Special Report
Rules of Removal, Chemical Stripping and Historic Masonry

From D+D Print, May 2013

by Courtney Murdock, AMT Lab

The author explains the process for removing coatings from historic substrates, specifically masonry....
(Login to read the full article)

   

Tagged categories: Chemical stripping; Historic Structures; Lead; Maintenance + Renovation; Masonry; Paint Removal; Prosoco Inc.

Comment from Jon Cavallo, (7/5/2013, 8:58 AM)

I suggest that Ms. Murdock spend a little less time lecturing and a little more time attending state-of-the-art conferences to see what technologies are now available for surface cleaning involved in restoration of historic structures. For instance, lead and other heavy metals can be reliably detected using nondestructive instruments without disturbing the existing coating layer. Her photos in the article (particularly of the US Capitol project) demonstrate the environmental mess that can be created by combining chemical strippers with high-volume water cleaning. Additionally, please note the construction "white-hats" standing in close proximity to the water cleaning operation are most assuredly breathing in the paint-debris laden water mist produced by the water cleaning operation.


Comment from Tom Schwerdt, (9/3/2013, 11:12 AM)

Why not dry ice blasting? When I saw a demonstration on a historical bridge, it worked very well (certainly faster and cleaner than the chemical stripping) - with no damage to the underlying concrete. Of course, old mortar and brick is a lot softer than structural concrete. The chemical stripper photos shown above show a lot of debris and water just being released into the environment, without even tarps on the ground to try and catch debris for proper disposal. Also, are you being sure to test EVERY layer of EVERY paint for lead? It was not mentioned in the article. Just dabbing the topcoat is not sufficient to determine if lead is present in lower layers.


Comment from M. Halliwell, (9/4/2013, 11:02 AM)

A lot has changed in the last 15 years (since some of the used photos). Locally, neither of the rinse / water blasting projects in the photographs would have been permitted to proceed without containment for the debris and wash water as well as better protection for the observers (whatever their roles).


Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.

Advertisements
 
SAFE Systems, Inc.

 
Sauereisen, Inc.

 
KTA-Tator, Inc. - Corporate Office

 
ABKaelin, LLC

 
Mitsubishi Gas Chemical America

 
DeFelsko Corporation

 
HoldTight Solutions Inc.

 
Sidewinder/Persyst Enterprises, Inc.

 
NLB Corporation

 
Tarps manufacturing, Inc.

 
 
 
 

Technology Publishing Co., 1501 Reedsdale Street, Suite 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 15233

TEL 1-412-431-8300  • FAX  1-412-431-5428  •  EMAIL webmaster@paintsquare.com


The Technology Publishing Network

PaintSquare the Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings Paint BidTracker

 
EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About PaintSquare.com   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms & Conditions   |   Support   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us