PaintSquare.com
      | Connect Follow us on Twitter Like us on Facebook
About | Subscribe | Advertise
  

 

Download our free e-book! Protecting and maintaining transmission pipeline

Paint and Coatings Industry News

Main News Page


Low Bidders Sue MnDOT over Award

Thursday, October 17, 2013

More items for Program/Project Management

Comment | More

The losing bidders for a $100 million interstate highway construction project in Minnesota have asked the state's Court of Appeals to review the bidding process for the award, which went to the highest bidder.

Minnesota's Department of Transportation (MnDOT) awarded the Interstate 35E MnPASS design/build project to Ames Construction Inc. in the spring, although its bid was $11 million more than that of low bidder McCrossan Construction.

MnDOT's Technical Review Committee selected the Ames proposal for the Twin Cities project on the basis of "Apparent Best Value."

Ames Construction project
Ames Construction Inc.

The contract was awarded on an "Apparent Best Value" basis to Ames Construction Inc., whose projects include Colorado's U.S. 36 Express Lanes Project.

The award drew a formal protest Aug. 19 from McCrossan Construction and the other bidder, Lunda/Shafer Joint Venture. The losing bidders alleged that MnDOT "did not follow the requirements in the Instructions to Proposers" (ITP) and that the Technical Review Committee "did not apply the explicit criteria set forth in the Instruction to Proposers when scoring the proposals."

Irregularities Cited

The bidders alleged, for example, that:

  • Bidders were limited to 120 days during which they could restrict the shoulders on two stretches of I-35, yet Ames' proposal restricted the shoulder on one of those strectches for more than 300 days;
  • Bidders were required to obtain approval for any design changes through the Alternative Technical Concept (ATC) process and could include an ATC in their bid only if MnDOT had approved it in advance. Ames' proposal "did not comply withthe instructions," the bidder said; and
  • Evaluators did not adhere to the Technical Proposal Evaluation Manual in scoring the proposals, "not holding Ames to the criteria set forth in the bid documents" and thus giving that company "a substantial advangage not enjoyed by other bidders."

Protest Recommendation

MnDOT's Protest Official, Kent Allin, conceded in his Protest Recommendation that Minnesota's Instructions to Proposers and Technical Proposal Evaluation Manual contained "inconsistent language," but Allin said that "technical error" did not result "in any material inequality."

McCrossan Construction
C.S. McCrossan Construction

Plaintiff and losing bidder C.S. McCrossan Construction says it submitted the lowest bid and achieved the highest technical score in the state's evaluation. The company's projects include Highway 14 in Waseca, MN.

Allin also noted that MnDOT had declined to comment to his office on its scoring protocol, a response that "was simply not helpful." But again, he said, the non-response "does not equate to anything that would make the selection process arbitrary or capricious."

He also noted that MnDOT acknowledged two deviations from the RFP requirements and said he found the "conflict and varying language" in the procurement documents "troubling."

But he added that it was "impossible to expect there could ever be a procurement process of this size and complexity that does not involve a single deviation from an RFP requirement outside the ATC process."

In the end, Allin concluded that the selection of Ames followed more than 1,200 hours of evaluation and "was conducted in a manner that was reasoned and fair."

On Sept. 17, Minnesota Commission of Transportation Charles A. Zelle accepted Allin's recommendations and reaffirmed the award to Ames.

Appeals Petition

The plaintiffs allege in their Statement of the Case, filed Monday (Oct. 14), that MnDOT "acted arbitrarily or capriciously or otherwise contrary to law in awarding the contract to Ames."

Lexington Bridge
Wikimedia Commons / Todd Murray

The Lexington Bridge, completed in 2004, carries I-35 East over the Mississippi River into St. Paul, MN.

The suit seeks an “immediate injunction to halt further work while the courts determine if the department acted properly in awarding the bid to a company with a lower technical score and [higher] price tag" than McCrossan's.

McCrossan said in a news release that MnDOT "improperly applied federal rules when it comes to the hiring of disadvantaged business enterprises (DBE)" and that McCrossan's bid was "the only proposal that fit within the state's budget for the project, as well as the bid with the highest technical score."

   

Tagged categories: Bidding; Bridges; Construction; Contracts; DOT; Government contracts; Lawsuits; Roads/Highways

Comment from peter gibson, (10/17/2013, 11:33 AM)

I love this story. In Europe bidding is on the best bid principle. In the US contractors are scrambling to offer the lowest bid. With the consequences thereof. Now the whining begins.


Comment from John Fauth, (10/18/2013, 9:03 AM)

"Best" is a relative term.


Comment from WAN MOHAMAD NOR WAN ABDUL RAHMAN, (10/18/2013, 9:34 AM)

I believed that the tender board have evaluated the bidding according to procedures. Nowadays we cannot please everybody.


Comment from M. Halliwell, (10/18/2013, 12:14 PM)

I must admit there is something to the Dutch system....knock off the high and low bids and go for the one closest to the middle for what's left. Knocks off the most likely outliers and (hopefully) puts you middle of the road in balancing inexpensive with safe.


Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.

Minerals Research & Recovery

HIGH PERFORMANCE ABRASIVES


“Made in the USA!”

Why recycle waste from other countries? Go FASTER, CLEANER, at 1/3 THE COST with MR&R “All-American” Sharpshot®HP!!

WATCH THE VIDEO


Chicago Corrosion Group
Vendor-neutral corrosion consulting

What you don’t know about painting is costing you a fortune. Call today to see how CCG’s vendor-neutral, owner’s advocacy saves our clients millions.


PPG Protective and Marine Coatings Group
Industrial strength performance in ONE can.

Now get the durability and protection of two components in one can: Amercoat® ONE, PSX® ONE and Sigmadur ONE.


Nationwide Overspray
Profession Overspray Removal Services

The Finest Name in Safe Overspray Removal. We specialize in removing all contaminants from any surface. Family Owned and Operated for 33 years! Fully insured. Satisfaction is guaranteed.


Absolute Equipment/Grand Rental Station
Portable Power from Absolute Equipment

•Compressors
•Lighting Systems
•Generators
•Light Compaction
Sales • Rental • Service
Call 1-866-931-6655
Over a century of
providing excellence.


Ethox Chemicals LLC
Ethoflex® ER instantly upgrades your epoxy!

The only epoxy additive that improves flexibility, corrosion resistance, toughness, and adhesion, without hurting pot life, cure time, or increasing VOCs.


HoldTight Solutions Inc.
NO FLASH RUST -
NO CONTAMINANTS

Our HoldTight®102 salt remover & flash rust preventer prevents flash
rust by removing surface contaminants. It has no equal; only wannabees.
Contact us for your
nearest distributor.
(800) 319.8802 sales@holdtight.com


Safway Services
Suspended Access Made Easy With QuikDeck™

The smart choice for suspended access, QuikDeck’s interchangeable, lightweight components make them easy to set up and reassemble when you need to move.


Julbert, Inc.
Built from the ground up.

Dust Collectors Available!
We deliver to your Jobsite!
Built Tough! Priced Right!
PH: 208-437-2100 customerservice@julbertinc.com


Armorthane
Polyurethane and Polyurea Sprayed-On Protection

Buy POLYURETHANE or POLYUREA coatings and spray equipment for years of proven chemical resistance, water- and weather-proofing, and structural improvements.

 
 
 
Technology Publishing

The Technology Publishing Network

The Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings (JPCL) PaintSquare
Durability + Design Paint BidTracker

 
EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About PaintSquare.com   |   Privacy policy   |   Terms & conditions   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us
 

© Copyright 2000-2015, Technology Publishing / PaintSquare, All rights reserved
2100 Wharton Street, Suite 310, Pittsburgh PA 15203-1951; Tel 1-412-431-8300; Fax 1-412-431-5428; E-mail webmaster@paintsquare.com