PaintSquare.com
      | Connect Follow us on Twitter Like us on Facebook
About | Subscribe | Advertise
  

 

Download our free ebook on Ultra-High-Pressure Waterjetting

Paint and Coatings Industry News

Main News Page


MIT Proposes Floating Nuclear Plants

Monday, April 21, 2014

More items for Program/Project Management

More items from Asia Pacific

Comment | More

Offshore nuclear plants, anchored in deep water, could be the answer to preventing catastrophic tsunami and earthquake damage like that inflicted on the Japan's Fukushima Daiichi complex in 2011, according to research underway at MIT.

A team led by the university's Dr. Jacopo Buongiorno is developing a design for a nuclear reactor that he says has the potential "of revolutionizing the nuclear industry, both in terms of economics and safety."

The facility could be built entirely in a shipyard, then towed several miles offshore and linked to the electric grid with a transmission line, Buongiorno says in a video presentation of his research.

Christopher Sherrill, courtesy of the MIT Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering

Offshore plants could "revolutionize" the nuclear industry, researchers say.  Like offshore oil drilling platforms, the structure would include living quarters and a helipad for transportation to the site.

Although the concept of a floating nuclear plant is not new— Russia is now building one on a barge moored at the shore—none have been located far enough offshore to be able to ride out a tsunami, says Buongiorno, an associate professor of nuclear science and engineering.

He and his team presented the concept last week at the Small Modular Reactors Symposium, hosted by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

Safety Offshore

For this new design, Buongiorno says, “the biggest selling point is the enhanced safety.”

With the facility far offshore, moored in about 100 meters of water, "the biggest issue that faces most nuclear plants under emergency conditions—overheating and potential meltdown, as happened at Fukushima, Chernobyl, and Three Mile Island—would be virtually impossible at sea," MIT said in a research announcement.

Such a complex would be immune to the effects of tsunamis and earthquakes, Buongiorno contends. Like offshore oil drilling platforms, the facility would include living quarters and a helipad for transportation to the site.

MIT Floating Nuke Plant
Illustration courtesy of Jake Jurewicz/MIT-NSE

A cutaway view of the proposed plant shows that the reactor vessel itself is located deep underwater, with its containment vessel surrounded by a compartment flooded with seawater, allowing for passive cooling even in the event of an accident.

“It’s very close to the ocean, which is essentially an infinite heat sink, so it’s possible to do cooling passively, with no intervention," he says. "The reactor containment itself is essentially underwater.”

Other Advantages

Buongiorno sees other advantages in his plan.

For one thing, he says, it is increasingly difficult and expensive to find suitable sites for new nuclear plants. They usually need to be next to an ocean, lake, or river to provide cooling water, but shorefront real estate consumes much of the available land.

Plants offshore, but out of sight from land, could be located close to the markets they serve.

“The ocean is inexpensive real estate,” Buongiorno says.

Second, if an accident occurs at an offshore facility, he said, it should not require widespread evacuations, as is currently the case.

In addition, decommissioning the plant at the end of its life could be accomplished by simply towing it away to a central facility, as is done now for the Navy’s carrier and submarine reactors. The ocean site would remain pristine, according to MIT.

Construction and Security

Meanwhile, shipyard construction allows for better standardization of facilities, and the steel design eliminates the use of concrete, which Buongiorno says is often responsible for construction delays and cost overruns.

Dr. Jacopo Buongiorno
Screen grab / Christopher Sherrill, MIT Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering

Offshore nuclear plants have several advantages, including cost and construction standards, says Dr. Jacopo Buongiorno, but “the biggest selling point is the enhanced safety.”

The design is flexible, allowing for plants of any size, up to today's largest facilities. Once in operation, the plant would operate like an on-shore facility and under the same regulatory security requirements.

“Project work has confirmed the feasibility of achieving this goal, including satisfaction of the extra concern of protection against underwater attack,” says Professor Neil Todreas, MIT's KEPCO Professor of Nuclear Science and Engineering and Mechanical Engineering, a member of the research team

'Very Feasible'

Buongiorno sees a market for such plants in Asia, which has both high tsunami risks and a rapidly growing need for new power sources. “It would make a lot of sense for Japan,” as well as Indonesia, Chile, and Africa, he says.

MIT professor Michael Golay and others from MIT and the University of Wisconsin are also involved in the project. Another key partner is Chicago Bridge and Iron, of Canton, MA, a major nuclear plant and offshore platform construction company.

One Japanese nuclear scientist who is not involved in the project calls it "very attractive and promising."

“I think this is technically very feasible," says Toru Obara, a professor at the Research Laboratory for Nuclear Reactors at the Tokyo Institute of Technology. "...Of course, further study is needed to realize the concept, but the authors have the answers to each question —and the answers are realistic.”

   

Tagged categories: Construction; Industrial design; Nuclear Power Plants; Offshore; Research; Shipyards

Comment from Richard Hogue, (4/21/2014, 9:46 AM)

Two issues that are not addressed are hurricanes and corrosion.


Comment from Stephen Pinney, (4/21/2014, 1:26 PM)

There was considerable work done on floating Nuclear Plants on Blount Island on in Jacksonville in I believe it was late 1972s. Best of my recolection, it was sponsored by Public Service New Jersey to be floated inti place.


Comment from Mary Chollet, (4/21/2014, 1:39 PM)

We reached out to Dr. Buongiorno on the question of hurricanes and corrosion. His reply: STORMS: in general it is desirable to site the plant in an area where massive storms are not frequent. Having said that, the plant is designed to withstand a storm with a 100-year return frequency (as defined by historical data for the site of interest) without any significant damage to safety-critical systems and components. For even less frequent storms (e.g. >1000-year return frequency) the plant can be towed out of the storm’s way, which can be done with a few days warning typical of today’s meteo technology. CORROSION: the platform is built with the same materials and corrosion-mitigation approaches used in oil/gas floating rigs, e.g. cathodic protection. Major maintenance (say every 15-20 years) could be done in a centralized shipyard, that would serve a fleet of such floating plants.


Comment from tim hady, (4/22/2014, 12:00 AM)

sounds great until I think about leaks, or war or terrorism. How do ya make it secure? Prevent accidents? Prevent sabotage and damage from enemies or terrorists?


Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.

Armakleen Company, The
ARMEX when nondestructive cleaning is critical

The gentle physical propriety of baking soda but yet aggressive cleaning ability is what makes ARMEX the only choice for nondestructive abrasive blasting.


Chicago Corrosion Group
Vendor-neutral corrosion consulting

What you don’t know about painting is costing you a fortune. Call today to see how CCG’s vendor-neutral, owner’s advocacy saves our clients millions.


SAFE Systems, Inc.
SAFE Systems'
Blast Lights &
Deadman Switches

Halogen or LED blast lights available with our NEW urethane bumper. Switches available in many colors for color coding your hoses.


HoldTight Solutions Inc.
NO FLASH RUST -
NO CONTAMINANTS

Our HoldTight®102 salt remover & flash rush inhibitor prevents flash rust by removing surface contaminants.
Contact us for your nearest distributor. (800) 319.8802 sales@holdtight.com


Clemco Industries Corp.
Global engineering-trusted solutions

For more than 70 years, Clemco has provided the highest quality blast equipment with a total commitment to comfort and safety.


Armorthane
Corrosion Coatings for Protection and Repair

Buy POLYURETHANE or POLYUREA coatings and spray surfaces for years of proven chemical resistance, water- and weather-proofing, and structural improvements.


CS Unitec
Surface Prep & Material Removal

CS Unitec’s Floor Planers remove coatings & corrosion from concrete & metal surfaces. Produce keyed profiles for waterproofing applications. info@csunitec.com


KTA-Tator, Inc. - Corporate Office
KTA-TATOR LABORATORY SERVICES

• Coating failure analysis
• Independent
  comparative testing
• Accelerated
  weathering testing
• Toxic metals testing
• A2LA Accredited
800-245-6379


Novetas Solutions
Number 1 Crushed Glass Abrasive in America!

Manufactured from 100% Recycled Glass.
NO Crystalline Silica,
Beryllium & Arsenic
Great White Metal Finish!
4 plants on Navy QPL
Call us at 866-775-6226

 
 
 
Technology Publishing

The Technology Publishing Network

The Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings (JPCL) PaintSquare
Durability + Design Paint BidTracker

 
EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About PaintSquare.com   |   Privacy policy   |   Terms & conditions   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us
 

© Copyright 2000-2015, Technology Publishing / PaintSquare, All rights reserved
2100 Wharton Street, Suite 310, Pittsburgh PA 15203-1951; Tel 1-412-431-8300; Fax 1-412-431-5428; E-mail webmaster@paintsquare.com