Follow us on Twitter Follow us on LinkedIn Like us on Facebook Follow us on Instagram Visit the TPC Store
Search the site




Problem Solving Forum

| More

January 9 - January 13, 2017

Where would you use epoxy and cementitious intumescent coatings?

More items for Coating Materials

Selected Answers

From Stephen Dobrosielski of John B. Conomos, Inc. on January 11, 2017:
Alfredo, good summary filled with a lot of common sense. The problem with common sense is that it is uncommon.

From Alfredo Claussen of Instituto Mexicano del Petroleo on January 10, 2017:
Independently of the material proposed for fire protection, one must first address the requirements. In order to pretend to get a certain degree of protection, the type of fire and its characteristics need to be clearly established and throughly understood. In the severe conditions of the petroleum industry, the exact type of fire needs to be considered. Another often neglected consideration is that most of the accidents start with a leak, then an explosion, and finally a fire. If the material does not withstand the pressure wave of the explosion, a damaged "protection" will achieve little or nothing. Cementitious coatings seldom achieve the resilience to actually withstand a typical pressure blast wave from an explosion of hydrocarbons, therefore I'm skeptical about their applicability in structural steel applications, like refineries or offshore platforms. Even epox -based coatings need to be carefully evaluated in regards to their adhesion and integrity (reinforcement). The objective is to avoid disbondment and thus, failure to protect the underlying steel from overheating. Cementitious coatings, on the other side, seldom have the flexibility and toughness to remain adhered to the steel; the sad case of the asbestos-based coating used on the World Trade Center demonstrated the fragile, failure-prone nature of those types of materials. Very little material remained adhered to the steel beams after the initial impact. And finally, the coating needs to meet the required degree of corrosion protection, especially in corrosive atmospheres (most frequent in refining and offshore or coastal areas). To round the subject, a specialized consultant should be assigned to the design and construction, one who is trained and knowledgeable enough to fully understand the nuances inside the different standards used to define the fire, and then the complex response of the protective material. Few coating vendors really understand the erosive nature of a jet fire or the action of the blast wave, just for example! Another "gray" area is the classification of these coatings, as sometimes they are called "fireproofing," which is an improper term; and in other cases the wording "active" vs "passive " coating is wrong, too An active fire protection is, by definition, a system that requires a deliberate and well defined action, like the starting of a firewater pump or the opening of a deluge valve. Thus, calling "active" a fire protection coating is not proper. Those should be properly called "passive," and the distinction then shall be between "intumescent" and "insulating," but both kinds are passive. After the tremendous explosions and fire on the Abkatun-A Permanent Offshore platform of PEMEX in Campeche Bay in 2015, the need to review and reevaluate the effectiveness of passive fire protection coatings was exposed. Their poor performance allowed the main structure to collapse early and contributed to the almost complete destruction of the platform.

From Mika Mack of MAPPA TESTLAB INC. on January 10, 2017:
(laughing) I was hoping for less consensus and more truth. Although my background is more on the cementitious side, I love the articles and data supporting the epoxy intumescent coatings.

From Joe Miller of NextGen Green Building Products, Inc. dba on January 10, 2017:
Intumescent fireproofing is typically made from epoxies or other resins, not cements. Cement-based fireproofing is passive in my experience. It does not expand when heated in a fire like intumescent fireproofing does.

From Michael Quaranta of OPERATIONS 40 on January 9, 2017:
Ahhh Mike Mack . . . the truth is in the reading! The typical solvent-based epoxy is flammable both in the can and on the applied surface. So your words reporting active (?) and passive (?) fireproofing, plus the time window to escape (!!!) are perfect, followed by the question: What true fire rating should be applied to solvent-based epoxy intumescent coating, or do we need more physics coating truth and less consensus in the rated ASTM specification?

From Mika Mack of MAPPA TESTLAB INC. on January 9, 2017:
Epoxy and cementitious intumescent coatings are used for active and passive fireproofing. One is designed  for suppression and the other for a time window to escape a burning structure. Uses depending on substrates and exposure.

From Clyde Morgan of BURNS & McDONNELL on January 9, 2017:
Use epoxy intumescents on refinery structural steel, refinery supporting skirts, refinery vessel supporting saddles, surface protection for propulsion.

Please sign in to submit your answer this question    

Tagged categories: Intumescent; Passive Fire Protection

Current PSF Question | Submit a PSF Question | Full PSF Archive

New resins from BASF will have metals loving water!
Excellent corrosion resistance, low VOC, high gloss, thin films 800-231-7868

PPG Protective and Marine Coatings Group
We Protect and Beautify the World
PPG is widely recognized as a world leader in protective and marine coatings, developing innovative, cutting-edge products and services.

Carboline Company
Fireproofing Solutions
Pyroclad® X1 Thermo-Lag® Pyrocrete® – protecting against hydrocarbon and jet fires, explosions, and cryogenic spills.

Detail Masters
Overspray Removal
We offer professional, turnkey service and unparalleled quality!
Our process can save hundreds— even thousands of dollars. It's fast, environmentally safe and 100% guaranteed.

Mitsubishi Gas Chemical America
Performance Amine 1,3-BAC
A highly reactive cycloaliphatic diamine offering superior performance. Reasonable cost and curing efficacy makes it suitable for all types of epoxy resin applications.

Jotun Paints Inc.
Jotachar JF750 - The Time Saving Solution
The only mesh free solution for jet fire scenarios. Jotachar saves installation time and material costs - the next generation of epoxy passive fire protection.

Sherwin-Williams Oil & Gas App
Our coatings and linings expertise available 24/7, allowing you to explore the best Sherwin-Williams solutions for oil refineries, shale drilling sites, and offshore. Android users
click here. Download today!

KTA-Tator, Inc. - Corporate Office
KTA-Tator Training Course Opportunities
• IACET Authorized Continuing Education Unit (CEU) Provider
• Live Basic Coatings Inspection Courses
• Customized/Private Courses
• Online/self-paced curriculums
Contact: Tiffany Kelly at 412-788-1300 x217

Strategic Materials Inc.
Crushed Glass Abrasives
Competitively priced, high-performing crushed glass abrasive. Available today. Toll-free 1-866-775-6226

RBW Enterprises, Inc.
Robotic Blasting and Painting
When using the FasterBlaster and FasterPainter, blasting and painting can be conducted simultaneously. View the video for a full explanation of the operation.


Technology Publishing Co., 1501 Reedsdale Street, Suite 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 15233

TEL 1-412-431-8300  • FAX  1-412-431-5428  •  EMAIL

The Technology Publishing Network

Durability + Design PaintSquare the Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings Paint BidTracker

EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About   |   Privacy policy   |   Terms & conditions   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us