Coatings Industry News

Main News Page


Keystone XL in Limbo after Veto

Thursday, February 26, 2015

Comment | More

TransCanada's proposed 1,700-mile oil pipeline from Alberta to the Gulf Coast is back on indefinite hold in the wake of a rare presidential veto on Tuesday (Feb. 24).

For only the third time in his presidency, President Obama used his veto authority to block a Republican bill that would have advanced the seven-year-old pipeline proposal.

Obama had warned Congress that he would veto such a measure, and he did so within hours of it landing on his desk.

TransCanada
TransCanada

Pipeline owner TransCanada says the project will create or support more than 40,000 jobs.

In his veto message to the Senate, the President accused Congress of attempting "to circumvent longstanding and proven processes for determining whether or not building and operating a cross-border pipeline serves the national interest."

Reviews and Reports

The pipeline proposal remains before the U.S. State Department, which has already completed four reviews of the project—including, most recently, an 11-volume Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement in January 2014 that found no significant impact by the $7.6 billion project.

That State Department analysis incorporated nearly two million comments but triggered about 2.5 million more, which the agency now says must be reviewed. Meanwhile, litigation has been underway over the pipeline's proposed route through Nebraska.

SFEIS
U.S. State Department

The U.S. State Department is reviewing the project again. The agency's 11-volume Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement in January 2014 found no major environmental concerns.

Secretary of State John Kerry said this week that he had no idea when his department would complete its current review and send its recommendation on the project to Obama.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, which also has a role in the project, has ripped the State Department's analyses of the project as inadequate. Nearly two years ago, EPA requested a variety of additional studies into the pipeline's environmental impact.

Conditions and Permits

The Keystone Gulf Coast Expansion Project would carry up to 830,000 barrels of oil sands crude (also known as tar sands crude) from Canada to Texas for refining. The 875-mile segment of line from Alberta to Steele City, NE, requires a Presidential Permit to cross the U.S.-Canadian border.

The pipeline's bipartisan backers say the project has been exhaustively evaluated and would provide jobs and energy security.

Pipeline owner TransCanada has accepted dozens of federal conditions attached to the project and has rerouted the line away from the most environmentally sensitive areas.

KeystoneXLMap
U.S. State Department

The pipeline's cross-border northern leg has been rerouted to address environmental concerns, but litigation still surrounds the project's course through Nebraska.

Environmentalists and other critics call the project both unnecessary and environmentally risky. The system would carry tar-sands crude, which is heavier and more corrosive than regular "sweet" crude.

Project foes also question TransCanada's operating record. The first 1,300 miles of the Keystone system saw 14 leaks and spills in the first 14 months of operation.

Security Shortcuts

The Keystone XL veto was Obama's first in five years and only the third of his presidency. (Only Millard Fillmore and James Garfield used fewer vetoes, and Garfield died after a month in office.)

"The Presidential power to veto legislation is one I take seriously," Obama's message said. "But I also take seriously my responsibility to the American people.

PresObama
Official White House photo / Pete Souza

President Obama vetoed said the Keystone bill circumvented the process for determining whether a cross-border pipeline served the national interest.

"And because this act of Congress conflicts with established executive branch procedures and cuts short thorough consideration of issues that could bear on our national interest—including our security, safety, and environment—it has earned my veto."

Jeers and Cheers

Reaction to the veto came swiftly.

TransCanada Chief Executive Russ Girling said in a statement that the company remained “fully committed” to Keystone XL, despite the veto. Girling said the project would be "the safest pipeline ever built in America."

House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) called the President's action "a national embarrassment."

Boehner said Obama was "too invested in left-fringe politics" to "put the national interest first" and called the President "too close to environmental extremists to stand up for America's workers."

KeystoneXLProtest
Grist.org

Critics of the pipeline took their opposition to the White House in 2011, stalling the project then.

Canadian officials, who also support the pipeline, were resolute. “It is not a question of if this project will be approved; it is a matter of when,” Canadian Natural Resources Minister Greg Rickford said in a statement.

Praise came from environmentalists and some Democrats in Congress.

Sen. Edward J. Markey (D-MA) said in a statement that the pipeline was "not in America's national interest."

Markey added: "We should not help some of the dirtiest oil in the world to be funneled through our country like a straw, just so much of it can be exported to foreign nations.

"That is a bad deal for our country, and a dangerous proposition for our climate.”

Override Attempt

Republicans immediately said they would attempt to override the President's veto by March 3, but an override is considered unlikely, despite Republican majorities in both chambers of Congress.

SpeakerJohnBoehner SenEdwardMarkey
Official photos

House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH), left, called the President's Keystone XL veto "a national embarrassment." Sen. Edward Markey (D-MA), right, countered that the pipeline project was "a bad deal for our country."

An override would require about 20 more Democratic votes in the house and four in the Senate, based on the congressional votes last month, politico.com reported.

Still, the effort is afoot.

"...[W]e are not going to give up in our efforts to get this pipeline built," said Boehner. "Not even close."

   

Tagged categories: Government; Government contracts; North America; Oil and Gas; Pipelines; President Obama; Program/Project Management; Project Management

Comment from Stephen Mellon, (2/26/2015, 10:52 AM)

A lot of jobs have been lost do to this Veto!!!!!! What a shame!!!


Comment from Jim Johnson, (2/26/2015, 1:01 PM)

One could always do what is right for the people and do as the president does and ignore the veto and go ahead and build it. If some judge orders a halt, again do as the president does and ignore him and keep on building. Then continue doing as the president does and ignore anyone and anything and continue building until it is done and refuse to comply with any court order or anyone and just carry on as if all is normal. We know it would not be normal, but if the president can ignore the law then why can't we? He certainly is not royalty or better than anyone else so why can't we do as he does? We need the energy independence and we need the jobs, so why not just do it?


Comment from Gerald Burbank, (2/27/2015, 9:31 AM)

Although I may not necessarily agree with the president, vetoing a bill isn't illegal. There are three branches of government and each has its own protocol. The veto is the president's progative. The congress can over ride it if they have the votes. I'm also not sure allowing a Canadian company to transport their oil through the U.S. will increase our energy independence. Or land will simply serve as the route to the market. If any money from the treasury is involved, why not invest in our aging infrastructure? It wouldn't take much to produce 40,000 jobs if we'd put money where it's needed instead of spending on every special interest in the world.


Comment from Mark Bowen, (2/27/2015, 2:22 PM)

How can someone who allows every illegal alien to cross our southern border say that he's concerned about our "security"?


Comment from Billy Russell, (2/28/2015, 6:22 AM)

This Administration's actions are the most incompetent example in our Nation's History of a functioning Government, Oil & Gas industry invests more money towards corrosion prevention than any aspect of our infrastructure , getting politicians involved is a clear example of the current state of our Bridges , water Treatment and Highways/Bridges, "JOB'S is what this country needs not more EBT cards, that's in our National security Best interest, this Administration couldn't operate a Kool Aid stand correctly.


Comment from Chuck Pease, (3/3/2015, 4:24 PM)

On the fence on this one. My question is this. And do pipe in if you have the answer. I get the jobs thing. Good stuff we need more jobs. With TransCanada being the builder and owner I assume, what then after processing happens to the end product? Sold to China? or sent back to Canada??? In a nut shell other than temporary construction jobs, and the few permanent support and operating jobs to maintain the pipeline, will America see any of the end product, are you with me on this???


Comment from M. Halliwell, (3/5/2015, 11:40 AM)

Chuck, I can add a bit, but not fully answer your question. My understanding is that the oil will be refined in at the end of pipe in the US. As for the final products, I suppose they could be loaded into ships (for transport along either US coast or for export) or put in the US domestic pipelines coming out of the gulf states for distribution. I don't know for sure about the final destination of the refined products, but there will be ongoing refining jobs in the US as well.


Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.


Advertisements
 
DeFelsko Corporation

 
KTA-Tator, Inc. - Corporate Office

 
SAFE Systems, Inc.

 
Sauereisen, Inc.

 
Tarps manufacturing, Inc.

 
Strategic Materials Inc.

 
WEFTEC Show

 
 
 

Technology Publishing Co., 1501 Reedsdale Street, Suite 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 15233

TEL 1-412-431-8300  • FAX  1-412-431-5428  •  EMAIL webmaster@paintsquare.com


The Technology Publishing Network

PaintSquare the Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings Paint BidTracker

 
EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About PaintSquare.com   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms & Conditions   |   Support   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us