PaintSquare.com
Follow us on Twitter Follow us on LinkedIn Like us on Facebook Follow us on Instagram Visit the TPC Store
Search the site

 

Advertisement

Montipower, Inc.


Problem Solving Forum

| More

February 20 - February 26, 2012

Some painting specifications call for the use of “Best Effort” in relation to blasting. How does one determine “Best Effort?”

More items for Surface Preparation


Selected Answers

From James Albertoni of CA Department of Water Resources on December 18, 2013:
As an owner, I frequently have to write "best effort" into my rehab specifications simply because an area is not accessible for blasting or tools (an accessible area should never be specified as "best effort"). We make sure, however,  during the job walk or pre-bid meeting that it is clearly understood that best effort means the blaster needs to put some effort into it and not just skip over the area, but also, that they shouldn't spend all day on it. Then we clarify that we understand we can't inspect the surface and understand that a coating may not last in that area.

From boris vidic of CIS on December 18, 2013:
We, the people who are dealing with paint, may want to use common sense rather than "best effort."

From James Schuster of Painting Service Inspection on December 6, 2013:
When “best effort” is used, it is usually limited to areas that are inaccessible for abrasive blasting due to the design of the structure and therefore impossible to achieve the blast cleanliness level specified. These areas need to be evaluated on a case-by- case basis, and the “best effort” approach documented and dealt with as agreed upon to achieve the best result possible.

From Car F. of Municipal City on December 4, 2013:

“Best effort” is a subjective judgment based on good will and feel-good sentiments, not facts, usually bestowed upon children who are doing really bad in school due to laziness, poor family relations, poverty or other factors. This practice is not recommended for serious work where “best effort” can’t be measured in a tangible way in front of a judge investigating why your coating failed after 3 months.

Surgeon: “Sorry, Mr. Smith, we amputated the wrong leg, but we did our “best effort.”

Mr. Smith: "I understand doctor, I still have another leg and at least you did your “best effort.”

“Best effort” is a recipe for disaster that has no place in a trade that relies on certainties.

From Dzevdet Agoli of MIM on December 3, 2013:
Best effort means the blasting is compliant with recommended surface preparation as stated in the data sheet, as well as with relevant standards in regards to pre-blast treatment, surface preparation degree, surface profile, water-soluble salt contamination, oil contamination and dust contamination. All of these are covered by standards.

From Erik Andreassen of CFPS on March 26, 2012:
 The term "Best Effort" is not a specification. Reject this terminology used by obviously someone who has little or no knowledge of our industry.

From Christian Favennec of DCNS on February 19, 2012:
According to my experience, best effort is never enough and is a subjective criteria. If you receive a specification where it is asked to perform "best effort,", you have to translate it in not subjective criteria that can be measured on field. Criterias for degrees of blasting are defined in normalisation standards and correspond to level of cleanliness before painting (SSPC or ISO standards, for example). The degree of blasting depends on the kind of project (new building or maintenance), the environment, and the performance you want to reach. The level of cleanliness before painting must always be associated with other criterias, for example:  - Level of cleanliness: Sa 2 1/2 according to ISO 8501-1;

- Level of soluble salts : 3 µg/Cm²; according to ISO 8502-6 and 8502-9;
- Roughness: medium grit according to ISO 8503-1. 
With these crierias, you can well perform your job according to not subjective results and pronounce the reception of the job before going on in the process of painting.

From M Ehab of North Valley on March 21, 2012:
Best Efforts have no physical meaning. The safer method is to follow Paint Data Sheet Surface Preparation Recommendations.  If not available, blast to ISO Sa 2.5  (SSPC-SP 10/NACE #2 or similar grades).  In case of HPFW. Hand/Power Cleaning ISO St2/St3 (SSPC SP-2/SP-3) if primer is a surface-tolerant coating.

From Jim Brown of Corrosion Prevention on February 21, 2012:
When conditions prevent an inspector from reaching, seeing or touching an area, the criteria of “best effort” will exist. The facility owner knows of the condition before and thus lists it in the RFP.

Please sign in to submit your answer this question    

Tagged categories: Abrasive blasting; Specification; Specification writing


Current PSF Question | Submit a PSF Question | Full PSF Archive

Advertisements
 
Graco Inc.
 
Graco EcoQuip 2: Experience the Difference
 
While others claim their equipment is the same, none of them compare to Graco’s EcoQuip 2™ Vapor Abrasive® blasting line. Visit graco.com/ecoquip to learn more.
 

 
NLB Corporation
 
NLB Sure Shroud: Greater Protection and Flexibility
 
NLB’s Sure Shroud’s lighter weight and flexibility reduces operator fatigue and offers unmatched protection against high pressure hose ruptures. 10k to 40k psi rated.
 

 
SABRE Autonomous Solutions
 
Quality
 
The ALPHA1 provides a consistent finish day-in
day-out; job to job.
 

 
Novatek Corporation
 
Dustless Coatings Removal
 
Novatek Corporation, Dustless Coatings Removal Strip, clean and profile all dust free! Comply with new lead standards. Contact today: (866) 563-7800 www.Novatekco.com
 

 
Industrial Vacuum Equipment Corp.
 
Hurricane Vacuums
& Dust Collectors
 
Vacuum and dust collector hose, filters and related accessories.
IndustrialVacuum.com
 

 
CHLOR*RID International Inc.
 
SOLUTIONS THAT WORK
 
Companies that invest in corrosion control use CHLOR RID products
  • Soluble salt removal liquid
  • Test kits to verify contamination levels
  • Surface passivation to hold the blast
INFO@CHLOR-RID.COM 800.422.3217
 

 
Absolute Equipment/Grand Rental Station
 
TIER 4 EQUIPMENT
 
We have Tier 4 Equipment including Air Compressors & Generators for Sale & Rent! Your job may now require Tier-4. www.absoluteequip.com or Call 412-931-6655.
 

 
Jotun Paints Inc.
 
Jotun Jotachar 1709
 
Mesh-free passive fire protection epoxy designed to protect against hydrocarbon pool fire scenarios for up to four hours as defined in the ANSI/UL1709 standard.
 

 
DeFelsko Corporation
 
PosiTector SST Soluble Salt Tester
 
Measures the concentration of soluble salts on metal surfaces. Use with all Bresle patch types including the reusable, adhesive-free PosiPatch.
 

 
Vector Technologies Ltd.
 
The Original Performance Proven Vacuum Solutions
 
VecLoader® 616 Double Dump, Continuous Vacuum, 170 HP w/ 2,400 CFM & 28” Hg. 33% More Efficient than traditional vacuum systems! Choose Vector for the most powerful and the most reliable trailer mounted vacuums in the industry! Email us at: inquiry@vector-vacuums.com or call us at: 800-832-4010
 

 
 
 

Technology Publishing Co., 1501 Reedsdale Street, Suite 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 15233

TEL 1-412-431-8300  • FAX  1-412-431-5428  •  EMAIL webmaster@paintsquare.com


The Technology Publishing Network

Durability + Design PaintSquare the Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings Paint BidTracker

 
EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About PaintSquare.com   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms & Conditions   |   Support   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us