PaintSquare.com
      | Connect Follow us on Twitter Like us on Facebook
About | Subscribe | Advertise
  

 

Download our free ebook on Advances in Corrosion Control Coating Technology

Problem Solving Forum

| More

February 10 - February 14, 2014

Under what circumstances is third-party inspection justified on commercial coating work?



More items for Quality Control


Selected Answers

From Billy Russell of D&R COATING INSPECTION on March 12, 2014:
I disagree. Under NO circumstances should an owner rely on a contractor's own QC to carry out QA/QC. Verify everything with an independent 3rd party. Projects are only warrantied for 1 year. You can spray a dirt parking lot and lock the gate come back in a year to find little or nothing wrong, but 5 years from now on a steel structure--then you start seeing what kind of job you got for the money. Never rely on a contractor's QC reports; verify it yourself !

From WAN MOHAMAD NOR WAN ABDUL RAHMAN of ANTAP SEMENANJUNG SDN. BHD. on March 12, 2014:
On every project or in daily affairs, the function of a third party is very important, because it enables checks and balances, provided the third party is not biased.

From Kumar Kolur Vadivelu of Sadara Chemical Company on March 9, 2014:
 Circumstances requiring third-party inspection might include 1) a complicated project requiring different type of coatings; 2) the applicator is  new to the particular coating material; 3) insurance requirements because of legal concerns. If  these circumstances are not critical, then contractor QC may be enough to carry out QA/QC activity for an effective painting program.

From Bryan Zofkie of Aerco Sandblasting Co. on March 3, 2014:
I couldn’t agree more with both Mr. Halliwell and Mr. Russell in that QA/QC is the last thing you want to short-change on a coating project. At the same time I also think there is something to be said about the contractor performing the work. If you as the owner have experience with this contractor, and know the contractor is  knowledgeable and experienced with the application system as well as  QA/QC procedures (much like a third-party inspector would perform), then I am not sure a third party inspector is completely necessary. On the other hand, if this is a new contractor or even a new coating product or procedure for an experienced contractor, I think at a minimum a manufacturer's representative should be involved if a third party inspector is not feasible.

From M. Halliwell of Thurber Engineering Ltd. on February 13, 2014:
I think that any time there could be significant problems (be it financial, time, or just plain challenges to getting the job done) should a coating system fail, then making use of third-party inspection can be justified. I also think Billy is "on the money." If the job could be a problem, then the Owner can pay a bit more now for a QA/QC program or potentially a lot more later if/when the job needs to be redone. I also agree that the third-party inspectors need to be held accountable for their work.  If they aren't, then where's the motivation to do a good job?

From Billy Russell of D&R COATING INSPECTION on February 12, 2014:
I believe that third-party inspection is justified at a projects inception to ensure compliance with the specifications, as well as with coating manufacturers recommendations in order to ensure the life of the coating system. That being said, inspection firms should be held liable for their inspection reports to the owner. Bonding should be required of inspection firms  on projects. If there is a coating failure or if claims are filed, inspection firms as well as the contractor should be held accountable.  Then the games will end.

From Timothy McCoy of Chester Engineers on February 11, 2014:
I believe that 3rd party inspection is justified whenever an owner wants to be assured that he is getting what he is paying for! I use the analogy, you can pay me now, or pay me (usually much more) later. Don't save money on a project by cutting a good QA/QC program!

Please sign in to submit your answer this question    

Tagged categories: Architectural coatings; Inspection


Current PSF Question | Submit a PSF Question | Full PSF Archive

DeFelsko Corporation
PosiTector Inspection Kits

PosiTector 6000 Coating Thickness Gage easily converts to a surface profile gage, dew point meter or ultrasonic wall thickness gage with a simple probe change


HoldTight Solutions Inc.
NO FLASH RUST - NO CONTAMINANTS

Our HoldTight®102 salt remover & flash rust
preventer prevents flash
rust by removing surface contaminants. Contact us
for your nearest distributor.
(800) 319.8802 sales@holdtight.com


Waterjet Technology Association (WJTA)
2016 WJTA-IMCA Expo Nov. 2-3, New Orleans

See the latest advances in automated and handheld UHP waterjetting tools/systems for paint/coating removal, surface prep, industrial cleaning. Exhibits, live demos.


Novetas Solutions
Number 1 Crushed Glass Abrasive in America!

Manufactured from 100% Recycled Glass.
NO Crystalline Silica,
Beryllium & Arsenic
Great White Metal Finish!
4 plants on Navy QPL
Call us at 866-775-6226


KTA-Tator, Inc. - Corporate Office
KTA Analyzes
Coating Failures

• Field Diagnosis
• Lab Diagnosis
• Determination of Cause
• Recommendations
www.kta.com
Call 1-800-245-6379


ABKaelin, LLC
ABkaelin, LLC

SSPC C3 & C5 TRAINING
QUALITY PROGRAM/CERTIFICATION SUPPORT – ISO,NQA-1, AISC SSPC QP and QS.
MONITORING-Environmental and worker monitoring CONSULTING & INSPECTION – Coatings, EHS, and compliance.
www.abkaelin.com


Fischer Technology Inc.
MP0R with rotating display screen

Automatic rotating display screen just like your smart phone. Click for Video
Call 800-243-8417


Novatek Corporation
Novatek Corporation, Dustless Coatings Removal

Strip, clean and profile all dust free! Comply with new lead standards. Contact today: (866) 563-7800


SSPC: The Society for Protective Coatings
http://www.sspc.org/

Join SSPC and Enhance
Your Career !


Clemco Industries Corp.
Powerful Protection in a Small Package

Mounts inside blast helmet, alerts operator to dangerous breathing-air condition by audible, visual, and vibratory alarms. Easily calibrated, battery operated.

 
 
 
Technology Publishing

The Technology Publishing Network

The Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings (JPCL) PaintSquare
Durability + Design Paint BidTracker

 
EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About PaintSquare.com   |   Privacy policy   |   Terms & conditions   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us
 

© Copyright 2000-2016, Technology Publishing / PaintSquare, All rights reserved
2100 Wharton Street, Suite 310, Pittsburgh PA 15203-1951; Tel 1-412-431-8300; Fax 1-412-431-5428; E-mail webmaster@paintsquare.com