Coatings Industry News

Main News Page

AkzoNobel Rejects Meeting Request, Backs Chair

Wednesday, April 26, 2017

Comment | More

Dutch coatings company AkzoNobel has officially declined a shareholder request for an Extraordinary General Meeting.

In a press release issued early Tuesday (April 25), the company detailed the review process under Dutch law noting that the supervisory board had taken “detailed legal advice” on the matter.

“AkzoNobel fully supports the rights that shareholders have under Dutch law,” the release read. “One of these rights is for shareholders representing at least 10 percent of issued share capital to request a general meeting as qualified by Dutch law. According to Dutch law, this includes meeting standards of reasonableness and fairness and a 'legitimate interest' test.”

Images: AkzoNobel

Dutch coatings company AkzoNobel has officially declined a shareholder request for an Extraordinary General Meeting.

On April 12, the company confirmed that they had received a request from shareholders, led by Elliott Advisors, to hold an EGM with the sole agenda item of dismissing Antony Burgmans as chairman of the supervisory board.

The board said Tuesday they found the request to dismiss Burgmans as “irresponsible, disproportionate, damaging and not in the best interests of the company.” Because that was the only reason for calling the meeting, the board denied the request, citing that there was no legal basis for an EGM.

Burgmans was first appointed to AkzoNobel's supervisor board in 2006. He is a former chairman of the Dutch-British consumer-goods giant Unilever NV.

"Following a thorough review and careful considering of this request the supervisory board reiterates its unanimous support for Mr. Burgmans in his role as chairman,” said Deputy Chairman Byron Grote. “His unique experience in international business and global transactions is crucial to the company. He has played an important role in overseeing and supporting management in the transformation of the company in recent years, contributing to its significantly improved performance. It is essential that the steady and experienced hand of the supervisory board and its chairman remains focused on the task of steering the company at this crucial time."


When the EGM request was first received, AkzoNobel immediately came to Burgmans’ defense, predicting that the proposed meeting would be rejected. The company also questioned the relationship between Elliott Advisors and rival company Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania-based PPG Industries, which has been lobbying to acquire AkzoNobel for weeks (the most recent offer was made public on Monday, April 24).

PPG extended its third offer to combine companies in the form of a letter to AkzoNobel CEO Ton Büchner (left) and Supervisory Board Chair Antony Burgmans.

AkzoNobel alleged that the shareholders had “intended to privately share potentially price-sensitive information with PPG” about the meeting request, and asked Elliott Advisors to clarify its relationship with PPG.

PPG, meanwhile, had fired back with its own statement, saying, “There has not been any, and there are currently no agreements or arrangements, in whatever form, between PPG and Elliott Advisors.”

Shareholder Support

AkzoNobel stressed Tuesday that it “strongly respects and greatly values its shareholders and regularly engages in an open and direct dialogue,” and added that within the last week the company held multiple meetings with shareholders in light of an investor day, shareholder roadshow and the company’s annual general meeting, held Tuesday.

In a subsequent release solely on the general meeting, AkzoNobel said that shareholders voted in favor of all resolutions, including adopting the company’s 2016 financial statements.

"Today shows strong support from shareholders for all resolutions the company brought forward and reinforces our belief in the strong platform for growth and momentum the company achieved in 2016,” said Burgmans.


Tagged categories: AkzoNobel; Asia Pacific; Business management; Business matters; Business operations; EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa); Good Technical Practice; Latin America; North America; Personnel; PPG

Comment from Jesse Melton, (4/26/2017, 7:36 AM)

Good for them. Shareholder intervention in company operations is almost always a bad thing. It's definitely bad for everyone except the interventionists.

Shareholder activism is a cowardly thing. If they were truly committed to changing the company they need to pony up the cash necessary to select Board Members. Anything less just indicates they don't have enough confidence in their plans for the company.

Comment from Zenith Czora, (4/29/2017, 12:17 AM)

It is a good thing. AkzoNobel does not need to merge with other companies. their own range of products consists of well known and trusted brands . their brandnames sell by themselves. Merging all big companies becomes a monopoly and lessen the competition within the market and job opportunities are becoming less. I believe that Akzo Nobel will maintain their rank as one of the top 5 paint companies.

Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.

Axxiom Manufacturing

Abrasives Inc.

GMA Garnet USA

HoldTight Solutions Inc.


KTA-Tator, Inc. - Corporate Office

Sauereisen, Inc.

Tarps manufacturing, Inc.


Technology Publishing Co., 1501 Reedsdale Street, Suite 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 15233

TEL 1-412-431-8300  • FAX  1-412-431-5428  •  EMAIL

The Technology Publishing Network

PaintSquare the Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings Paint BidTracker

EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms & Conditions   |   Support   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us