Follow us on Twitter Follow us on LinkedIn Like us on Facebook Follow us on Instagram Visit the TPC Store
Search the site



Safway Services

Coatings Industry News

Main News Page

‘Big 3’ Continue Financial Struggles

Monday, November 2, 2015

Comment | More

Hampered by cancelled orders and delays in construction of offshore facilities, the world’s three largest shipbuilders are tracking to record major financial losses in 2015.

To date, South Korea’s “Big 3”—Hyundai Heavy Industries, Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering Co. and Samsung Heavy Industries—show a combined loss of 8 trillion won (US$7 billion), Hellenic Shipping News Worldwide reported Thursday (Oct. 29). / junak
© / junak

Through the third quarter, the 'Big 3' South Korean shipbuilders are showing a combined loss of 8 trillion won (US$7.8 billion), reports say.

The news should not have been unexpected, as the three shipyards reported massive losses in the second quarter. The 4.8 trillion-won (US$4.1 billion) combined loss reported in July was worse than anticipated by analysts and a historic worst for South Korea’s shipbuilding industry.

However, an earlier (Oct. 27) report from Hellenic Shipping News indicated that analysts were expecting that earnings before interest and tax at Hyundai Heavy would be positive in the third quarter.

According to recent reports, Hyundai Heavy has recorded 3.24 trillion won (US$2.83 billion) in losses, largely from offshore projects, Daewoo Shipbuilding has lost 3 trillion won (US$2.63 billion) and Samsung Heavy has lost 2 trillion won (US$1.75 billion) over the year.

While most of the shipyards’ losses are attributed to offshore facility projects in play since 2010, the delivery of underpriced ships, a rise in shipbuilding costs and increased costs stemming from delayed construction off offshore projects also contribute to the financial hurt.

Losses for the year are expected to reach 10 trillion won (US$8.76 billion).

Heaviest Losses

According to BloombergBusiness, Hyundai Heavy Industries was hit the hardest during the third quarter, showing a 434.1 billion won (US$380 million) net loss. The reported operating loss was 678 billion won (US$593.7 million).

These losses far exceeded those that analysts had originally estimated the company would experience. Those estimates had forecast a 61 billion-won (US$53.4 million) net loss and a 14.6 billion-won (US$12.8 million) operating loss.

This will be the company’s second consecutive year posting a loss. Hyundai Heavy had shown a net profit of 146.3 billion won (US$128.1 million) in 2013, before beginning a slide with a 2.20 trillion won (US$1.93 billion) net loss in 2014. Its operating profit in 2013 was 802 billion won (US$702.2 million), before suffering its largest-ever operating loss of 3.25 trillion won (US$2.85 billion) in 2014.

The company pointed to a canceled semi-submersible rig order, the termination of a renewable-energy venture and a drop in oil prices as contributing to these losses.

Signs of Improvement

Samsung Heavy, however, logged a net profit of 51 billion won (US$44.7 million) during the third quarter, besting analysts’ estimates, according to reports. The company indicated the profit partially resulted from a client payment following requested changes to an Australian offshore project.

Additionally, if it succeeds in a planned merger with its Samsung Engineering affiliate, that may also lift the shipyard’s financial standing, reports said. / PhilAugustavo
© / Phil Augustavo

While most of the shipyards’ losses are attributed to offshore facility projects, the delivery of underpriced ships, a rise in shipbuilding costs and increased costs from delayed construction also contribute to the financial hurt.

Still, according to Park Moo Hyun, a Hana Daetoo Securities Co. analyst, “Investors are hoping that Samsung Heavy’s profit signals a turnaround for shipbuilders.

“But they’re forgetting that a large part of the problem the shipyards face is not making deliveries on time, and if more projects are delayed then this may not be the end of losses for their offshore businesses.”

The company was negatively affected by a customer’s request in August to defer delivery of several drill ships, BloombergBusiness added.

Potential Bailout

Daewoo Shipbuilding, too, is expected to be back on the profit side by the first quarter of 2016. The company is reportedly in talks with its creditors that may lead to a financial bailout.

At this time, Bloomberg reported, the anticipated infusion of as much as 4 trillion (US$3.5 billion) won was halted as a result of criticism of the taxpayer-funded bailout.

Project delays are said to have forced the shipbuilder to take on more debt. In an effort to raise money to keep afloat, the company is selling non-core assets (including its headquarters building, a golf course and wind energy business), reducing its operational presence at an underperforming Romanian shipyard and reducing its workforce.

“Daewoo Shipbuilding appears to be getting over its biggest challenge,” Lee Jae Won, an analyst at Yuanta Securities, told BloombergBusiness. “The real task for the shipyard will be to meet its reform plans. Fourth quarter earnings could be far better than the third quarter’s.”

The Big Picture

According to reports, with falling oil prices and oil and gas producers cutting costs, the shipyards should not expect to bring in many new orders for the time being.

“The biggest reason why shipbuilders are struggling is because of the delays in offshore rig projects, and until the deliveries are made, these projects will continue to weigh on the shipbuilders’ profit,” Park Moo Hyun said.

“Although it’s difficult to say when the companies will be able to turn to profit, I think it will take at least another year for them to recover from the aftermath.”


Tagged categories: Business conditions; Business operations; Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering Co.; Earnings reports; Finance; Hyundai Heavy Industries Co.; Samsung Heavy Industries Co.; Shipyards

Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.

SAFE Systems, Inc.
Portable Dust Collectors for Tough Environments
Trailer and skid-mounted models in numerous sizes, powered by electric and/or diesel. Sloped roofs, multiple dust inlets, high static, dampered fans. Lockable power & drive compartments.

SABRE Autonomous Solutions
Imagine being able to remove the operator from the blasting environment
This significantly reduces workers exposure to hazards like toxic dust, noise, and repetitive motion injuries.

Tarps manufacturing, Inc.
QUALITY MADE IN AMERICA —Available near you!
CLICK to get a behind-the-scenes look at how Tarps Manufacturing makes the highest-quality tarps right here in the USA — available nationwide.

HoldTight Solutions Inc.
Clean surfaces simply don’t rust, and no other product cleans like HoldTight®102.
HoldTight®102 is a wet blasting additive that decreases the water’s surface tension, allowing it to get into the profile of the surface and remove ALL contamination, including salts, acids, abrasives, light oils, and greases. HoldTight®102 leaves behind no film and evaporates with the water, providing a surface that is thoroughly clean and ready for coating, rust-free for up to 72 hours.

Fischer Technology Inc.
DUALSCOPE®FMP100 with DataCenter IP
Transfer customized inspection plans from PC to FMP100 using step-by-step guidance with prompts and pictures throughout the measurement procedure

Modern Safety Techniques
Modern Safety Techniques
With our unique LTCat, we can help to provide clean, safe breathing air to your workers. Take a look at our Breathing Air Systems, we supply at least twice as much charcoal as our competitors! Modern

KTA-Tator, Inc. - Corporate Office
KTA-Tator EH&S Services
• Ambient & Worker Exposure Air Monitoring
• Safety & Health Program Development
• Lead Paint Assessments
& Specifications
• Health Hazard & Jobsite Safety Assessments
Call 1-800-532-3633

US Minerals
Blast with the bestHit Harder. Clean Faster.
Learn more at


Technology Publishing Co., 1501 Reedsdale Street, Suite 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 15233

TEL 1-412-431-8300  • FAX  1-412-431-5428  •  EMAIL

The Technology Publishing Network

Durability + Design PaintSquare the Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings Paint BidTracker

EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms & Conditions   |   Support   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us