PaintSquare.com


The First Word in Protective & Marine Coatings

A Product of Technology Publishing / PaintSquare
JPCL | PaintSquare News | Durability + Design | Paint BidTracker

Bridge Coating Systems: Selecting and Sourcing

Paint and Coatings Industry News

Main News Page


Monument Deemed Stained But Sound

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

More items for Quality Control

Comment | More

The corrosion of the St. Louis Gateway Arch—the nation’s tallest monument—is “a cosmetic problem” that does not affect the structure’s integrity, an in-depth engineering analysis has concluded.

A two-year study of the Arch’s creeping interior and exterior corrosion has determined that the structure “is in excellent structural shape,” according to the National Park Service.

 National Park Service

 Photos: National Park Service

The stainless steel exterior of the nation’s tallest monument was never coated. Experts in the 1950s considered stainless steel rustproof.

“The staining on the exterior is a cosmetic problem for which the engineers proposed several solutions,” the Park Service said.

Structural Study

The Park Service commissioned a structural study in September 2010 to determine the cause and extent of the decay on the Arch’s stainless-steel exterior and carbon-steel interior.

The monument’s exterior never received a protective coating, because planners of the 1950s considered stainless steel impervious to corrosion. They said cleaning every 50 years was all that was required for the structure to last 1,000 years. The Arch was completed in 1965 and opened in 1967.

A protective coating was applied to the interior, but the reinforced-concrete-and-steel structure has never been recoated or even thoroughly cleaned.

In 2006, a study commissioned by the Park Service noted corroding bolt heads and staircases; a rusting interior; and a degenerating exterior. But no action was taken until 2010, when the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported and showed the spreading staining along the length of the 630-foot-tall monument.

Drilling and Sampling

The 2010 study was conducted by Wiss, Janney, and Elstner Associates of Northbrook, IL.

The $325,000 project included drilling concrete core samples; installing monitors above the 300-foot level to analyze steel composition and damage; and determining the source of the moisture infiltration—a chronic plague that channels water down the structure’s massive legs.

 National Park Service
A key area of corrosion is the base of the Gateway Arch legs. This is a September 2010 photo from the north leg.

The work also involved comparing the Arch to other structures of similar vintage and composition.

Welds, Rogue Metals Cited

The conclusion: The Arch has fared more poorly in some ways than similar structures, the Park Service conceded.

“Research revealed that other stainless steel structures have not suffered the same exterior staining as the Arch, leading the engineers to believe that the welds that hold the Arch's sections together may be the culprit,” the Park Service reported in a release.

The agency said engineers involved in the analysis had concluded thus:

"The Gateway Arch stands alone from other buildings and monuments researched in its extensive use of shop and field welds. Many of the discolorations of concern are caused by atmospheric pollutants or inadequate cleaning and polishing of the Arch after erection.

“In addition, if a metal other than the exact type of stainless steel the Arch is made of (Type 304) got into the welds when they were made, the rogue metals might be the cause of the staining. The report notes that whatever the cause, the corrosion is natural and minor, and does not threaten the integrity of the welds or the structure.”

Nasty Habits

The monument's four million annual guests aren't helping the situation.

Aggravating the natural corrosion is the “unfortunate and growing habit of visitors who carve their names into the exterior base of the Arch legs,” the Park Service reported.

“The carved graffiti (which is a federal offense) shows streaking similar to the welds higher up, and will also be treated to try to eliminate it and to repair the damage. The cleaning of this graffiti might be followed up with a clear coating of some type to prevent future damage.”

4-Step Process

The study is the second step in a four-part process, the Park Service said.

The engineers have recommended additional close-up testing of the welds “to determine the best method of cleaning the metal and stopping the [exterior] streaking at its source.”

Samples also will be taken from the exterior and studied to determine the exact type of corrosion present, the Park Service said.

The final step will be “a gentle cleaning of the stainless steel surfaces and dressing and polishing the original welds to reduce future staining.”

The Park Service press release did not mention any of the internal corrosion cited in earlier reports.

Getting There

Testing the lower welds will be easier than reaching those higher up, the agency noted, “and some sort of rappelling solution—similar to what was recently done on the exterior of the earthquake-damaged Washington Monument—may be necessary to reach the upper welds.”

At 555 feet, the Washington Monument is 75 feet shorter than the Arch.

Arch Superintendent Tom Bradley called the new report’s conclusions “good news for all of us.”

“We now know that St. Louis's most iconographic structure is in good health,” said Bradley. “The Arch may be a little discolored in some places, but we are now certain that it is part of the aging process, and we will work to keep this one of a kind structure in the best shape possible for future generations.

“It may take some time to get up there to clean it, but we will get it done."

   

Tagged categories: Corrosion; Facility Managers; Historic Structures; Metal cleaning; Monuments; Protective coatings; Steel

Comment from william house, (10/3/2012, 8:14 AM)

The stainless steel used for this structure is stated to be type 304. It may have made more sense for a welded fabrication to use at leaset type 304L due ti its lower carbon content.


Comment from Richard D Rockett, (10/3/2012, 9:27 AM)

The "Arch" is the most advanced engineering landmark project of the twentieth century. Been there and was quite moved/ impressed by the vision related to


Comment from Tom Schwerdt, (10/3/2012, 9:45 AM)

I would suspect staining in the lower graffiti would be caused by traces of carbon steel left behind by the carving tools. Similarly, if the welds and HAZ were not re-passivated/pickled after welding, a chromium-depleted surface layer would allow staining to occour - even if the proper weld metal was used. As mentioned by William, 304L has less of an issue with this problem.


Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.

KTA-Tator, Inc. - Corporate Office
KTA-TATOR LABORATORY SERVICES

• Coating failure analysis
• Independent
  comparative testing
• Accelerated
  weathering testing
• Toxic metals testing
• A2LA Accredited
800-245-6379


Elcometer, Inc.
Elcometer 106 Pull-Off Adhesion Tester

Portable, easy to operate; Provides numerical value for adhesion; Comes in carrying case - Ideal for site tests; No power supply necessary.


JPCL Europe
Don’t miss an issue!

JPCL EUROPE offers essential news and knowledge for protective and marine coatings professionals in Europe, the Middle East and Africa. Subscribe now: www.jpcleurope.com


DeFelsko Corporation
PosiTector Dew Point Meter

Measures and records
environmental conditions
during surface prep and
painting. 4 Models
Available – Standard
or Advanced features,
Built-in or Separate probe.


Termarust Technologies
Termarust (HR CSA) Chemically Stops
Active Corrosion

Pipeline Utility Aerial crossings coated since 1992. Termarust's (HR CSA) was used to overcoat lead paint and preserve cables, pipes and support towers.


U.S. Zinc

The proven corrosion protection properties of our zinc dust prolong the life of marine coatings. U.S. Zinc – Helping the world work™


SSPC: The Society for Protective Coatings
http://www.sspc.org/

Join SSPC and Enhance
Your Career !

 
 
 
Technology Publishing

The Technology Publishing Network

The Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings (JPCL) PaintSquare
Durability + Design Paint BidTracker JPCL Europe

 
EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About PaintSquare.com   |   Privacy policy   |   Terms & conditions   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us
 

© Copyright 2000-2014, Technology Publishing / PaintSquare, All rights reserved
2100 Wharton Street, Suite 310, Pittsburgh PA 15203-1951; Tel 1-412-431-8300; Fax 1-412-431-5428; E-mail webmaster@paintsquare.com