Coatings Industry News

Main News Page


Report: EPA Failed to Act Swiftly on Flint

Monday, October 24, 2016

Comment | More

An internal investigation has concluded that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency should have acted months earlier to warn residents of Flint, MI, of lead contamination in their drinking water.

In a report issued Thursday (Oct. 20), EPA Inspector General Arthur Elkins says that EPA Region 5, which includes Michigan and other states in the Upper Midwest, “had the authority and sufficient information” to issue an emergency order in the Flint contamination matter as early as June 2015.

Flint water tower
© iStock.com / LindaParton

A new report from the EPA's inspector general concludes that the agency had the authority and information to issue an emergency order regarding Flint's drinking water crisis in June 2015 but failed to do so for seven months.

The agency’s emergency order was not issued until Jan. 21, 2016.

Jurisdictional Confusion

The report explains that EPA officials believed that the state of Michigan had jurisdictional power that precluded the federal agency from issuing the order, known as a Safe Drinking Water Act Section 1431 emergency order. But the inspector general’s office concludes that the EPA does have the power to issue such an order if a state’s action on the issue are deemed insufficient.

The report also reveals that EPA Region 5 briefed the agency’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance in September 2015, at which time that national office recommended an emergency order be issued. Region 5 officials maintained that state authorities were addressing the matter, and declined to have OECA issue the order.

SDWA Section 1431 applies to situations “where there may be an imminent and substantial endangerment” to citizens’ health. It allows the EPA to take any action necessary to protect human health if it finds that a contaminant is present in or likely to enter the drinking water supply.

State vs. Federal Responsibility

Most states, including Michigan, have “primacy” to implement the SDWA, according to the EPA. That means state officials are responsible for SDWA-related matters. However, as the report notes, the EPA reserves the authority to supersede the states in issuing an emergency order in some situations, including when “the appropriate state and local authorities have not acted to protect human health.”

Flint River
By Andrew Jameson / CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons

Flint switched from Detroit's water supply to the Flint River in April 2014.

Flint’s drinking water crisis began in April 2014, when the city chose to switch its water source from Detroit’s water supply to the Flint River as an interim solution while a pipeline to carry water from Lake Huron to the communities of the newly formed Karegnondi Water Authority was being built. Flint is part of a three-county area that voted in 2010 to leave Detroit’s water supply and form the KWA.

Water from the Flint River was not treated with anticorrosive agents, and began to corrode the city’s aging pipes. Drinking water in many homes was contaminated with lead, leading to a public health crisis.

State and Local Deception

According to the inspector general’s report, EPA Region 5 knew in April 2015 that proper corrosion control was not in place in Flint’s system, despite state officials having claimed otherwise months prior. Three state and local officials were charged with misconduct and other violations in relation to misleading statements made to the EPA and other authorities.

On June 25, 2015, the report says, a Region 5 official produced a report outlining lead contamination in Flint homes and the public health issues that the contamination precipitated. But the office did not issue a Section 1431 emergency order because it believed the actions the state was taking in the matter “were a jurisdictional bar preventing the EPA” from doing so.

Drinking water from tap
U.S. EPA

The Safe Drinking Water Act allows the EPA to take any action necessary to protect human health if it finds that a contaminant is present in or likely to enter the drinking water supply.

The inspector general’s report recommends the EPA update its guidance on Section 1431, providing examples of emergency order situations, and examples of what would be considered a proper response by state and local authorities. The office also calls on the agency to train all relevant personnel on Section 1431 and its updated guidance.

Flint Progress

Flint has been back on Detroit's water supply since October 2015. As recently as August 2016, 10 percent of homes in "high risk" part of the city were found to have lead levels higher than the federal maximum of 15 parts per billion.

Last month, the U.S. Senate passed a water infrastructure bill that would direct hundreds of millions of dollars to municipalities like Flint to update old pipeline systems. That bill has not yet passed the House of Representatives, and reports indicate that the Flint funding could be cut in a House version of the legislation.

Flint officials voted in June to remain with the KWA, after a period in which Mayor Karen Weaver indicated that the city could leave the nascent authority. Updates to the KWA infrastructure plans were made because Flint must stay on Detroit’s water supply until the switchover is made; the previous plan had involved repurposing the pipeline that brings water from Detroit to Flint as part of the KWA line.

   

Tagged categories: Corrosion; Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); Health & Safety; Health and safety; Lead; North America; Pipeline; potable water

Comment from Car F., (10/24/2016, 11:29 AM)

The system is rigged against regular citizens who are forced to buy bottled water or face lead poisoning. Where are the judicial indictments, the Grand Juries, the pious media condemnations? How is the future health of these citizens being look after? Who will pay to look after the birth defects and the catastrophic illnesses resulting from lead poisoning? Indeed, the system is rigged against regular citizens


Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.


Advertisements
 
KTA-Tator, Inc. - Corporate Office

 
Fischer Technology Inc.

 
ABKaelin, LLC

 
Modern Safety Techniques

 
SAFE Systems, Inc.

 
WEFTEC Show

 
NLB Corporation

 
Sauereisen, Inc.

 
 
 

Technology Publishing Co., 1501 Reedsdale Street, Suite 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 15233

TEL 1-412-431-8300  • FAX  1-412-431-5428  •  EMAIL webmaster@paintsquare.com


The Technology Publishing Network

PaintSquare the Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings Paint BidTracker

 
EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About PaintSquare.com   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms & Conditions   |   Support   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us