Coatings Industry News

Main News Page


Feds Intervene in Defective Rebar Suit

Friday, September 30, 2016

Comment | More

The U.S. government has decided to join in a whistleblower lawsuit claiming a global supplier to the nuclear power industry defrauded the government.

The Department of Justice announced it has intervened in a False Claims Act lawsuit against Energy & Process Corporation (E&P), of Tucker, GA, alleging that E&P knowingly failed to perform required quality assurance procedures and supplied defective steel reinforcing bars (rebar) related to a contract to construct a Department of Energy (DOE) nuclear waste treatment facility.

“In intervening in this lawsuit, the U.S. Attorney’s Office seeks to ensure that entities that defraud the government are identified and held responsible,” said U.S. Attorney John Horn of the Northern District of Georgia.

DOJ Seal
Department of Justice / Public Domain via Wikimedia Commons
 

The complaint against E&P claims that the DOE had paid a premium in the millions of dollars for the company to supply rebar that met stringent regulatory standards for construction of the Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication and Reactor Irradiation Services facility at the DOE’s Savannah River site, near Aiken, SC.

However, E&P allegedly failed to perform most of the necessary quality assurance measures, while falsely certifying that those requirements had been met. Moreover, the suit further alleges that one-third of the rebar supplied by E&P and used in the construction was found to be defective.

Fraudulent Certification, Invoices

According to the complaint, the facility’s thick concrete walls, intended to prevent radioactive material from being released into the environment, were among its critical safety features. The concrete walls were to be strengthened with rebar of very specific dimensions and tensile strength to enhance the strength of the walls.

Because the rebar was considered a “basic component” of the construction, it was required to be manufactured and supplied according specifications meeting the Nuclear Quality Assurance-1 (NQA-1) regulatory standard maintained by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers and endorsed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Commercial-grade rebar was not considered suitable for use for the MOX facility.

However, the complaint claims that E&P simply purchased commercial grade rebar from a third-party supplier and had it shipped directly to the MOX facility, “without the required and vital quality assurance work ever having being performed.”

As part of its scheme, E&P reportedly sent a "Certification of Conformance/Compliance" with each shipment of rebar, which “explicitly and falsely” certified that the rebar complied with the quality assurance requirements.

steel rods to reinforce concrete
© iStock.com / peangdao
 

Meanwhile, E&P billed the agency millions of dollars for material the company certified was NQA-1 rebar. At the time, the price of commercial-grade rebar was approximately $750 per ton, the complaint notes, but the federal government paid E&P about $3,400 per ton for rebar that E&P promised would be NQA-1 Rebar.

The sixteen invoices E&P sent for payment for the rebar were also considered to be “false and/or fraudulent because the required quality assurance work had not been performed,” the complaint indicated.

“E&P's scheme was particularly egregious in that, had it not been discovered, it could have subjected the public to the serious and long lasting risks associated with radiological contamination,” the complaint read.

However, the fraud was uncovered when the prime contractor discovered serious defects in some of the rebar supplied by E&P when it began installation. This led the prime contractor to investigate and discover that E&P had not performed the required quality assurance work, according to the court document

Investigation and Suit

“The Department of Justice is committed to ensuring that construction suppliers who are paid a premium to meet high safety standards actually supply the goods and perform the work for which they are paid,” said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Benjamin C. Mizer, head of the Justice Department’s Civil Division.

“When contractors cut corners, they not only cheat American taxpayers, but they also can put public safety at risk, particularly when their misconduct affects a facility that houses and processes nuclear materials,” he added.

The lawsuit was filed by Deborah Cook, a former employee of the prime contractor building the DOE facility, under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the False Claims Act.

Under the act, private citizens can bring suit on behalf of the government for false claims and share in any recovery. The act permits the government to intervene in such lawsuits, as it has done in this case. Defendants found liable under the act are subject to three times the damages and penalties.

According to Schleier Law Offices, the government intervenes in only a small percentage of qui tam cases, but when it does, chance of success greatly increases.

This matter was investigated by the Civil Division’s Commercial Litigation Branch, the U.S. Attorney’s Offices of the Northern District of Georgia and the District of South Carolina, and the DOE’s Office of Inspector General.

The claims asserted against E&P are allegations only, and there has been no determination of liability.

   

Tagged categories: Construction; Fraud; Lawsuits; North America; Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC); Program/Project Management; Rebar; U.S. Department of Energy; Waste Processing Plant; Whistle blowing

Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.


Advertisements
 
KTA-Tator, Inc. - Corporate Office

 
Fischer Technology Inc.

 
SAFE Systems, Inc.

 
DeFelsko Corporation

 
Sauereisen, Inc.

 
HoldTight Solutions Inc.

 
ABKaelin, LLC

 
Tarps manufacturing, Inc.

 
NLB Corporation

 
Modern Safety Techniques

 
 
 

Technology Publishing Co., 1501 Reedsdale Street, Suite 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 15233

TEL 1-412-431-8300  • FAX  1-412-431-5428  •  EMAIL webmaster@paintsquare.com


The Technology Publishing Network

PaintSquare the Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings Paint BidTracker

 
EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About PaintSquare.com   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms & Conditions   |   Support   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us