| Connect Follow us on Twitter Like us on Facebook
About | Subscribe | Advertise


Download our free e-book! Surface Preparation & Safety

Paint and Coatings Industry News

Main News Page

EPA Seeks Public Input on Reg Review

Monday, February 21, 2011

More items for Program/Project Management

Comment | More

President Obama

The embattled U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is inviting public comment on a plan that will guide EPA’s internal review of its regulations as part of a government-wide regulatory review.

The review was triggered Jan. 18 by President Obama’s 2011 Executive Order (EO) 13563, “Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review.”

EO 13563 directs each federal agency to consider “how best to promote retrospective analysis of rules that may be outmoded, ineffective, insufficient, or excessively burdensome.”

The order calls on every agency to develop “a preliminary plan, consistent with law and its resources and regulatory priorities, under which the agency will periodically review its existing significant regulations to determine whether such regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded or repealed to make the agency’s regulatory program more effective and or less burdensome in achieving its regulatory objectives.”

Targeting ‘Dumb’ Regulations

The order takes aim at federal regulations that, Obama said, “stifle job creation and make our economy less competitive.”

Obama said the government would “root out regulations that conflict, that are not worth the cost, or that are just plain dumb.”

The review follows widespread and growing criticism by many industries that several Obama agencies—led by EPA and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration—have been proposing and enacting regulations that accomplish little while killing jobs and choking economic growth.

The review has already prompted OSHA to withdraw an occupational noise proposal and a proposal on musculoskeletal injury reporting.

‘Common Sense and Transparency’

In inviting public input on its review, EPA said it shared Obama’s “commitment to using common sense and transparency to review federal regulations.”

The agency said it would post its plan on the EPA website through March 20, hold a public meeting on the review March 14 in Washington DC, and schedule “listening sessions” on the proposal at various locations nationwide.

The plan, and the regulations targeted for review, will be available in May, EPA said. For more information about the review, visit For information about environmental laws and regulations, visit


Tagged categories: EPA; Government; OSHA; Regulations

Comment from Catherine Brooks, (2/23/2011, 10:29 AM)

I hope the grumbling about RRP implementation will not suggest that the whole rule be trashed. Lead-safe work practices should be commonplace. Yes, it can be more expensive for contractors, but their customers' and workers' health need protection. Your other articles tell about the trend back to refurbishing older homes instead of demolishing them or building new ones. The denial of the dangers of lead paint will continue unless the public knows to demand protection.

Comment from Terry Singleton, (2/23/2011, 11:05 AM)

Sorry, but we live in the real world where laws are passed (such as the RRP rule) and yet, there is no possible way to enforce them. What that means is that legitimate contractors, who have something to lose, play by the rules while all of the others completely ignore them. Meanwhile, the guys that ignore the rules are working while the certified companies are out of work. Whose lives are we saving that way? Also, no one ever mentions Cal EPA regulations that will drive a typical job price up by OVER 400 PERCENT. In California, we are required to have all paint testing done by an electronic gun(no do-it-yourself kits), all waste must be characterized by more expensive testing prior to disposal and, last but not least, all waste with lead paint has to be put in hazardous waste disposal ($600 for a 50 gal drum, $6,000 for a dumpster). Please, guess why no one is saving lives by playing by the RRP rule? What are my workers supposed to tell their families when they don't have a paycheck?

Comment from Kathy Day, (2/23/2011, 7:11 PM)

Regulations such as RRP which can't or won't be enforced hurt all of us. Certified contractors lose work because their customers demand lower prices, not extra protection. Legitimate contractors risk fines over $30,000, but homeowners risk no fines at all. Less-reputable contractors can risk the small chance they will be caught or closed down. They won't pay a fine if they don't have the money & they can re-open under a different name. We are 10 months into this RRP lead rule, but has there been a reported violation? An estimated 3.2 renovations will fall under the rule this year. Who is doing the work & is it legal? Before this rule, my firm did these jobs & made the effort to collect much (but not all) of the lead dust. Uncertified companies don't care about any of this lead exposure for their customers or employees. Homeowners (who live in older houses) get more exposure now, not less. Legal companies go out of business. Who is helped by this law? Enforce the RRP regulation or get rid of it.

Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.

Ethox Chemicals LLC
Ethoflex® ER instantly upgrades your epoxy!

The only epoxy additive that improves flexibility, corrosion resistance, toughness, and adhesion, without hurting pot life, cure time, or increasing VOCs.

PPG Protective and Marine Coatings Group
Industrial strength performance in ONE can.

Now get the durability and protection of two components in one can: Amercoat® ONE, PSX® ONE and Sigmadur ONE.

Nationwide Overspray
Profession Overspray Removal Services

The Finest Name in Safe Overspray Removal. We specialize in removing all contaminants from any surface. Family Owned and Operated for 33 years! Fully insured. Satisfaction is guaranteed.

SSPC: The Society for Protective Coatings

Join SSPC and Enhance
Your Career !

RPB Respiratory

With RPB Safety’s new Nova 3 Cassette Lens System which has been specifically designed to save you time and money! See the benefits for yourself now!

Blastox/The TDJ Group, Inc.
Blastox - One Step
Lead Abatement

Don't waste money on added labor steps with other methods. Don't mix, meter or apply at the job-site. Avoid strict hazardous waste rules.
Let your painters paint

Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine Coatings

With 4,000 distribution points and 3,700+ years of experience, Sherwin-Williams delivers the products, support and expertise you need, right where you need it.

SAFE Systems, Inc.
Enduroguard -
The Tough Cable
for a Tough Industry.

Reduce maintenance costs and down time, increase job site safety with Enduroguard Cable. Available exclusively from SAFE Systems. UL listed, flexible, abrasion resistant and cut resistant.

Chicago Corrosion Group
Vendor-neutral corrosion consulting

When reliability is paramount.
For more information,
call 877-516-9514

US Minerals
US Minerals -
Black Magnum

With nationwide production and distribution capabilities, U.S. Minerals supplies a complete range of coal slag and other abrasives to meet all of your blasting needs.

Technology Publishing

The Technology Publishing Network

The Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings (JPCL) PaintSquare
Durability + Design Paint BidTracker

EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About   |   Privacy policy   |   Terms & conditions   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us

© Copyright 2000-2015, Technology Publishing / PaintSquare, All rights reserved
2100 Wharton Street, Suite 310, Pittsburgh PA 15203-1951; Tel 1-412-431-8300; Fax 1-412-431-5428; E-mail