| Connect Follow us on Twitter Like us on Facebook
About | Subscribe | Advertise


Download our free Transmission Pipeline Coating Systems eResource Book

Paint and Coatings Industry News

Main News Page

Mall Study: Extreme Corrosion Unnoticed

Monday, March 25, 2013

More items for Program/Project Management

Comment | More

The only surprise in last summer's fatal cave-in at an Ontario shopping mall is that it didn't happen a lot sooner.

That is the sobering conclusion of a 700-page forensic study by the global engineering firm NORR, which found failures and shortcomings at every stage of the complex: from design, to materials selection, to construction practices, to maintenance during more than 30 decades of ruinous leaks.

From its first day to its last, water intrusion at the Algo Centre Mall was so pervasive and severe that corrosion of the steel support structures was akin to that seen in a marine environment, the engineers' report found. Indeed, corrosion of steel beams was noted in some inspections even before the complex opened in 1980.

“It is, in fact, somewhat surprising that failure did not happen earlier,” the engineers concluded in the report conducted for the Ontario Provincial Police.

Algo Collapse
NORR report / Ontario Provincial Police

The Algo Centre Mall collapse in Ontario last year killed two women and injured two dozen people.   A new engineering report has become a key piece of evidence in the investigation into the accident.

The parking deck situated on top of the shopping mall caved in June 23, 2012, killing Lucie Aylwin, 37, and Doloris Perizzoli, 74, and injuring two dozen people.

A 142-page excerpt of the report was released Tuesday (March 19) as part of the Elliot Lake Inquiry, a public hearing into the collapse.

The report has become a key piece of evidence in the probe, which began March 4.

Advanced Corrosion 'Unnoticed'

The engineering firm reported that corrosion levels observed after the collapse were at levels typical of marine environments.

Most of the shopping mall’s beams’ top flanges, bolts, welds and angles had severe to very severe corrosion, the report found. Such advanced degradation would normally trigger rehabilitation or replacement if the extent affected the overall performance of the member.

“It is not entirely clear how this situation went unnoticed for such an extended period of time,” the report said.

Structural Inspections Faulted

NORR said numerous inspections, including some by structural engineers, had generally underestimated the severity of the corrosion. Some of the most advanced corrosion examples noted in the report were found “in plain sight," the authors said.

NORR report

A number of locations in the steel frame showed signs of very severe corrosion. Here, severe corrosion is seen in the angle and weld of the connection at gridline intersection G-12 and the beam connected to the West flange of the column.

For example, steel on a pedestrian walkway had corroded to the point where some plates were completely depleted, NORR said.

"One is hard pressed to find a similar example where carbon-steel framed building in North America or Europe continued to corrode to the point of failure, when no extreme loading is present,” NORR said.

“Occupied steel buildings are assumed to be kept in dry conditions which are not conductive to corrosion,” according to the engineering firm. Thus, inspecting buildings for corrosion is not typically called for, it said.

On the other hand, the leakage reported at the building would have raised flags for the owner and those engineers inspecting the structure over the years. But none of the engineers’ reports raised an alarm regarding the corroding steel frame or suggested monitoring the situation, the report said.

Waterproofing, Core Slabs

Water leaked at the mall from the day it opened until the day it collapsed, including the period right after a limited waterproofing system was installed.

“Its ramifications potentially could have been avoided if a proper waterproofing system with a continuous membrane was installed at the outset,” NORR said.

Elliot Lake Commission

The report indicated that the chronic leaks could have been solved after construction if not for “a deficiency in the capacity of the hollow core slabs.”

Previous testimony in the Elliot Lake Inquiry detailed the original waterproofing system supplied by Harry S. Peterson Co. The report concluded that the system selected and used did not work—and neither did the years of attempted repairs and remedies.

The report also indicated that the leakage problem could have been solved after construction had it not been for “a deficiency in the capacity of the hollow core slabs.”

The report alleges that Coreslab, the pre-cast concrete manufacturer based in Burlington, Ontario, and structural engineer John Kadlec misled the mall’s owner about the capabilities of the system in an “aggressive effort to win a competitive tender.”

An eight-inch slab to take 120 psf superimposed load was specified by the design.

“According to Coreslab’s tables this slab is not achievable for the 30’ spans of the mall even with the highest level of prestressing,” the report said. “Coreslab could have advised the owner accordingly, as did their competitor Precon, and risk losing the tender but they did not.”

Failed Weld

The combination of road salt and water had a lethal effect on the steel structure, according to the report. 

With corrosion levels so severe, it took just one car driving over an unstable welded connection between a support column and beam to cause the cave-in. The collapse was short, lasting for one second, the engineers’ report said.

The welded connection had been so heavily depleted by years of corrosion that a passing SUV was the “last straw the connections could take,” according to the report. The weld was found to have lost more than 85 percent of its as-built nominal capacity by the time of failure.

video stills
NORR report

Surveillance footage of the connection failure shows the moment of the roof deck's collapse. The SUV cleared the failed section just as it gave way.

When the connection was lost, the beam couldn’t support the roof parking deck, and the concrete panels fell onto the Upper Mall Level and caused a similar collapse, the report noted.

The report also found that concrete slab movement had been reported at the location of the collapse in 2009.

Building Envelope: 'Poor Practice'

NORR also criticized the design, construction and materials used in the building envelope, saying that the parties had not exercised their required duty of care.

“The choice of placing a parking deck on top of a public mall was an unfortunate one,” the firm concluded. The design of the structure has previously been called into question during the inquiry.

Relying on a “waterproofing sealer material to maintain the integrity of a building envelope is considered poor practice,” the firm said.

JohnKadlec RodCaughill

Architect John Kadlec (left) testified that he had approved the project, despite evidence of construction problems. Rod Caughill, representing the original owner, said the firm rejected an engineer's waterproofing recommendations.

“Let alone having the material as a horizontal layer guaranteed to be covered in water and snow, and subjected to vehicular traffic.

“The lack of roof drain detailing is troubling and does not speak well of the level of care given to the design of the roof.”

While indicating that having a parking deck act as a roof over occupied spaces is challenging from a construction detailing angle, the report said it was not an “insurmountable challenge.”

But, in this case, material choices and assembly details failed to rise to the level of “sophistication and durability required.”

“Simply adding a layer of insulation and a fragile layer of waterproofing to either side of a parking deck does not transform it into a roof that should be placed over the public’s head,” the report concluded.

The forensic report involved field inspection, in-situ testing, laboratory testing, analysis of test results and modeling of failed structural components and the review of documents.


Tagged categories: Accidents; Architecture; Building design; Construction; Corrosion; Corrosion protection; Engineers; Fatalities; Steel

Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.

SAFE Systems, Inc.
Custom blast rooms
by SAFE Systems

Don't waste time and money "making do" with a "standard" design. Let us work with you to design and build the
system that best fits
your requirements.
Call 1-800-634-7278

Armakleen Company, The
ARMEX when nondestructive cleaning is critical

The gentle physical propriety of baking soda but yet aggressive cleaning ability is what makes ARMEX the only choice for nondestructive abrasive blasting.

Termarust Technologies
Termarust (HR CSA) Chemically Stops
Active Corrosion

Pipeline Utility Aerial crossings coated since 1992. Termarust's (HR CSA) was used to overcoat lead paint and preserve cables, pipes and support towers.

Midsun Specialty Products
Stopaq 30+ Year Coatings

Use Stopaq corrosion prevention coatings on pipelines, field joints, tank chimes, structural steel and more. Learn more at

Polyurethane and Polyurea Sprayed-On Protection

Buy POLYURETHANE or POLYUREA coatings and spray equipment for years of proven chemical resistance, water- and weather-proofing, and structural improvements.

CS Unitec
Surface Prep & Material Removal

CS Unitec’s Floor Planers remove coatings & corrosion from concrete & metal surfaces. Produce keyed profiles for waterproofing applications.

U.S. Zinc
Historic Reliability. Innovative Performance.

As an industry leader with an established global footprint, we provide the products that prolong the life your paints and coatings. U.S. Zinc – Helping the world work™

LS Industries
LS Blasters: Optimum Steel Cleaning Efficiency

Simplify surface prep with the precise shot control of LS Blasters. Our blast technology delivers optimum coverage and finish. 800-533-8008

Tinker & Rasor
Holiday Detectors Made in the USA

When it comes to coating inspection, get the right instrument for the job. Tinker & Rasor pulse –type DC holiday detectors come standard with the widest voltage range available, 800 volts to 35,000 volts in one instrument.

Technology Publishing

The Technology Publishing Network

The Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings (JPCL) PaintSquare
Durability + Design Paint BidTracker

EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About   |   Privacy policy   |   Terms & conditions   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us

© Copyright 2000-2015, Technology Publishing / PaintSquare, All rights reserved
2100 Wharton Street, Suite 310, Pittsburgh PA 15203-1951; Tel 1-412-431-8300; Fax 1-412-431-5428; E-mail