Coatings Industry News

Main News Page


Engineers Design Quake-Resistant Home

Thursday, November 20, 2014

Comment | More

A team of Stanford University engineers says it has designed, constructed and tested an earthquake-resistant house that may render residential earthquake insurance obsolete.

The house is capable of withstanding a quake with three times the power of the destructive 1989 Loma Prieta temblor, which measured at 6.9 magnitude on the Richter Scale, Stanford University reported in an announcement on the research.

test house
Screen grab via YouTube / Stanford University

Engineers have built and tested a three-bedroom house that can survive major California quakes.

The house is equipped with inexpensive design modifications, including reinforced walls and sliding isolators that allow the structure to skate along the trembling ground instead of collapsing, said project leader Gregory Deierlein, Stanford’s John A. Blume Professor in the School of Engineering.

These modifications could be incorporated into new homes as soon as designers and builders decide to use them, the team says. The technology may also lead to building code changes.

The Toll on Homes

“Residential homes already do a good job of keeping the people inside safe when a temblor hits,” according to the university. However, seismic activity typically does a lot of minor structural damage.

For example, after the 1994 Northridge quake, most of the $25.6 billion repair tab was spent on fixes to 500,000 residential structures, the university noted.

Even if the walls of a home stay up in a quake, interior drywall and stucco, as well as cabinetry and other architectural fixtures are often damaged because of the violent sideways movements, Deierlein said.

Seismic Isolation

In lieu of a conventional foundation, the new structure rests on a dozen steel and plastic sliders that measure 4.5 inches in diameter, according the announcement.

Under the sliders are plates or bowl-shaped dishes made of galvanized steel. The dishes are known as “seismic isolators.”

“The idea of seismic isolation is to isolate the house from the vibration of the ground,” said Eduardo Miranda, an associate professor of civil and environmental engineering. “When the ground is moving, the house will just slide.”

Similar units are already in play, protecting large structures like San Francisco City Hall and structures at San Francisco International Airport, but they are expensive, Deierlein said.

His team adapted the technology for residential use by incorporating inexpensive materials into the scaled-down isolators.

Sturdy Walls

The home also features a “unibody design,” a term borrowed from the automobile industry, in which every element of the structure contributes to its strength, according to the university.

Unlike typical construction, where drywall is screwed into the wood framing, the team used glue to affix 5/8-inch-thick drywall more securely to the framing.

On the exterior, they used strong mesh and additional screws to attach the white stucco tightly, the team noted.

These elements reportedly made the house stiffer and stronger, leading to a significantly better seismic performance.

Testing

The team tested the three-bedroom, 36-by-22-foot house using the largest earthquake simulator in the country, the Large High Performance Outdoor Shake Table at the University of California, San Diego.

The facility uses computer-controlled hydraulic pistons to move the platform back and forth in a pattern selected by the engineers, so it can mimic specific earthquakes like the Loma Prieta.

It took the team seven weeks to build the boxy test structure. Testing was executed in September.

usgs
USGS

The team developed the home 25 years after Loma Prieta, which hit Oct. 17, 1989, in the San Francisco and Monterey Bay Regions.

The engineers shook the table at three times the intensity of the ground shaking during Loma Prieta, which hit Oct. 17, 1989, in the San Francisco and Monterey Bay Regions.

The house slide from side to side atop the sliders but remained intact, the researchers reported.

“Under the isolators, the house basically saw no damage,” Deierlein said.

The team also bolted the home to the shake table to test the unibody design system separately. They developed computer models to predict when the house would fall, but it outperformed their expectations, the team says.

Under the triple-Loma Prieta conditions, a few cracks appeared in the stucco and drywall, and a swinging light in the garage shattered. The test window and steel door stayed put, as did the table and chair that furnished the test house, the university related.

Cost of Modifying

Deierlein estimates that the isolators would run up the cost of a 1,500- to 2,000-square-foot house by $10,000 to $15,000. Contractors could install them in about four days before building the home on top, he said.

The unibody method would only add a few thousand dollars to the cost of building a home the size of the test home, Miranda said. By comparison, earthquake insurance typically has high deductibles and premiums over $600 a year, Deierlein noted.

Both technologies could also be used to retrofit existing homes, but would be much easier to incorporate in new construction, the report related.

"We are always cautious never to talk about earthquake-proof," Deierlein said, "but our resistance is getting better and better."

Editor's Note: This post was updated at 2 p.m. ET, Nov. 21, 2014, to correct reference to insurance costs in California.

   

Tagged categories: Architecture; Design; Disasters; Engineers; Good Technical Practice; Health and safety; Maintenance programs; North America

Comment from David Johnson, (11/20/2014, 10:38 AM)

Anyone know where to get the linear isolators from? In Oklahoma, we're leading the nation in the number of earthquakes. There are many fault lines within the state.


Comment from Robert Ikenberry, (11/21/2014, 11:32 AM)

I'd suggest contacting the Stanford professor noted in the story. By the way, earthquake insurance is about $600 per year, not month, in the Bay Area.


Comment from Jill Speegle, (11/21/2014, 1:56 PM)

Thanks Robert, the story has been corrected.


Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.


Advertisements
 
Sauereisen, Inc.

 
Abrasives Inc.

 
Strategic Materials Inc.

 
SAFE Systems, Inc.

 
 
 

Technology Publishing Co., 1501 Reedsdale Street, Suite 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 15233

TEL 1-412-431-8300  • FAX  1-412-431-5428  •  EMAIL webmaster@paintsquare.com


The Technology Publishing Network

PaintSquare the Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings Paint BidTracker

 
EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About PaintSquare.com   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms & Conditions   |   Support   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us