| Connect Follow us on Twitter Like us on Facebook
About | Subscribe | Advertise


Download our free Transmission Pipeline Coating Systems eResource Book

Paint and Coatings Industry News

Main News Page

MA Road, Bridge Delays Line Pockets

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

More items for Program/Project Management

Comment | More

“Overdue and over budget” is more than a phrase in Massachusetts. It’s become a way of life for many of the state’s road and bridge projects.

Nearly half of all road and bridge projects in the state are over budget, and more than one-third are not completed on time, an investigation by the New England Center for Investigative Reporting has found.

The delays result in contract extensions that put thousands of extra work days on the state’s construction calendar and millions of dollars in contractors’ pockets¸ the center reports.

155,008 Extra Work Days

In the last four fiscal years alone, contractors had 155,008 extra work days added to their construction schedules — equivalent to nearly 425 years — and billed the state more than $352 million in cost overruns on hundreds of road and bridge projects throughout Massachusetts, the investigation found.

 Boston Big Dig Project
Boston’s “Big Dig” project, budgeted at $14 billion, ran $12 billion over budget and was years behind schedule.

Projects still underway will add $127 million and nearly 43,000 days to those figures.

The analysis is based on data obtained from the Massachusetts Department of Transportation. The center also offers an interactive breakdown of projects.

Budget Busters

Topping the list of budget-busting projects is the Fore River Bridge linking Quincy and Weymouth—a project originally priced at $58 million that grew to $87.9 million. A second phase, including construction of a new bridge, will cost an additional $299 million.

No. 2 on the list is a project to relocate Route 44 in Plymouth. Budgeted at $34 million, it ended up costing an additional $23 million and ran nearly 2,200 days past the original deadline.

Among other examples:

• An $8.8 million repaving project along a stretch of I-93 came in at $10.5 million and two years’ overdue; and

• A Park & Ride facility in Andover cost an extra $207,000.

‘You Can’t Open a Vault’

Cost overruns and delays on public works projects have long been a concern for fiscal watchdog groups like the Project on Government Oversight, the center reports.

“You can’t open a vault filled with money. That just doesn’t work,” said Scott Amey, general counsel for group, based in Washington, D.C. “The government needs to do everything it can to protect itself and the taxpayers so that contracts don’t end up over budget and behind schedule.”

“Lessons of extensive time delays and construction shortfalls learned from the Central Artery Tunnel Project, better known as ‘The Big Dig,’ seem lost in the four years since 2007, when that $14 billion project faced $12 billion in cost overruns and was years behind schedule,” the center reports

“Today, Massachusetts continues to struggle to bring construction projects in on deadline and on budget.”

Extension, Extension, Extension

In 2010, taxpayers shelled out more than $8 million to cover construction costs that added about 4,000 calendar days—more than 10 years—to road and bridge projects in the Bay State.

“From drain cleaning and sign installation to a ‘weave elimination project’ on the Massachusetts Turnpike, cost overruns and missed deadlines have taken a collective bite from at least half of the 1,212 road and bridge contracts signed by MassDOT since 2008,” the center said.

One of the state’s longest-running projects was a 10-year-old venture to install an intelligent transportation management system that controls and monitors traffic along a 25-mile stretch of Route 128. Started in July 1998 and scheduled for completion in April 2004, the project overseen by Liddell Brothers lasted an additional five years and topped out at $9.6 million—$3.1 million more than its original contract price and nine years beyond its scheduled completion date, MassDOT records note.

The Halifax-based contractor on that project signed a total of 23 contracts with the state since 1998, topping its budget 10 times and adding $2 million in overruns and more than 4,500 extra work days to the final cost.

The most costly project, however, involved a series of structural repair projects by N E L Corp. that started in 2004. Originally budgeted at $1.5 million, cost overruns put the final pricetage at $8.9 million after just four years, MassDOT data indicates.

N E L Corp. has signed 56 contracts with MassDOT, 19 of them with cost overruns totaling about $40 million and eight in which completion deadlines were extended by more than 7,000 days.


Representatives from the construction companies either declined comment or did not return phone calls to the center’s reporters.

But John Pourbaix, executive director of Construction Industries of Massachusetts, a trade organization that represents many contractors who do business with the state, said several factors affect the bottom line in almost all construction projects. Weather and environmental concerns, design flaws and utility relocation issues all mean delays, he notes. And as delays mount, so do costs.

“Believe me, a contractor would love to get in and get out as quickly as possible,” Pourbaix said. “It’s extremely expensive in terms of overhead in equipment and bidding opportunities” to deal with delays.

MassDOT officials said changes to work orders along with scheduling, site and other issues likely contributed to increased cost and later completion dates on those projects and others, as well. In fact, extra work orders and design changes or omissions cause 86 percent of all internal delays, a MassDOT study shows.

‘Our Projects Aren’t Given Priority’

Schedule extensions also were due to external factors, including changed surface conditions, inclement weather and delays by utility companies in relocating equipment. Those factors contribute to 69 percent of all delays caused by external conditions in 2010, that same study notes.

Michael McGrath, deputy chief engineer for construction with MassDOT, said utility company relocation delays are also a factor, accounting for 28 percent of the delays in 2010.

“Because we’re not a revenue source for them, our projects aren’t given priority,” he said.

Amy Zorich, spokeswoman for National Grid, said the number of utilities and other construction demands associated with complex relocation work can extend deadlines.

“We do our best to work cooperatively with the state to make sure projects go smoothly, but there are a lot of things that go into projects that affect the timing,” said Zorich.

‘Mileage Fees’ Eyed

Whatever the cause or causes, Massachusetts transportation officials are working to turn the numbers around.

“Our goal is to have 80 percent of our highway projects completed on time in fiscal 2011,” says Thomas Broderick, acting chief engineer for the state’s Highway Division. “We want to make sure we’re showing constant improvement.”

To that end, the state legislature could soon begin studying a plan to impose mileage-based fees on drivers to generate that needed revenue.

Some say that’s not enough; they want to hold contractors more accountable. “When the taxpayers’ money is at stake, there’s no disincentive—no financial or business consequences,” said Thomas Schatz, president of Citizens Against Government Waste.

Schatz said MassDOT can curb costs by offering incentives for a job well done and penalties for contractors who breech deadlines or overspend budgets.

MassDOT spokesman Adam Hurtubise said the state recently began using incentive clauses in some contracts, including one dubbed “Fast 14,” a program designed to replace 14 bridge decks on I-93 in Medford during the summer.

Under that program, part of the state’s Accelerated Bridge Replacement effort, contractors can earn up to $7 million in incentives if they adhere to a contract provision requiring bridges closed for weekend repairs be reopened to traffic by 5 a.m. each Monday. Contractors who miss the deadline can face penalties of $450,000 and up.

So far, the roadway has opened ahead of schedule each weekend, Hurtubise said.


Tagged categories: Bidding; Industrial Contractors; Mass transit; Project Management; Roads/Highways

Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.

Chicago Corrosion Group
Vendor-neutral corrosion consulting

When reliability is paramount.
For more information,
call 877-516-9514

SAFE Systems, Inc.
Enduroguard -
The Tough Cable
for a Tough Industry.

Reduce maintenance costs and down time, increase job site safety with Enduroguard Cable. Available exclusively from SAFE Systems. UL listed, flexible, abrasion resistant and cut resistant.

Nationwide Overspray
Profession Overspray Removal Services

The Finest Name in Safe Overspray Removal. We specialize in removing all contaminants from any surface. Family Owned and Operated for 33 years! Fully insured. Satisfaction is guaranteed.

SSPC: The Society for Protective Coatings

Join SSPC and Enhance
Your Career !

PPG Protective and Marine Coatings Group
Industrial strength performance in ONE can.

Now get the durability and protection of two components in one can: Amercoat® ONE, PSX® ONE and Sigmadur ONE.

Ethox Chemicals LLC
Ethoflex® ER instantly upgrades your epoxy!

The only epoxy additive that improves flexibility, corrosion resistance, toughness, and adhesion, without hurting pot life, cure time, or increasing VOCs.


Download the free app for BLACK BEAUTY® Abrasives. Explore all the features from the palm of your hand.
Toll Free: 1-888-733-3646

NLB Corporation
MiniARM automates surface prep

NLB’s Mini ARM lets an operator control high-pressure water jets remotely, with fast tool changes for different jobs. It maximizes protection and productivity.

W Abrasives : Maintenance Pack

The blasting company able to reduce your maintenance costs up to 30% by fine-tuning consumption, and increasing productivity. Visit us during the GIFA (Hall15 - D14).

Armakleen Company, The
ARMEX when nondestructive cleaning is critical

Use ARMEX to clean, remove paint and degrease a wide variety of substrates including metals, plastics, composites and masonry materials like brick, concrete and natural stone.

Technology Publishing

The Technology Publishing Network

The Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings (JPCL) PaintSquare
Durability + Design Paint BidTracker

EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About   |   Privacy policy   |   Terms & conditions   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us

© Copyright 2000-2015, Technology Publishing / PaintSquare, All rights reserved
2100 Wharton Street, Suite 310, Pittsburgh PA 15203-1951; Tel 1-412-431-8300; Fax 1-412-431-5428; E-mail