| Connect Follow us on Twitter Like us on Facebook
About | Subscribe | Advertise


Download our free Blasting Resource Guide eResource Book

Paint and Coatings Industry News

Main News Page

GOP Senators Assail OSHA Policies

Wednesday, December 1, 2010

Comment | More

Secretary of Labor Hilda L. Solis

Republican ranking members of two key U.S. Senate committees have asked Secretary of Labor Hilda L. Solis for an accounting of recent changes proposed by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

In a letter Nov.15, Sens. Olympia J. Snowe (R-ME) and Michael B. Enzi (R-WY) challenge several recent OSHA policy actions and ask Solis to explain the rationale behind them as well as the alternatives considered, and to document the policies’ impact on small business.

Senator Olympia J. Snowe

Snowe is ranking member of the U.S. Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship; Enzi is ranking member of the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions.

‘Undermine Job Creation’

In the five-page letter, the senators told Solis that several OSHA actions “could undermine the job creation ability of our nation’s over 27.5 million small businesses.”

“As our nation recovers from the most devastating set of economic circumstances since World War II, … the federal government should remain focused on fostering an entrepreneurial environment that promotes small business job creation, and not adding yet another layer of uncertainty to bottom-line business operating costs.”

The senators noted OSHA’s effectiveness in dramatically reducing workplace injury and illness rates from 8.4 incidents per 100 full-time workers in 1994, to 3.6 incidents in 2009, and reducing fatal work injuries from 6,632 in 1994 to 4,340 in 2009.

That record of improvement, however, “raises serious questions about why OSHA has recently proposed several significant regulatory changes that will negatively affect small businesses … without the benefit of small business review panels or comprehensive outreach to small businesses.”

The senators question three proposals in particular.

Elimination of Voluntary Protection Programs

OSHA has proposed eliminating funding and staff for the VPP, established in 1982. OSHA Administrator David Michaels said in August that the program should be privately funded, because OSHA’s limited resources should not be expended on companies “that ‘get it’, that are dedicated to workplace safety and doing a great job,” but invested in “companies that don’t get it, that continue to injure and kill workers.”

Four in five VPP participants are businesses with fewer than 500 employees, and 39% have fewer than 100 employees, the senators write. Eliminating public funding “will deter VPP growth among these small businesses and diminish the value of attaining VPP status,” they say.

On-Site Consultation Program Revisions

In September, OSHA proposed major changes to its On-Site Consultation program, seeking greater authority to respond to concerns or incidents involving employers previously recognized as safe and/or those that are working to improve their workplace.

The changes would allow the agency to inspect worksites that are participating in its On-Site Consultation Program—currently, a risk-free opportunity for employers to identify and correct safety problems in their workplace.

Employers that carry Safety and Health Achievement Recognition Program (SHARP) status could also face increased inspections. Historically, businesses that achieve SHARP status have been exempt from OSHA inspections for one year—a benefit that the revision would revoke. (Exceptions currently allow for inspection of SHARP businesses in cases of imminent danger, fatality or catastrophe, or a formal complaint.)

Allowing OSHA to inspect any worksite, regardless of SHARP status, “makes the benefit of the On-Site Consultation program illusory,” the senators say.

The senators say OSHA should have convened a Small Business Regulatory Enforcement and Fairness Act (SBREFA) panel before proposing the On-Site Consultation and VPP revisions and, in the case of the On-Site program, should have addressed concerns by the Small Business Administration Office of Advocacy that the changes would “disincentivize” participation.

Penalty Increases

Finally, the senators challenged OSHA’s recent decision to revamp its penalty structure, increase inspections and ease the traditional penalty mitigation it has given to small firms. Those changes should have been promulgated through a formal notice and public comment rulemaking process, including a SBREFA panel, the senators say.

“Nowhere is there any indication to what extent, if any, the agency considered the economic impact that its new penalty scheme would impose on small businesses,” Snowe and Enzi say.

Taken together, the recent actions “foster the impression that the agency is abandoning a collaborative approach that has been so successful,” the senators say.

‘We Respectfully Request’

The senators urged OSHA to reconsider proceeding with the changes and requested that OSHA provide, by Dec. 10:

• Its commitment that collaboration will be “the primary mechanism” of achieving occupational health and safety enforcement “without unduly inhibiting” job creation;

• “Detailed answers” to the questions raised by the senators;

• A copy of the findings of the unnamed “work group” that reviewed the new penalty policy, a list of the members of the group, and any external communications the group had to evaluate small business impact; and

• Any additional information regarding alternatives considered to mitigate the proposals’ economic impact on business.

OSHA had no immediate response to the letter.


Tagged categories: Government; Health and safety; OSHA

Comment from Richard Croft Jr, (12/2/2010, 10:06 AM)

Kudos to the senators! My work has allowed me to see this situation from multiple sides. One, from a rescue provider in some of the countries largest refineries, and another as a safety professional guarding the safety of employees. My feeling was in the past that OSHA was a cooperative partner in maintaining and improving safety in the workplace. More recent developments made me question that opinion. The questions raised by the senators are certainly valid and echo the questions of many front line safety professionals and business owners.

Comment from Rudi Rennert, (12/2/2010, 10:27 AM)

I think this is one of the only reasons I would support senator Olympia Snowe from Maine. OSHA consulting has been a beneficial program to help smaller businesses that don't have the resources larger companies do to insure that they are operating with safe protocols. It is a valid concern that taking away the incentive for proactive measures will only stiffle growth and burden job creation.

Comment from Jerry LeCompte, (12/3/2010, 10:43 AM)

The accidental loss of life and serious injury on the job is tragic. However, such matters are systematically designated the fault of the owners/management of the company regardless of real evidence of intended neglect. So, I will say again that our government is legislating our country out of business and has been doing so for decades. The result is that jobs are going to other nations that don't have laws effecting businesses at every level of government as we do here in America. The result is the translocation of jobs, especially in the manufacturing and basic industrial businesses. We either must accept the job losses and its effects on our economy or seek ways to deal with legislated costs through our governmental agencies and legislative bodies. Jerry LeCompte

Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.

Nationwide Overspray
Profession Overspray Removal Services

The Finest Name in Safe Overspray Removal. We specialize in removing all contaminants from any surface. Family Owned and Operated for 33 years! Fully insured. Satisfaction is guaranteed.

SSPC: The Society for Protective Coatings

Join SSPC and Enhance
Your Career !

Novatek Corporation
Dustless Coatings Removal

Strip it, clean it, and profile it,
all dust free! High production
rates and Blast like finishes.
Comply with new lead

US Minerals
US Minerals -
Black Magnum

With nationwide production and distribution capabilities, U.S. Minerals supplies a complete range of coal slag and other abrasives to meet all of your blasting needs.

Sidewinder/Persyst Enterprises, Inc.
The Sidewinder Model M2 Solvent Recycler

Combat the rising cost of gunwash, thinners, acetone & more while drastically reducing waste disposal coat.

Blastox/The TDJ Group, Inc.
Blastox - One Step
Lead Abatement

Don't waste money on added labor steps with other methods. Don't mix, meter or apply at the job-site. Avoid strict hazardous waste rules.
Let your painters paint

RPB Respiratory

With RPB Safety’s new Nova 3 Cassette Lens System which has been specifically designed to save you time and money! See the benefits for yourself now!

CS Unitec
Work Cleaner and Safer

CS Unitec’s Vibro-Lo low-vibration scalers offer high performance for greater productivity & improved operator comfort. Optional dust shroud.

PreTox Products - NexTec, Inc.
GOT LEAD? Specify Pretox System products

The ONLY Lead Stabilizer Compatible with All Paint Removal Methods. Works with all Blast Media: Grits | Recyclable Abrasives | CO2 | Water | Power Tools | Etc. Call Dave Steffen at 800.338.8296.

Julbert, Inc.
Built from the ground up.

Dust Collectors Available!
We deliver to your Jobsite!
Built Tough! Priced Right!
PH: 208-437-2100

Technology Publishing

The Technology Publishing Network

The Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings (JPCL) PaintSquare
Durability + Design Paint BidTracker

EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About   |   Privacy policy   |   Terms & conditions   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us

© Copyright 2000-2015, Technology Publishing / PaintSquare, All rights reserved
2100 Wharton Street, Suite 310, Pittsburgh PA 15203-1951; Tel 1-412-431-8300; Fax 1-412-431-5428; E-mail