PaintSquare.com


The First Word in Protective & Marine Coatings

A Product of Technology Publishing / PaintSquare
JPCL | PaintSquare News | Durability + Design | Paint BidTracker

Chemical & Petrochemical Plant Coating Systems

Paint and Coatings Industry News

Main News Page


New Suit Reignites Obama Ozone Battle

Friday, October 14, 2011

More items for Environmental Controls

Comment | More

As expected, public health and conservation groups have revived their effort to force the federal government to tighten ground-level ozone standards—an uphill battle that the Obama Administration retreated from just last month.

On Sept. 2, the Administration announced that it had instructed the Environmental Protection Agency to withdraw a long-delayed, much-disliked rule that would have reduced federal smog standards below those set by the George W. Bush Administration.

 President Barack Obama and EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson
EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson favored tougher limits, saying the Bush-era standard was “not legally defensible.”

The decision to delay the rule indefinitely drew praise from the coatings industry, Republicans, utilities, oil and gas companies, and the manufacturing sector—but clean-air advocates warned that the issue was not over.

‘Illegal and Irresponsible’

On Tuesday (Oct. 11), the American Lung Association, Environmental Defense Fund, Natural Resources Defense Council, and Appalachian Mountain Club returned to federal court to make good on that threat, filing suit against the Obama Administration over its refusal to set the tougher standards.

“The rejection of stronger standards was illegal and irresponsible in our view,” said attorney David Baron of the nonprofit environmental law firm Earthjustice, which is representing the plaintiffs.

 “Instead of protecting people’s lungs as the law requires, this administration based its decision on politics, leaving tens of thousands of Americans at risk of sickness and suffering.”

The American Coatings Association, which represents coating manufacturers and fought the tougher ozone standards, had no immediate comment on the new litigation.

Scientific Mandate

As unpopular as the ozone proposal was, more than political pressure is at stake in the dispute.

The ozone emission standards, which are subject to regular review, have been stalled at 84 parts per billion (ppb) since 1997. In setting a new standard of 75 ppb, Bush’s EPA rejected a recommendation by the independent Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC) that the levels be set between 60 and 70 ppb.

Because federal mandates require that new standards be based on current scientific findings, the ALA and other groups filed suit to force the stricter standard.

That litigation was put on hold for nearly two years, however, as the Obama EPA worked to develop a rule that would comply with the CASAC’s recommendation. EPA Administration Lisa Jackson was a fierce proponent of the lower limits, predicting legal action if the Administration did not deliver them.

Jeopardizing Health

The former and current plaintiffs in the case agree.

“It is critical to move forward with a science-based standard that reduces smog and protects public health,” said Peter Zalzal, an attorney with Environmental Defense Fund.

“The Administration’s decision to reject a more health-protective standard for smog puts thousands of Americans’ lives at risk and ignores a unanimous recommendation by the leading experts on this issue, EPA’s scientific advisory board.”

Rejecting tighter ozone standards “jeopardizes the health of millions of Americans,” said ALA president and CEO Charles D. Connor.

The main component of smog and the most widespread air pollutant, ground-level ozone is linked to premature deaths, increased asthma attacks and breathing problems, especially for children, seniors and people with lung diseases.

   

Tagged categories: Air quality; EPA; Regulations

Comment from John Corley, (10/14/2011, 2:28 PM)

EPA needs to go--too much regulations for our industries to survive Federal Gov. needs to focus on defending the country--stop regulating, get out of education and stop spending!


Comment from M. Halliwelll, (10/17/2011, 10:33 AM)

Unfortunately, John, people buy based on price and companies make decisions based on profit. Without groups like the EPA and OHSA, I think worker health and safety and the environment would take massive hits... I think both organizations need a shake-up and need to better enforce what is already on the books before more regs are added, but to abolish either or both would be a serious mistake. I do agree, though, that the US gov't needs to get its fiscal house in order...very soon.


Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.

Modern Safety Techniques
Modern Safety Techniques

See our Low Temperature Catalyst for your CO removal needs. Help to provide your workers with safe, comfortable breathing air!


Blastox/The TDJ Group, Inc.
Blastox - One Step
Lead Abatement

Don't waste $$ on added labor steps with other methods. Don't mix, meter or apply at the job-site. Avoid strict hazardous waste rules.
Let your painters paint!


Sherwin-Williams
Heat-FLex® Hi-Temp 1200

Improved Corrosion
Resistance
Enhanced Durability
Faster Shop Throughput


U.S. Zinc

With multiple locations, ample capacity and a proven safety record, U.S. Zinc offers supply security to customers around the globe. Helping the world work™


MMLJ
Superfast Dustless Abrasive Blasting - Watch Video

Dustless Blasting creates no dust plume so others can work nearby unaffected. Maximize Productivity! Watch our numerous YouTube videos to learn more.


Wasser High-Tech Coatings Inc.
Wasser Coatings Protect

some of the most important bridges in the country; learn about our NEPCOAT-approved system and our entire range of MCU & Polyurea coatings. 1-800-627-2968 www.wassercoatings.com


Spider, a Division of SafeWorks, LLC
Spider’s Competent Person Training

What will Spider’s CPT class do for you?
• OSHA compliance
• Increased productivity
• Improved safety
   awareness
• Fewer accident-related
   costs
Call 877-774-3370 or click for classes near you.

 
 
 
Technology Publishing

The Technology Publishing Network

The Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings (JPCL) PaintSquare
Durability + Design Paint BidTracker JPCL Europe

 
EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About PaintSquare.com   |   Privacy policy   |   Terms & conditions   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us
 

© Copyright 2000-2014, Technology Publishing / PaintSquare, All rights reserved
2100 Wharton Street, Suite 310, Pittsburgh PA 15203-1951; Tel 1-412-431-8300; Fax 1-412-431-5428; E-mail webmaster@paintsquare.com