain Pipeline/Kinder Morgan

Vancouver mayor Gregor Robertson recently announced his doubts about Kinder Morgan Inc.’s pipeline expansion moving forward, as there is too much resistance “on the ground," yet the deadline for federal government involvement against those opposing the pipeline remains.

The company noted that 73 percent of the pipeline would use the same right-of-way as the existing pipeline, 16 percent would follow other linear infrastructure rights-of-way, and 11 percent would require new right-of-way. The project involves 980 kilometers (609 miles) of new pipeline, and the reactivation of 193 kilometers of deactivated pipeline. It would expand the pipeline system's capacity from 300,000 to 890,000 barrels per day.

As of December 2017, Kinder Morgan anticipated the permitting process for its Trans Mountain expansion to take longer than originally expected, likely pushing back the oil pipeline’s completion until 2020.

Doubtful Future

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has pledged to see the pipeline completed, in order to help Canadian crude get to Asian markets. Trudeau did note that legislation to push the project forward remains an option, but he did not go into further detail. (Both Alberta and the federal government are considering supporting the project financially.)

Yet defiance in British Columbia does not show signs of relenting.

“I don’t think the resistance on the west coast is going to fade—I think it will only intensify," said Robertson. "Escalation looks likely."

For Robertson, the pipeline is also part of a larger question of transitioning away from fossil fuels. Currently, opposition is largely rooted in Vancouver and Victoria, British Columbia’s biggest cities.

   

Tagged categories: Government; Infrastructure; NA; North America; Oil and Gas; Pipelines; Program/Project Management

Comment from Alan Murray, (5/10/2018, 11:22 AM)

The latest available Transportation Panel Study for Vancouver (May 2015) conducted by CH2M Hill and based on a statistically representative sample of 2500, shows that even in a climate conducive to cycling and walking 71% of the populace uses automobiles (48%) and transit (23%) to move around. Irrespective of earning power access to vehicles in the two years 2103 -2014, has INCREASED from 72 to 75% . Figures that are hardly indicative of a population ":transitioning away from fossil fuels" Even the much touted renewable energy formats require a significant fossil fuelled energy input to their creation. Victoria continues to spew its raw sewage in the seaway. There are other examples of hypocrisy on a grand scale practiced by a vocal and largely misinfomed group of opponents to this pipeline.who lay claim to protecting the marine environment as if the industry was wilfully neglectful! .


Comment from peter gibson, (5/10/2018, 3:34 PM)

PC ,BC won't do what is good for the common good. More wind, and they would be all over it.


Comment from Michael Halliwell, (5/11/2018, 11:10 AM)

Also, don't forget that BC recently issued a discharge permit to Mount Polley Mining to discharge mine waste directly to the same lake they released 25 million liters of mine waste into when a tailings pond failed 3 years ago. And that, although BC is against additional tanker traffic, they are encouraging additional cruise ships (single hulled vessels, many discharging other pollutants) and LNG tankers (through approving new LNG projects) while barging fuel in from the US. In reality, the opposition to Kinder Morgan is political based on the minority government situation.


Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.


Advertisements
 
KTA-Tator, Inc. - Corporate Office

 
SAFE Systems, Inc.

 
HoldTight Solutions Inc.

 
DeFelsko Corporation

 
Sidewinder/Persyst Enterprises, Inc.

 
NLB Corporation

 
Sauereisen, Inc.

 
 
 

Technology Publishing Co., 1501 Reedsdale Street, Suite 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 15233

TEL 1-412-431-8300  • FAX  1-412-431-5428  •  EMAIL webmaster@paintsquare.com


The Technology Publishing Network

PaintSquare the Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings Paint BidTracker

 
EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About PaintSquare.com   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms & Conditions   |   Support   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us