PaintSquare.com
Follow us on Twitter Follow us on LinkedIn Like us on Facebook Follow us on Instagram Visit the TPC Store
Search the site

 

Advertisement

Montipower, Inc.


Coatings Industry News

Main News Page


A Coatings Specialist Shares Abrasive Advice

Thursday, June 15, 2017

More items for Surface Preparation
More items from North America

Comment | More

Bryon Beck, coatings specialist with the Michigan Department of Transportation, has been with MDOT for more than 40 years, working with coatings for the past 36. During that time, he’s seen plenty of changes in the world of abrasive blasting and surface preparation in general, working primarily with the state’s many bridges, including famous international crossings and the Mackinac Bridge, the fifth-longest suspension bridge in the world.

Bryon Beck
Courtesy of Bryon Beck

Bryon Beck (seen here at right, at the top of one of the towers of the Mackinac Bridge), has 36 years' experience in coatings work with the Michigan Department of Transportation.

Beck spoke with PaintSquare News about his observations regarding abrasive blasting and abrasive choice, and the changes that have come about in the past four decades.

How did you get involved in coatings-related work with MDOT?

I guess I sort of fell into it. I was in construction for about seven years, and I came over here for an interview for a concrete person, or that’s what I thought I came in for. The people who were supposed to interview me weren’t around—so they sent me down and said to interview with [another official]. He was a paint person, not a concrete person. He needed an assistant, so that got me started.

What structures are you generally working with?

Predominantly structural steel bridges; [in the] last four to five years, coating concrete structures.

If you were speaking with a contractor who's new to the industry, what would be the first thing you'd tell them to take into consideration when choosing an abrasive media for a given job?

Use the appropriate abrasive type and gradation to meet specifications—larger isn’t necessarily better. Using an abrasive gradation that produces a surface profile in excess of specifications, [requires] the usage of more coating.

For the most part, our contractors want the most aggressive one they can get. They forget that we have criteria for minimum and maximum profile. A lot of times, that is exceeded, at least on the jobs that I know of. That does worry me: that on a certain percentage of the jobs that I go out to, there’s high profile.

Mackinac Bridge
© iStock.com / gnagel

Michigan's many bridges include the Mackinac, the world's fifth-largest suspension bridge.

Some of that could be because it’s already existing. For instance, back when we used red lead, I think the profile was as high as 3.9 (mils), and we now max out at 2.8. So it could be an existing condition, or maybe when we painted with a different system in recent years, the previous contractor [prepared it to] an excessive profile.

I was on a job this spring where [the contractor was] using steel grit, and it was a size that was for a 3 to 5 mil profile. You’d have to pressure down a lot to get the profile we’re looking for [with that abrasive size]. But they’re looking for more aggressive abrasives. And sometimes you need that when you have mill scale, but on a bridge that was painted previously, you don’t need that—the mill scale’s not there. Or hopefully it’s not there.

You mentioned using too large an abrasive will require the use of more coating—it seems like such a small thing, but does that really add up?

Well, yeah: If you increase the size of—if you want to call the peaks and valleys “mountains”—you’re creating more surface area. And quite honestly, paint is probably one of the cheaper things that’s out on the job, so to [a contractor], it probably doesn’t seem like much of an issue. But the problem is, some of the paint manufacturers have maximums that they want, that you should not exceed.

What’s changed the most in the world of abrasives and surface preparation since you’ve been in the industry?

Containment and its evolution. The first containments we ever put up were basically to stop paint from going onto traffic; we’d put it on the downwind side in front of traffic, then we’d put it on the other side, and that was about all the intent was.

Blue Water Bridge
Chris Light, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

The Blue Water Bridge, built in 1938, stretches from Port Huron, Michigan, to Sarnia, Ontario.

Then, of course, we realized there was a lead issue. We started working on our Blue Water Bridge, which is an international bridge from Port Huron, Michigan, to Sarnia, Canada. Our crews had always done the maintenance on our side of the bridge, and they’d just go in with a single pot and do spot repairs. That didn’t generate much noise.

Then the first contract goes out, a contractor comes in with full guns, and of course they have a much larger compressor and generator. People complained about the noise, and that was the big issue—when in reality they should have been concerned about the bridge coating being red lead, and the materials being dropped right down onto the ground near the structure.

So then somebody said, “Well, what about the lead?” And we started investigating—this was the mid-‘80s, maybe—then we started developing containment, negative pressure, that type of thing.

At one point, we had different specifications, if it was urban, rural—now it’s all the same. Nothing is supposed to be escaping the containment.

What do you think the next trend is with regard to abrasives and blasting?

I have no idea. There are different innovations out there: We’ve looked at robotics, but that’s not practical because of the different designs we have of bridges—for the regular, smaller spans, you probably could come up with a robotic system that could work for a lot of those, but all of our bridges are different to some degree. We’re also looking into lasers, but I don’t like that so much, because it doesn’t leave enough of a profile. There are a number of things we’ve experimented with in the past, but it just never materializes because of difficulty, or expense, or whatever.

   

Tagged categories: Abrasive blasting; Abrasive size; Abrasives; Bridges; Containment; Structural steel; Surface preparation

Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.

Advertisements
 
Graco Inc.
 
Graco EcoQuip 2: Experience the Difference
 
While others claim their equipment is the same, none of them compare to Graco’s EcoQuip 2™ Vapor Abrasive® blasting line. Visit graco.com/ecoquip to learn more.
 

 
NLB Corporation
 
NLB Sure Shroud: Greater Protection and Flexibility
 
NLB’s Sure Shroud’s lighter weight and flexibility reduces operator fatigue and offers unmatched protection against high pressure hose ruptures. 10k to 40k psi rated.
 

 
SABRE Autonomous Solutions
 
Introducing the ALPHA1 Blasting Robot
 
Once installed and commissioned – simply
SCAN PLAN BLAST.
 

 
Industrial Vacuum Equipment Corp.
 
Hurricane Vacuums
& Dust Collectors
 
Vacuum and dust collector hose, filters and related accessories.
IndustrialVacuum.com
 

 
CHLOR*RID International Inc.
 
SOLUTIONS THAT WORK
 
Companies that invest in corrosion control use CHLOR RID products
  • Soluble salt removal liquid
  • Test kits to verify contamination levels
  • Surface passivation to hold the blast
INFO@CHLOR-RID.COM 800.422.3217
 

 
Vector Technologies Ltd.
 
The Original Performance Proven Vacuum Solutions
 
VecLoader® 616 Double Dump, Continuous Vacuum, 170 HP w/ 2,400 CFM & 28” Hg. 33% More Efficient than traditional vacuum systems! Choose Vector for the most powerful and the most reliable trailer mounted vacuums in the industry! Email us at: inquiry@vector-vacuums.com or call us at: 800-832-4010
 

 
SAFE Systems, Inc.
 
SAFE Systems'
Blast Lights &
Deadman Switches
 
Halogen or LED blast lights available with our NEW urethane bumper. Switches available in many colors for color coding your hoses.
 

 
HoldTight Solutions Inc.
 
NO FLASH RUST - NO CONTAMINANTS
 
Our HoldTight®102 salt remover & flash rust
preventer prevents flash
rust by removing surface contaminants. Contact us
for your nearest distributor.
(800) 319.8802 sales@holdtight.com
 

 
KTA-Tator, Inc. - Corporate Office
 
KTA-TATOR LABORATORY SERVICES
 
• Coating failure analysis
• Independent testing
• Accelerated weathering testing
• Abrasives Testing
• Oil & Gas Material Qualification
• A2LA Certificate #2455.01
Contact: Rob Leggat
at 412-788-1300 x176
 

 
Carboline Company
 
Carboline launches new website!
 
The completely revamped website, offers quick and easy access to essential product information and is now mobile-friendly.
 

 
 
 

Technology Publishing Co., 1501 Reedsdale Street, Suite 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 15233

TEL 1-412-431-8300  • FAX  1-412-431-5428  •  EMAIL webmaster@paintsquare.com


The Technology Publishing Network

Durability + Design PaintSquare the Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings Paint BidTracker

 
EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About PaintSquare.com   |   Privacy policy   |   Terms & conditions   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us