PaintSquare.com


The First Word in Protective & Marine Coatings

A Product of Technology Publishing / PaintSquare
JPCL | PaintSquare News | Durability + Design | Paint BidTracker

Chemical & Petrochemical Plant Coating Systems

Paint and Coatings Industry News

Main News Page


High Court: No Pay for Donning PPE

Thursday, January 30, 2014

More items for Health & Safety

Comment | More

Donning and doffing personal protective equipment and getting to and from the worksite are a normal part of a worker's day and do not merit extra pay, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously declared this week.

In a ruling released Monday (Jan. 27), the high court sided with U.S. Steel in a collection case by workers seeking back pay for time spent "donning and doffing" PPE that the company requires at its steel plants.

OSHA PPE
Photos: OSHA

At issue was whether the gear in question could be considered "clothes." Most of it could, the court said.

In Sandifer et al v. United States Steel Corp., Clifton Sandifer and co-workers at the company's Gary Works subsidiary in Indiana claimed that they spent up to two hours getting ready for work—time that the workers said should be compensated under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.

Gear v. Clothes

The workers contended that putting on protective gear is not the same as "changing clothes" and should be a separately compensated activity.

The workers pinned their case on a 1949 amendment to the FLSA that allowed that some instances of changing clothes and washing before and after work (at mine portals, for example) consumed enough unpaid time that the issue could be part of a collective bargaining agreement.

In the U.S. Steel case, however, the justices affirmed all of the lower-court rulings that viewed donning PPE and clean-up as an integral and brief part of the workers' day.

"[It] is evident that the donning and doffing in this case qualifies as 'changing clothes' under §203(o)," said the ruling, written by Justice Antonin Scalia.

Toupees and Scuba Gear

In the first place, Scalia said, "[o]f the 12 [PPE] items at issue, only 3—safety glasses, earplugs, and a respirator—do not fit within the elaborated interpretation of 'clothes.'"

OSHA PPE

Safety glasses and respirators are not clothing, but they require little time to put on, Justice Scalia wrote.

(The other items were a flame-retardant jacket, pair of pants, a hood, a hardhat, a snood, wristlets, work globes, leggings and metatarsal boots.)

Second, rather than splitting hairs over whether, say, earplugs are clothes and the time spent to insert earplugs should be considered separately from putting on other items, Scalia said, "A more appropriate way to proceed is for courts to ask whether the period at issue can, on the whole, be fairly characterized as 'time spent in changing clothes or washing.'"

The case was argued before the court on Nov. 4 in a spirited session that included discussion of whether clothing included earrings, necklaces, parkas, scabbards, scuba gear, a suit of armour and even toupees.

("I resent that," Scalia jibed after the toupee reference.)

Reactions

U.S. Steel greeted the decision happily. “We are pleased that the Supreme Court has unanimously ruled in our favor that the brief amount of time it takes to put on and remove protective clothing is not part of the paid workday under the Fair Labor Standards Act,” the company said in a statement.

OSHA PPE

Many industries filed briefs in support of U.S. Steel. The plaintiffs' lawyer predicted that some would face the same issue.

“For many decades, U.S. Steel has appropriately and constructively addressed these matters in our collective bargaining process and this decision reaffirms the validity of that approach.”

Eric Schnapper, the plaintiffs' lawyer, predicted that the same debate would now shift to other industries.

"The fighting will go on," he told Reuters.

   

Tagged categories: Health and safety; Laws and litigation; Personal protective equipment; Respirators; Steel; Workers

Comment from Tony Rangus, (1/30/2014, 9:13 AM)

It is a given that unions have made a difference in the health, safety and treatment of workers. But to sue to get additional monies for donning PPE. Got to hand to the United Steel Workers.


Comment from M. Halliwell, (1/30/2014, 10:55 AM)

My experience has been that, except for mobing/demobing for out-of-town work, travel is not typically something you can claim. As for the PPE: what is taking the workers 2 hours to get into?


Comment from peter gibson, (1/30/2014, 11:11 AM)

Typical unions .... 2 hours for what.


Comment from Andrew Piedl, (1/30/2014, 11:35 AM)

I wonder if Scalia is 'on the clock' while donning his holy robes


Comment from Chuck Pease, (1/30/2014, 8:43 PM)

Supreme Court Justices average $ 217,000 in salary. Dont think he cares how long it takes to don his apparell.


Comment from Keith Holdsworth, (2/5/2014, 11:26 AM)

Once you show up for work in your civilian clothes and clock in to work any time or costs associated with getting ready to perform a job safely should be paid for by the employer.....it doesn't matter if they are Union or Non-union. It has already been determined the employer is responsible for the costs of PPE in the work place, why would the time to put it on or take it off not be paid for. Provided the time spent is reasonable and not being wasted frivolously.


Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.

Bullard

The Next Generation
of Blasting

• Lightest
• Coolest
• Most Comfortable
• Most Dependable


Clemco Industries Corp.
Powerful Protection in a Small Package

Mounts inside blast helmet, alerts operator to dangerous breathing-air condition by audible, visual, and vibratory alarms. Easily calibrated, battery operated.


PaintSquare
SSPC 2014 Product Demos

Watch product demos by SSPC 2014 exhibitors. Check them out now!


ABKaelin, LLC
Quality is our bottom line

Services include:
• Environmental, Health &
  Safety
• Contractor QP Certification
• Quality Assurance Programs
  and Auditing
• SSPC C3/C5 and other
  Training
• Coatings
• Design/Construction
See our website at abkaelin.com or contact us today abkaelin@comcast.com


Novatek Corporation
Dustless Coatings Removal

Strip it, clean it, and profile it,
all dust free! High production
rates and Blast like finishes.
Comply with new lead
standards.


CS Unitec
Peening Preparation Tools

CS Unitec’s hand-held scarifiers are an ideal alternative to small-area shot blasting for cleaning and preparing concrete & metal surfaces. info@csunitec.com


Blastox/The TDJ Group, Inc.
Blastox - One Step
Lead Abatement

Don't waste $$ on added labor steps with other methods. Don't mix, meter or apply at the job-site. Avoid strict hazardous waste rules.
Let your painters paint!

 
 
 
Technology Publishing

The Technology Publishing Network

The Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings (JPCL) PaintSquare
Durability + Design Paint BidTracker JPCL Europe

 
EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About PaintSquare.com   |   Privacy policy   |   Terms & conditions   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us
 

© Copyright 2000-2014, Technology Publishing / PaintSquare, All rights reserved
2100 Wharton Street, Suite 310, Pittsburgh PA 15203-1951; Tel 1-412-431-8300; Fax 1-412-431-5428; E-mail webmaster@paintsquare.com