PaintSquare.com


The First Word in Protective & Marine Coatings

A Product of Technology Publishing / PaintSquare
JPCL | PaintSquare News | Durability + Design | Paint BidTracker

Download the FREE Equipment and Rental Resource Guide

Paint and Coatings Industry News

Main News Page


NTSB Issues Urgent Recommendations In Probe of Deadly Pipeline Blast

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

Comment | More

The National Transportation Safety Board has issued seven recommendations—six of them urgent—in its investigation into the pipeline explosion that killed eight people and destroyed 37 homes Sept. 9 in California.

The agency is urging pipeline operators and regulators nationwide to ensure that their system records, surveys and documents accurately reflect the infrastructure as built so that maximum safe operating pressures are calculated accurately.

The recommendations aim to address record-keeping problems that could lead to a pipeline being operated at a higher pressure than it was built to withstand, although it is not yet known if that is what happened in the accident in San Bruno, CA.

Welds Found in ‘Seamless’ Pipe

NTSB Investigation

NTSB announced Dec. 14 that the pipeline section that ruptured had been built of longitudinal seam-welded pipe, although records of pipeline operator Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) indicate that the section was seamless.

Furthermore, some seams in this section were welded from both inside and outside the pipe, while others were welded only from the outside. To understand this variation, investigators are researching standards and practices that were in effect when the pipeline was installed in 1956.

NTSB Investigation

“The NTSB is concerned that the seam-welded sections may not be as strong as the seamless pipe that was indicated in PG&E's records,” the agency said.

“Because it is critical to consider all of the characteristics of a pipeline in order to establish a safe Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure (MAOP), the NTSB believes that these inaccurate records may lead to potentially unsafe MAOPs.”

PG&E Recommendations

The NTSB issued three recommendations, two of them urgent, to PG&E, asking the utility operator to:

• Conduct an intensive records search to identify all gas transmission lines that had not previously undergone a testing regimen designed to validate a safe operating pressure (urgent);

• Determine the maximum operating pressure based on the weakest section of pipeline or component identified in the records search (urgent); and

• If unable to validate a safe operating pressure through the methods described above, determine a safe operating pressure by a specified testing regimen.

Pipeline Records Targeted

The NTSB said it was concerned that other operators may have discrepancies in their records that could compromise the safe operation of pipelines nationwide.

It therefore urged the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) to “expeditiously inform the pipeline industry” of the circumstances and findings regarding the San Bruno accident so that pipeline operators “can proactively implement any corrective measures” in their systems. It made similar recommendations to the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), which regulates intrastate pipeline operations in California.

NTSB also urged CPUC to ensure that PG&E conducts its documents and records search "aggressively and diligently" and to oversee “any testing conducted by PG&E if the document and records search cannot be satisfactorily completed.”

‘Safety-Critical Issue’

"While it may seem like a small paperwork error, if companies are basing operating pressures on inadequate or erroneous information contained in their records, safety may be compromised," said NTSB Chairman Deborah A.P. Hersman.

"We believe this safety-critical issue needs to be examined carefully to ensure that operators are accurately gauging their risk and that pipelines are being operated at pressures no higher than that for which they were built to withstand."

Inspections Questioned

The investigation has revealed no evidence of external corrosion or obvious physical damage on the ruptured pipe pieces. But those findings, in turn, have raised questions about the adequacy of PG&E’s inspections.

Experts say the utility’s reliance on direct inspection for most of its pipelines, including the San Bruno line, could not detect a variety of problems that could have led to the blast.

With direct inspection, an inspector walks along the line with an electrified pole and later digs up small sections of the pipeline. This can detect major corrosion, but it cannot detect small cracks in the line, weak points in a weld, external pressure from seismic shifts, soil bacteria that can weaken the steel, and other specific types of corrosion, two engineering experts testified in December at a legislative hearing on the disaster.

According to the San Francisco Examiner, pipeline expert Richard Kuprewicz said that the federal government allowed three types of inline inspections: hydro-pressure testing, in which a length of pipeline is filled with highly pressurized liquid to see whether it bursts; smart pigging, in which a device is run down the length of the pipeline to detect problems; and direct assessment.

However, he said, the government prefers pressure testing and smart pigging to direct assessment. He  also said that, in his experience, few utilities depended so heavily on direct assessment as PG&E, the Examiner reported.

PG&E said most pipelines in its system are not “piggable,” but they are being retrofitted, according to the Examiner.

Hearing Planned

The NTSB will hold a fact-finding public hearing March 1-2 in Washington as part of the investigation.

"This accident has exposed issues that merit further attention and have implications for the pipeline infrastructure throughout the country," said Hersman.

   

Tagged categories: Corrosion; Health and safety; Pipeline

Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.

CS Unitec
Peening Preparation Tools

CS Unitec’s hand-held scarifiers are an ideal alternative to small-area shot blasting for cleaning and preparing concrete & metal surfaces. info@csunitec.com


Novatek Corporation
Dustless Coatings Removal

Strip it, clean it, and profile it,
all dust free! High production
rates and Blast like finishes.
Comply with new lead
standards.


Denso North America Inc.
Denso SeaShield
Marine Systems

A full range of steel, concrete and timber pile rehabilitation systems including petrolatum systems, fiberglass jackets, epoxy grouts and many other product lines.
Call 1-281-821-3355 or Visit densona.com


Blastox/The TDJ Group, Inc.
Blastox - One Step
Lead Abatement

Don't waste $$ on added labor steps with other methods. Don't mix, meter or apply at the job-site. Avoid strict hazardous waste rules.
Let your painters paint!


U.S. Zinc

Combat deterioration and corrosion with our zinc dust in your paints and coatings. U.S. Zinc – Helping the world work™


Barton International
East Coast Shipyard Cut Blasting Costs 30% with BARTON

A comparison trial convinced this shipyard that they could realize significant savings by switching to Barton’s garnet instead of coal or copper slag.
Watch the video now.


Termarust Technologies
Termarust (HR CSA) Chemically Stops
Active Corrosion

Arch truss treated with Termarust's (HR CSA) in 2003. This steel arch bridge is rust free on all surfaces including the crevice corroded joints and connections.

 
 
 
Technology Publishing

The Technology Publishing Network

The Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings (JPCL) PaintSquare
Durability + Design Paint BidTracker JPCL Europe

 
EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About PaintSquare.com   |   Privacy policy   |   Terms & conditions   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us
 

© Copyright 2000-2014, Technology Publishing / PaintSquare, All rights reserved
2100 Wharton Street, Suite 310, Pittsburgh PA 15203-1951; Tel 1-412-431-8300; Fax 1-412-431-5428; E-mail webmaster@paintsquare.com