PaintSquare.com
      | Connect Follow us on Twitter Like us on Facebook
About | Subscribe | Advertise
  

 

Download our FREE eResource: Specifier's Choice Guide. Get it now.

Problem Solving Forum

| More

July 1 - July 7, 2013

Why would a pull-off adhesion test give a high value (no failure) for a solventless epoxy that later showed poor adhesion in service?



More items for Quality Control


Selected Answers

From Mike Moran of Kiewit Power Enbgineers on August 15, 2013:
Thick epoxy coatings have lateral strength/self supporting. The epoxy can be disbonded; however, it takes a lot of force to break the coating with the pull-off.

From S. Matsumoto of Abraco on August 14, 2013:
Solventless epoxy coatings shrink about 5% when cured. The relationship between WFT and DFT shows this easily. If the coating's adhesion is not resistant to shrink tension, detachment could occur.

From PARVEZ SHAIKH of SANDVIK ASIA PVT. LTD. on August 1, 2013:
When it comes to service, the question involves the exposure condition to which the coating was exposed. Was the coating designed for that exposure?  If not, the chance of failure is very high.  To clarify, we have to get the data detailing the exposure conditions.

From leoncio ucancial of hempel-glucom on July 6, 2013:
The first point is to evaluate the conditions of surface preparation. If the structure will be in immersion service,  surface preparation should be SSPC-SP 5, with a profile of 3 mils mínimum. If the environment i satmospheric, surface preparation should be SSPC-SP 6 or SP10, with a profile of 1.5 to 2.5 mils.

The second point involves the coating systems. Failure of the adhesión could be caused by improper mixing (resin mixing ratio-catalyst).

 The third point is  evaluating the climatic conditions where this painting occurred and evaluating the adhesión test. It should be noted that with epoxy resins at low temperatures, the chemical reaction is slower

From Bonny Njimogu of Construction Specialist Services Ltd. on July 3, 2013:
There could be two major reasons that result in such failures. 1)The tack or primer coat was not applied to the substrate prior to applying the topping. 2) The water level below the substrate might be low during the installation and testing period. Moisture absorption and capillary action at the high water level could affect the substrate, thereby resulting in failure.

From Stefan Danek of Defence Scienece technology Organisation on July 2, 2013:
First, one has to consider whether the pull-off adhesion test was carried out on the same sample that failed later in service, i.e., is the test sample representative of the in-service coating? This will address the very valid point raised by Atanas on whether there is likely to have been a difference in surface preparation (surface preparation and substrate cleanliness, including soluble salts) and paint application (paint sample, operator, equipment, application conditions, DFT, dew point, etc.) If the test sample is not representative of the in-service sample, then there could be any of a number of reasons for the difference as discussed above. Second, in the laboratory, the results obtained from dry adhesion tests can often be superior to wet adhesion tests. Typically, this involves cross hatch testing rather than pull-off adhesion testing, and is used  for coating systems that are relatively thin (less than 5 mils), for example, as applied in the aerospace industry. This can be very critical for exterior coatings exposed to weather, particularly when substrates can be subjected to periods of prolonged wetness. By dry adhesion, I mean undertaking the adhesion test after the coating has cured under standard conditions. Wet adhesion refers to adhesion tests undertaken on the cured paint film following immersion in water. Some specifications require adhesion to be remeasured following immersion in water at ambient temperature for 24 hours. I prefer immersion in water at 122 F (50 C) for 7 days. Coatings will fail wet adhesion tests if they are either unsuited to the application or have been applied over substrates which  contain soluble surface salts which can lead to osmotic blistering, even in epoxy systems applied at 6 -8 mils. The question is what to what climatic conditions was the failed sample exposed in service?

From Atanas Cholakov of ACT on July 1, 2013:
If the test is carried out on a test panel, is the coating been applied in  the same climatic conditions as on the work piece? Often, there is a difference. A pull-off on the work piece itself can give a better indication of adhesion. Coating  application might have been compromised (surface profile, cleanliness). Is the coating being properly selected for the service environment and conditions, and what does 'later' mean in elapsed service life?

Please sign in to submit your answer this question    

Tagged categories: Adhesion; Performance testing; Solvents


Current PSF Question | Submit a PSF Question | Full PSF Archive

KTA-Tator, Inc. - Corporate Office
KTA-Tator EH&S Services

• Ambient & Worker Exposure Air Monitoring
• Safety & Health Program Development
• Lead Paint Assessments
& Specifications
• Health Hazard & Jobsite Safety Assessments
Call 1-800-245-6379


HoldTight Solutions Inc.
NO FLASH RUST - NO CONTAMINANTS

Our HoldTight®102 salt remover & flash rust
preventer prevents flash
rust by removing surface contaminants. Contact us
for your nearest distributor.
(800) 319.8802 sales@holdtight.com


Fischer Technology Inc.
MP0R with rotating display screen

Automatic rotating display screen just like your smart phone. Click for Video
Call 800-243-8417


DeFelsko Corporation
The Next Generation PosiTest AT-A

NEW Automatic Adhesion Tester features touch screen, adjustable pull-rate, pull limit, hold times, and nature of fracture/user notes.


SEMicro Division, M.E. Taylor Engineering, Inc.
Coatings Adhesion Testers

The PATTI® accurately measures the bond strength between coating & substrate. Outfitted properly, the surface can be rough, porous, or curved & >10K psi strong!


Novetas Solutions
Number 1 Crushed Glass Abrasive in America!

Manufactured from 100% Recycled Glass.
NO Crystalline Silica,
Beryllium & Arsenic
Great White Metal Finish!
4 plants on Navy QPL
Call us at 866-775-6226


Atlantic Design, Inc.
BUILDING INNOVATION, NOT IMITATION

The smallest version of our Blast Vacuum Recyclers, this ADI 2300CFM 2-Pot is a cleverly designed power package for those smaller jobs. 866.Call.ADI


Axxiom Manufacturing
The Undisputed
Industry Leader.

Proven Innovation. Job Performance. Industry Training. Workplace Safety. Only Schmidt® abrasive blast equipment by Axxiom Manufacturing delivers it all!

 
 
 
Technology Publishing

The Technology Publishing Network

The Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings (JPCL) PaintSquare
Durability + Design Paint BidTracker

 
EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About PaintSquare.com   |   Privacy policy   |   Terms & conditions   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us
 

© Copyright 2000-2016, Technology Publishing / PaintSquare, All rights reserved
2100 Wharton Street, Suite 310, Pittsburgh PA 15203-1951; Tel 1-412-431-8300; Fax 1-412-431-5428; E-mail webmaster@paintsquare.com