Follow us on Twitter Follow us on LinkedIn Like us on Facebook Follow us on Instagram Visit the TPC Store
Search the site




Problem Solving Forum

| More

January 9 - January 13, 2017

Where would you use epoxy and cementitious intumescent coatings?

More items for Coating Materials

Selected Answers

From Stephen Dobrosielski of John B. Conomos, Inc. on January 11, 2017:
Alfredo, good summary filled with a lot of common sense. The problem with common sense is that it is uncommon.

From Alfredo Claussen of Instituto Mexicano del Petroleo on January 10, 2017:
Independently of the material proposed for fire protection, one must first address the requirements. In order to pretend to get a certain degree of protection, the type of fire and its characteristics need to be clearly established and throughly understood. In the severe conditions of the petroleum industry, the exact type of fire needs to be considered. Another often neglected consideration is that most of the accidents start with a leak, then an explosion, and finally a fire. If the material does not withstand the pressure wave of the explosion, a damaged "protection" will achieve little or nothing. Cementitious coatings seldom achieve the resilience to actually withstand a typical pressure blast wave from an explosion of hydrocarbons, therefore I'm skeptical about their applicability in structural steel applications, like refineries or offshore platforms. Even epox -based coatings need to be carefully evaluated in regards to their adhesion and integrity (reinforcement). The objective is to avoid disbondment and thus, failure to protect the underlying steel from overheating. Cementitious coatings, on the other side, seldom have the flexibility and toughness to remain adhered to the steel; the sad case of the asbestos-based coating used on the World Trade Center demonstrated the fragile, failure-prone nature of those types of materials. Very little material remained adhered to the steel beams after the initial impact. And finally, the coating needs to meet the required degree of corrosion protection, especially in corrosive atmospheres (most frequent in refining and offshore or coastal areas). To round the subject, a specialized consultant should be assigned to the design and construction, one who is trained and knowledgeable enough to fully understand the nuances inside the different standards used to define the fire, and then the complex response of the protective material. Few coating vendors really understand the erosive nature of a jet fire or the action of the blast wave, just for example! Another "gray" area is the classification of these coatings, as sometimes they are called "fireproofing," which is an improper term; and in other cases the wording "active" vs "passive " coating is wrong, too An active fire protection is, by definition, a system that requires a deliberate and well defined action, like the starting of a firewater pump or the opening of a deluge valve. Thus, calling "active" a fire protection coating is not proper. Those should be properly called "passive," and the distinction then shall be between "intumescent" and "insulating," but both kinds are passive. After the tremendous explosions and fire on the Abkatun-A Permanent Offshore platform of PEMEX in Campeche Bay in 2015, the need to review and reevaluate the effectiveness of passive fire protection coatings was exposed. Their poor performance allowed the main structure to collapse early and contributed to the almost complete destruction of the platform.

From Mika Mack of MAPPA TESTLAB INC. on January 10, 2017:
(laughing) I was hoping for less consensus and more truth. Although my background is more on the cementitious side, I love the articles and data supporting the epoxy intumescent coatings.

From Joe Miller of NextGen Green Building Products, Inc. dba on January 10, 2017:
Intumescent fireproofing is typically made from epoxies or other resins, not cements. Cement-based fireproofing is passive in my experience. It does not expand when heated in a fire like intumescent fireproofing does.

From Michael Quaranta of OPERATIONS 40 on January 9, 2017:
Ahhh Mike Mack . . . the truth is in the reading! The typical solvent-based epoxy is flammable both in the can and on the applied surface. So your words reporting active (?) and passive (?) fireproofing, plus the time window to escape (!!!) are perfect, followed by the question: What true fire rating should be applied to solvent-based epoxy intumescent coating, or do we need more physics coating truth and less consensus in the rated ASTM specification?

From Mika Mack of MAPPA TESTLAB INC. on January 9, 2017:
Epoxy and cementitious intumescent coatings are used for active and passive fireproofing. One is designed  for suppression and the other for a time window to escape a burning structure. Uses depending on substrates and exposure.

From Clyde Morgan of BURNS & McDONNELL on January 9, 2017:
Use epoxy intumescents on refinery structural steel, refinery supporting skirts, refinery vessel supporting saddles, surface protection for propulsion.

Please sign in to submit your answer this question    

Tagged categories: Intumescent; Passive Fire Protection

Current PSF Question | Submit a PSF Question | Full PSF Archive

Sherwin-Williams General Polymers Resinous Flooring App
Our coatings and linings expertise available 24/7, allowing you to explore the Sherwin-Williams systems best suited for your flooring needs. Android Users Click here to Download the app today!

PPG Protective and Marine Coatings Group
We Protect and Beautify the World
PPG is widely recognized as a world leader in protective and marine coatings, developing innovative, cutting-edge products and services.

Mitsubishi Gas Chemical America
Performance Amine 1,3-BAC
A highly reactive cycloaliphatic diamine offering superior performance. Reasonable cost and curing efficacy makes it suitable for all types of epoxy resin applications.

SAFE Systems, Inc.
Enduroguard -
The Tough Cable
for a Tough Industry.
Reduce maintenance costs and down time, increase job site safety with Enduroguard Cable. Available exclusively from SAFE Systems. UL listed, flexible, abrasion resistant and cut resistant.

New resins from BASF will have metals loving water!
Excellent corrosion resistance, low VOC, high gloss, thin films 800-231-7868

Jotun Paints Inc.
Jotun Jotachar 1709
Mesh-free passive fire protection epoxy designed to protect against hydrocarbon pool fire scenarios for up to four hours as defined in the ANSI/UL1709 standard.

Carboline Company
Carboline is pouring with opportunities
We are proud of our exceptional products and services, and believe that people are our greatest asset. Come grow with us!

DeFelsko Corporation
PosiTector SST Soluble Salt Tester
Measures the concentration of soluble salts on metal surfaces. Use with all Bresle patch types including the reusable, adhesive-free PosiPatch.

Fischer Technology Inc.
Paired with the PHASCOPE PMP10, Fischer’s new probe is quick and accurate for measuring thermally sprayed aluminum on stainless steel. Click to learn more.

SEMicro Division, M.E. Taylor Engineering, Inc.
Coatings Adhesion Testers
The PATTI® accurately measures the bond strength between coating & substrate. Outfitted properly, the surface can be rough, porous, or curved & >10K psi strong!


Technology Publishing Co., 1501 Reedsdale Street, Suite 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 15233

TEL 1-412-431-8300  • FAX  1-412-431-5428  •  EMAIL

The Technology Publishing Network

Durability + Design PaintSquare the Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings Paint BidTracker

EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About   |   Privacy policy   |   Terms & conditions   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us