Follow us on Twitter Follow us on LinkedIn Like us on Facebook Follow us on Instagram Visit the TPC Store
Search the site




Coatings Industry News

Main News Page

AkzoNobel Rejects Third PPG Proposal

Tuesday, May 9, 2017

Comment | More

After two weeks of deliberation and one meeting with PPG Industries, Amsterdam-based AkzoNobel announced Monday morning (May 8) that it has rejected the Pittsburgh-based coatings giant’s third proposal for a merger between the two, leaving the future of PPG’s plan uncertain.

PPG Place
© / JoeCollver

PPG made its third offer, worth about $28.8 billion, on April 24; AkzoNobel announced Monday that it had rejected the proposal.

PPG, however, says the Dutch company refused to negotiate, and that the meeting in question was called hastily and did not involve any discussion about AkzoNobel’s concerns regarding the merger plan, or about AkzoNobel’s alternative strategy for growth.

Denied Three Times

AkzoNobel said in its announcement that it had engaged in an “extensive review and careful consideration” of PPG’s third bid, which was made public April 25, and that CEO Ton Büchner and Supervisory Board Chair Antony Burgmans met with PPG Chairman and CEO Michael McGarry and Lead Independent Director Hugh Grant.

Ton Buchner, Antony Burgmans

AkzoNobel says that CEO Ton Büchner (pictured, left) and Supervisory Board Chair Antony Burgmans (right) met with PPG Chairman and CEO Michael McGarry and Lead Independent Director Hugh Grant.

But in the end, the company says, it determined that its stakeholders would be better suited by its plan to accelerate growth by spinning off its Specialty Chemicals business as a separate entity from its Paints and Coatings business.

“The extensive review and the meeting with PPG confirmed to AkzoNobel that its own strategy is better and does not contain the risks and uncertainties inherent in PPG’s proposal,” AkzoNobel said in a press release.

PPG: AkzoNobel ‘Lacks Proper Governance’

PPG responded with a statement saying the company is “disappointed that AkzoNobel has once again refused to enter into a negotiation regarding a combination of the two companies, ignoring the best interests of its stakeholders, including long-term shareholders who overwhelmingly support engagement."

While AkzoNobel pointed to its meeting with PPG executives as part of its “considerable in-depth analysis” of the proposal, PPG offered a different view of the conference. In its statement, PPG said it had gotten no feedback on the April 24 proposal until it contacted AkzoNobel May 4. According to PPG, AkzoNobel replied May 5 and told PPG it would meet only in Rotterdam, in less than 24 hours.

Michael McGarry

PPG says the invitation for McGarry (pictured) to meet with the AkzoNobel chairs came with less than 24 hours' notice, and the meeting lasted only 90 minutes.

PPG says the meeting lasted 90 minutes and that the AkzoNobel executives “stated up front that they did not have the intent nor the authority to negotiate.” The AkzoNobel chairs did not share their concerns about the PPG proposal, and wouldn’t entertain questions about their own planned split, PPG says.

“The failure of the AkzoNobel Boards to engage with PPG to fully evaluate and discuss PPG’s proposal reflects a continued lack of proper governance, and is another attempt to avoid a true comparison on stakeholder impacts of PPG’s proposal versus AkzoNobel’s standalone plan,” PPG said.

AkzoNobel: Concerns Unaddressed

In rejecting the latest proposal, AkzoNobel cited many of the same issues it noted previously with regard to PPG’s merger bid. The offer, AkzoNobel said, undervalues the company, includes regulatory risks, would take up to 18 months to complete, contains uncertainty because of its scale, and does not fully address AkzoNobel’s concerns about its employees and its commitment to sustainability.

PPG is currently the largest coatings company in the world, with AkzoNobel second, by sales. A merger with AkzoNobel would be the largest acquisition PPG has ever taken on, the Dutch company noted.

Merger Future Uncertain

The discussion of PPG’s multiple offers has played out publicly, and at times contentiously, over the past two months.

PPG had called its third offer “one last invitation” to AkzoNobel to consider the merger proposal. The new proposal came in at 96.75 euros per outstanding ordinary share of AkzoNobel, bringing the total offer to about $28.8 billion. PPG’s first and second offers, of $22.8 billion and $26.3 billion, were both rejected out of hand by AkzoNobel.

In April, AkzoNobel shareholders, led by hedge fund Elliott Advisers, attempted to engineer the dismissal of board chair Burgmans. AkzoNobel responded by reiterating its confidence in Burgmans, and questioning the relationship of Elliott and PPG.

The future of the merger proposal is uncertain now that AkzoNobel has rejected what was presented as a final offer from PPG. In its statement on Monday, PPG said it “will review the full details of AkzoNobel’s response issued today.”


Tagged categories: Acquisitions; AkzoNobel; Business matters; Coatings manufacturers; Mergers; PPG

Comment from Raymond Merrill, (5/9/2017, 12:43 PM)

Let's see. World's largest paint manufacturer merging with world's second largest paint manufacturer. Anti-trust, anyone???

Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.

Industrial Vacuum Equipment Corp.
Hurricane Vacuums
& Dust Collectors
Vacuum and dust collector hose, filters and related accessories.

SAFE Systems, Inc.
Custom blast rooms
by SAFE Systems
Don't waste time and money "making do" with a "standard" design. Let us work with you to design and build the system that best fits your requirements.
Call 1-800-634-7278

Tarps manufacturing, Inc.
QUALITY MADE IN AMERICA —Available near you!
CLICK to get a behind-the-scenes look at how Tarps Manufacturing makes the highest-quality tarps right here in the USA — available nationwide.

SABRE Autonomous Solutions
The ALPHA1 provides reliable results consistently allowing you to cost your next job with confidence.

HoldTight Solutions Inc.
Our HoldTight®102 salt remover & flash rust
preventer prevents flash
rust by removing surface contaminants. Contact us
for your nearest distributor.
(800) 319.8802

ARC / A.W. Chesterton Company
Superior Impact & Wear Resistant Lining
100% solids, impact resistant, ceramic reinforced, epoxy/urethane hybrid lining for severe abrasive wear and impact resistance.

Sauereisen, Inc.
SewerGard® 210XHB
• 300 mils in a single coat by plural component equipment
• Fast Setting
• 100% Solids Epoxy
• Chemical-resistant barrier for municipal wastewater environments

Upgrade with the Bullard GenVX
Click here for your blast helmet.

KTA-Tator, Inc. - Corporate Office
• Coating failure analysis
• Independent testing
• Accelerated weathering testing
• Abrasives Testing
• Oil & Gas Material Qualification
• A2LA Certificate #2455.01
Contact: Rob Leggat
at 412-788-1300 x176

CHLOR*RID International Inc.
Companies that invest in corrosion control use CHLOR RID products
  • Soluble salt removal liquid
  • Test kits to verify contamination levels
  • Surface passivation to hold the blast
INFO@CHLOR-RID.COM 800.422.3217


Technology Publishing Co., 1501 Reedsdale Street, Suite 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 15233

TEL 1-412-431-8300  • FAX  1-412-431-5428  •  EMAIL

The Technology Publishing Network

Durability + Design PaintSquare the Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings Paint BidTracker

EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About   |   Privacy policy   |   Terms & conditions   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us