PaintSquare.com
Follow us on Twitter Follow us on LinkedIn Like us on Facebook Follow us on Instagram Visit the TPC Store
Search the site

 

Advertisement

PaintSquare


Problem Solving Forum

| More

February 10 - February 14, 2014

Under what circumstances is third-party inspection justified on commercial coating work?

More items for Quality Control


Selected Answers

From Billy Russell of D&R COATING INSPECTION on March 12, 2014:
I disagree. Under NO circumstances should an owner rely on a contractor's own QC to carry out QA/QC. Verify everything with an independent 3rd party. Projects are only warrantied for 1 year. You can spray a dirt parking lot and lock the gate come back in a year to find little or nothing wrong, but 5 years from now on a steel structure--then you start seeing what kind of job you got for the money. Never rely on a contractor's QC reports; verify it yourself !

From WAN MOHAMAD NOR WAN ABDUL RAHMAN of ANTAP SEMENANJUNG SDN. BHD. on March 12, 2014:
On every project or in daily affairs, the function of a third party is very important, because it enables checks and balances, provided the third party is not biased.

From Kumar Kolur Vadivelu of Sadara Chemical Company on March 9, 2014:
 Circumstances requiring third-party inspection might include 1) a complicated project requiring different type of coatings; 2) the applicator is  new to the particular coating material; 3) insurance requirements because of legal concerns. If  these circumstances are not critical, then contractor QC may be enough to carry out QA/QC activity for an effective painting program.

From Bryan Zofkie of Aerco Sandblasting Co. on March 3, 2014:
I couldn’t agree more with both Mr. Halliwell and Mr. Russell in that QA/QC is the last thing you want to short-change on a coating project. At the same time I also think there is something to be said about the contractor performing the work. If you as the owner have experience with this contractor, and know the contractor is  knowledgeable and experienced with the application system as well as  QA/QC procedures (much like a third-party inspector would perform), then I am not sure a third party inspector is completely necessary. On the other hand, if this is a new contractor or even a new coating product or procedure for an experienced contractor, I think at a minimum a manufacturer's representative should be involved if a third party inspector is not feasible.

From M. Halliwell of Thurber Engineering Ltd. on February 13, 2014:
I think that any time there could be significant problems (be it financial, time, or just plain challenges to getting the job done) should a coating system fail, then making use of third-party inspection can be justified. I also think Billy is "on the money." If the job could be a problem, then the Owner can pay a bit more now for a QA/QC program or potentially a lot more later if/when the job needs to be redone. I also agree that the third-party inspectors need to be held accountable for their work.  If they aren't, then where's the motivation to do a good job?

From Billy Russell of D&R COATING INSPECTION on February 12, 2014:
I believe that third-party inspection is justified at a projects inception to ensure compliance with the specifications, as well as with coating manufacturers recommendations in order to ensure the life of the coating system. That being said, inspection firms should be held liable for their inspection reports to the owner. Bonding should be required of inspection firms  on projects. If there is a coating failure or if claims are filed, inspection firms as well as the contractor should be held accountable.  Then the games will end.

From Timothy McCoy of Chester Engineers on February 11, 2014:
I believe that 3rd party inspection is justified whenever an owner wants to be assured that he is getting what he is paying for! I use the analogy, you can pay me now, or pay me (usually much more) later. Don't save money on a project by cutting a good QA/QC program!

Please sign in to submit your answer this question    

Tagged categories: Architectural coatings; Inspection


Current PSF Question | Submit a PSF Question | Full PSF Archive

Advertisements
 
KTA-Tator, Inc. - Corporate Office
 
KTA-Tator
Coatings Inspection
 
Any structure, any height, any place - A qualified coatings inspector is always available. Call 1-800-245-6379.
 

 
DeFelsko Corporation
 
PosiTector SHD Shore Hardness Durometer
 
PosiTector SHD measures the hardness of non-metallic materials. Features a measurement timer, auto ignore mode and internal memory. Shore A or D available.
 

 
Industrial Vacuum Equipment Corp.
 
Hurricane Vacuums
& Dust Collectors
 
Vacuum and dust collector hose, filters and related accessories.
IndustrialVacuum.com
 

 
SAFE Systems, Inc.
 
Enduroguard -
The Tough Cable
for a Tough Industry.
 
Reduce maintenance costs and down time, increase job site safety with Enduroguard Cable. Available exclusively from SAFE Systems. UL listed, flexible, abrasion resistant and cut resistant.
 

 
Fischer Technology Inc.
 
NEW PROBE FOR MEASURING TSA THICKNESS
 
Paired with the PHASCOPE PMP10, Fischer’s new probe is quick and accurate for measuring thermally sprayed aluminum on stainless steel. Click to learn more.
 

 
HoldTight Solutions Inc.
 
NO FLASH RUST - NO CONTAMINANTS
 
Our HoldTight®102 salt remover & flash rust
preventer prevents flash
rust by removing surface contaminants. Contact us
for your nearest distributor.
(800) 319.8802 sales@holdtight.com
 

 
Corrosion Probe, Inc.
 
From Detection to Correction
 
Corrosion Probe, Inc. has the Most Concrete Coatings Experience and Expertise. Contact us today at
860-767-4402, www.cpiengineering.com
 

 
Sherwin-Williams
 
Sherwin-Williams Oil & Gas App
 
Our coatings and linings expertise available 24/7, allowing you to explore the best Sherwin-Williams solutions for oil refineries, shale drilling sites, and offshore. Android users
click here. Download today!
 

 
PreTox Products - NexTec, Inc.
 
GOT LEAD? Specify Pretox System products
 
The ONLY Lead Stabilizer Compatible with All Paint Removal Methods. Works with all Blast Media: Grits | Recyclable Abrasives | CO2 | Water | Power Tools | Etc. Call Dave Steffen at 800.338.8296.
 

 
Mitsubishi Gas Chemical America
 
Performance Amine 1,3-BAC
 
A highly reactive cycloaliphatic diamine offering superior performance. Reasonable cost and curing efficacy makes it suitable for all types of epoxy resin applications.
 

 
 
 

Technology Publishing Co., 2100 Wharton Street, Suite 310, Pittsburgh PA 15203-1951

TEL 1-412-431-8300  • FAX  1-412-431-5428  •  EMAIL webmaster@paintsquare.com


The Technology Publishing Network

Durability + Design PaintSquare the Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings Paint BidTracker

 
EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About PaintSquare.com   |   Privacy policy   |   Terms & conditions   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us