Coatings Industry News

Main News Page

Beryllium Rule Planned for 2014

Friday, January 3, 2014

Comment | More

New federal proposals limiting worker exposure to beryllium—a particular hazard in open-air abrasive blasting—are on track to roll out in April, Occupational Safety and Health Administration officials say.

Details of the proposal are not yet available, but options under consideration include new Permissible Exposure Limits reducing those listed in OSHA's 1926.55 Appendix A (Occupational Health and Environmental Controls) and/or additional requirements for medical surveillance, according to a recent presentation by Tiffany DeFoe, a health scientist who is OSHA's project officer for the beryllium standard.

abrasive blasting

About 23,000 construction workers, including abrasive blasters, are considered at risk for excessive beryllium exposure, according to OSHA.

DeFoe updated the beryllium proposal's progress in December to OSHA's Advisory Committee for the Construction Industry.

The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for beryllium is expected to be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget in April, DeFoe said.

1970 Limits

The current Appendix A limits incorporate the 1970 American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists' Threshold Limit Values of Airborne Contaminant. The new medical surveillance under consideration could include physical exams, beryllium Lymphocyte Proliferation Testing (LPT), and/or CT scans, DeFoe said.

Beryllium, a toxic metal and component of coal, is "just a minor contaminant" in slag blast media, DeFoe said, but it can accumulate in thick blast dust to levels about the current PEL.

Abrasive Blasting

Beryllium is typically a trace element in coal abrasives, but poor ventilation and other unsafe practices can cause excessive worker exposures.

OSHA's current PEL for beryllium is 2.0 micrograms of beryllium per cubic meter of air (2.0 µg/m3) over eight hours. The agency is looking at reducing the PEL to as low as 0.1 micrograms of beryllium per cubic meter of air, DeFoe told Bloomberg News and confirmed in an email to PaintSquare News.

Other PEL thresholds under consideration are 0.2, 0.5 and 1 microgram per cubic meter, according to DeFoe's presentation.

The agency is also considering a new "short-term exposure limit to get some of those very high exposures under control,” DeFoe said.

Current requirements for respiratory protection, ventilation and personal protective equipment are not expected to change.

Protecting Blasters and Painters

OSHA estimates that 23,000 workers in construction are "potentially exposed" to excessive levels of beryllium, putting them at risk of sensitization, chronic beryllium disease, and lung cancer, DeFoe said.

Last year, OSHA reported "potential violations" by some slag-abrasive makers about beryllium disclosures on their labeling, following a complaint by the advocacy group Public Citizen.

The path to a new federal rule on beryllium exposure began in 2002 with a Request for Information. The Small Business Advocacy Review Panel released its analysis in January 2008.

United Steelworkers
United Steelworkers

The United Steelworkers has been seeking a new beryllium standard since 1999. Last year, the union joined beryllium maker Materion Brush in devising and submitting a model standard for OSHA's review.

In February 2012, Materion Brush, the leading U.S. supplier of beryllium, teamed up with the United Steelworkers to propose a model standard that sets a 0.2 µg/m3 threshhold and requires “feasible engineering controls in any operation which generates any beryllium dust or fume, even those which meet the exposure limit.”

'Too High'

“We believe the current OSHA permissible exposure limit for beryllium of 2 µg/m³ is too high,” Materion and the Steelworkers wrote OSHA Administrator David Michaels in a cover letter with the proposal.

“The current standard also lacks provisions for exposure monitoring, medical surveillance, information and training, all of which are critical to protecting exposed workers.”

abrasive blasting
Wikimedia Commons / Stan Zurek

Abrasive blasting operations create a "likely inhalation hazard" for those workers, according to the leading manufacturer of beryllium products.

Materion calls abrasive blasting operations a "likely inhalation hazard" for workers.

The Steelworkers have been pushing OSHA for a beryllium standard since 1999. The union represents workers who manufacture beryllium alloys and beryllium-containing products in a number of industries.

Materion said it hoped the model proposal would “expedite" the long-stalled beryllium rulemaking process.


Tagged categories: Abrasive blasting; Abrasives; Beryllium; Coal slag; Enforcement; Health & Safety; OSHA; Respirators; Ventilation

Comment from Paul Mellon, (1/5/2014, 2:43 PM)

Excellent recap of the OSHA presentation on the dangers beryllium dust exposure in coal and copper slag abrasives. I was one of the speakers referenced in the BNA article to the Committee. In addition, I can personally confirm that I reminded the Committee that Product Substitution is also OSHA's current stated policy under Engineering Controls for Abrasive Blasting for avoiding heavy metals in abrasives. Two non-beryllium abrasives products that I recommended as examples to the Committee were garnet or crushed glass.

Comment from Michael Vick, (1/8/2014, 1:32 PM)

It is unfortunate that all coal and copper slags are getting lumped together in this discussion, as not all slags are created equally. For instance, Sharpshot copper slag abrasive does not contain detectable beryllium and would be considered a non-beryllium abrasive product.

Comment from Paul Mellon, (1/12/2014, 10:48 PM)

Michael, please take a look at the current Sharpshot MSDS and you find beryllium is now listed as well as other toxins, per OSHA.

Comment from Keith Gabbard, (1/14/2014, 12:36 PM)

Paul, I took the liberty of checking on the current MSDS for Sharpshot (both on the web and called Mineral Research and Recovery Inc.). They indicated that the 12/2013 update to the MSDS reflects no detectable Beryllium. Do you have other information source that contradicts this info?

Comment from Steve Mehlman, (1/14/2014, 6:46 PM)

"Total metals testing of Sharpshot over the past 5 years has shown no detectable beryllium and I'm not aware of beryllium ever being listed in a Sharpshot MSDS."

Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.

KTA-Tator, Inc. - Corporate Office

SAFE Systems, Inc.

DeFelsko Corporation

AWWA (American Water Works Association)

Fischer Technology Inc.

Sauereisen, Inc.

Tarps manufacturing, Inc.

Modern Safety Techniques


Technology Publishing Co., 1501 Reedsdale Street, Suite 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 15233

TEL 1-412-431-8300  • FAX  1-412-431-5428  •  EMAIL

The Technology Publishing Network

PaintSquare the Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings Paint BidTracker

EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About   |   Privacy Policy (Updated 2/24/2020)   |   Terms & Conditions   |   Support   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us