PaintSquare.com


The First Word in Protective & Marine Coatings

A Product of Technology Publishing / PaintSquare
JPCL | PaintSquare News | Durability + Design | Paint BidTracker

Equipment Suppliers: Get listed in the 2014 JPCL Equipment Buying Guide for FREE!

Paint and Coatings Industry News

Main News Page


Employers Unite Against Silica Rule

Wednesday, September 4, 2013

Comment | More

Construction employers have rushed to mobilize against a new federal proposal to limit worker exposure to crystalline silica, ensuring a showdown with unions over the controversial measure.

Just days after the Occupational Safety and Health Administration released its long-delayed Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Occupational Exposure to Respirable Crystalline Silica, a new coalition of construction groups representing employers emerged to fight the rule. Labor and other supporters of the rule are being equally vocal.

The 11 building and contracting associations that have formed the Construction Industry Safety Coalition say their goal is "to encourage OSHA to develop better choices for compliance with the construction-specific silica rule: alternatives that also address costs, consistency with existing federal regulations, and do not overly burden small businesses."

The group, notably, does not include the asphalt industry, which says it is prepared to meet the requirements of the proposal, which has been submitted for publication in the Federal Register.

Silica
NJ Department of Health via OSHA

More than 640,000 American workers are exposed to excessive levels of respirable crystalline silica, according to OSHA. The current permissible limits are 40 years old.

Meanwhile, labor unions are calling for swift action to finalize what they call a "long overdue" rule.

New Rules

The proposed rules—one for general industry and maritime employment, and one for construction—would update 40-year-old Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs) on silica. The proposal also details methods for controlling worker exposure, conducting medical surveillance, training workers about silica-related hazards, and recordkeeping.

The rule will be felt throughout the coatings, construction and abrasive blasting industries. Indeed, the death of a painter and blaster from silicosis figures prominently in a new OSHA video, "Deadly Dust," produced to support the silica proposal.

Workers are exposed to airborne respirable silica dust particles through cutting, sawing, drilling and crushing of concrete, brick, block and other stone products and in operations using sand products, such as in glass manufacturing, foundries and abrasive blasting.

Bill Ellis
"Deadly Dust"

A new OSHA video about silica features the story of Bill Ellis, a painter and blaster who died of silicosis from occupational exposure to the mineral.

More than two million American workers are currently exposed to respirable crystalline silica, according to OSHA. More than 640,000 are believed to be exposed at levels that exceed the current PELs, the agency says.

Employer Opposition

The Construction Industry Safety Coalition represents thousands of employers in home building, road repair, heavy industrial production, specialty trades and materials supply.

The American Coatings Association, which represents manufacturers, was not part of the initial coalition and has not issued a statement on the silica proposal.

The Safety Coalition says the proposed rules will cost the construction industry $1 billion a year and is calling for a "feasible and cost-effective" alternative.

“We need practical, science-based solutions that protect workers in all facets of construction,” said Rick Judson, chairman of the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), an association member of the coalition.

Rick Judson E. Colette Nelson
NAHB (left); Twitter

NAHB chairman Rick Judson says the current silica proposal is impractical. The ASA's E. Colette Nelson says the plan will affect tens of thousands of specialty trade contractors.

“Unfortunately, OSHA’s initial announcement about this proposed rule indicates we aren’t there yet,” Judson said in an announcement.

Subcontractors Speak Out

The American Subcontractors Association, another coalition member, has also assailed the proposal as "confusing and burdensome."

“OSHA’s proposed rule runs 577 pages and details the steps that tens of thousands of specialty trade contractors will have to follow in order to be in compliance,” ASA Chief Advocacy Officer E. Colette Nelson said in a statement.

ASA has developed a Special Report on the OSHA Proposed Rule on Crystalline Silica for its members.

In addition to NAHB and ASA, the coalition is composed of:

  • Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC);
  • Associated General Contractors of America (AGC);
  • Association of the Wall and Ceiling Industry (AWCI);
  • American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA);
  • International Council of Employers of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers (ICE);
  • Mason Contractors Association of America (MCAA);
  • Mechanical Contractors Association of America (MCA);
  • National Electrical Contractors Association (NECA); and
  • National Roofing Contractors Association (NRCA).

Asphalt Industry is Ready

One group that has long prepared for the silica proposal is the National Asphalt Pavement Association (NAPA), which has nearly 1,200 member companies. In a statement issued last week, the association said the asphalt industry was "positioned to meet the new standard."

NAPA
NAPA

The National Asphalt Pavement Association says it has been working for a decade to prepare for the rule and has devised simple equipment retrofits to meet the new limits.

The group notes that silica is a "known carcinogen" and says it has been partnering for a decade with milling machine manufacturers, labor, academia and the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) to reduce silica exposure.

The asphalt group says its Silica/Milling Machine Partnership has identified "simple retrofits for existing milling machines that effectively reduce potential silica exposure below OSHA’s new proposed PEL."

NAPA says it will offer suggestions during the public comment process on the proposal "to help better calibrate the rule to the industry's exposure potential."

"The Partnership is committed to doing the best work possible to ensure that workers are safe and that any silica exposure is reduced to the absolutely lowest level possible," said partnership chairman Tony Bodway, of Wisconsin-based Payne & Dolan Inc.

Labor: Fast Action Needed

Labor unions, meanwhile, call the proposed rule long overdue and are ready to fight for it.

The AFL-CIO, representing 57 unions and 12 million members, says a final silica rule "should be issued as fast as humanly possible, to protect the health and lives of American workers."

The union says 7,000 American workers develop silicosis each year and 200 die from the disease.

Richard Trumka Sean McGarvey
BCTD (left); AFL-CIO

AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka (left) says his unions "will do everything we can" to move the rule forward. The Building and Construction Trades Department, led by president Sean McGarvey (right), sounded equally resolute.

"Workers exposed to silica dust will only be protected when a final rule is issued," AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said in a statement.

He added: "Some industry groups are certain to attack the rule and try to stop it in its tracks. The AFL-CIO will do everything we can to see that this does not happen."

The two-million-member Building and Construction Trades Department, an alliance of 13 national and international unions, also voiced strong support.

statement by BCT called the release of the proposed rule "welcome news to the millions of workers at risk of exposure to dangerous levels of silica dust, those who already suffer from illnesses due to past exposures, and the families who have lost loved ones to silica-related illnesses."

   

Tagged categories: Abrasive blasting; American Subcontractors Association; Asphalt; Certifications and standards; Construction; Fatalities; Health and safety; Labor; National Association of Home Builders (NAHB); OSHA; Painting Contractor; Respirators; Roads/Highways; Silica; Workers

Comment from William Gusnard, (9/4/2013, 8:42 AM)

I work in the Power industry, and one of the main chemicals used in mercury removal is hydrated lime. It meets the current PEL for crystalline but it fails dramatically under the new proposed rules. The government has imposed these new regulations that are going the adversely affect other regulsations. My question is (even though I agree with the new regulations) is this, do the various regulation industries even talk to each other about their various proposals?


Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.

Abrasives Inc.
Check our Prices for Blast Abrasives

Faced with higher abrasive costs? We invite you to call & check our rates on Black Magic® coal slag and other quality blast materials. Abrasives Inc. 800-584-7524


CS Unitec
Surface Prep Tools for Hazardous Conditions

CS Unitec's Trelawny™
line of surface prep tools
is safe and efficient for
use in marine & protective coatings applications including Ex Zones & Hot Work Zones.


Novatek Corporation
Dustless Coatings Removal

Strip it, clean it, and profile it,
all dust free! High production
rates and Blast like finishes.
Comply with new lead
standards.


LS Industries
LS Blasters: Optimum Steel Cleaning Efficiency

Simplify surface prep with the precise shot control of LS Blasters. Our blast technology delivers optimum coverage and finish. 800-533-8008


Stable Lead (maker of FESI-BOND)
The ultimate lead stabilizing blast additive.

Stable Lead’s FESI-BOND BLAST X1, the only green, nontoxic, lead stabilizing additive in the abrasive blast and paint industry; X1 is transforming our industry!


US Minerals
US Minerals -
Black Magnum

With nationwide production and distribution capabilities, U.S. Minerals supplies a complete range of coal slag and other abrasives to meet all of your blasting needs.


Absolute Equipment/Grand Rental Station
Portable Power from Absolute Equipment

•Compressors
•Lighting Systems
•Generators
•Light Compaction
Sales • Rental • Service
Call 1-866-931-6655
Over a century of
providing excellence.

 
 
 
Technology Publishing

The Technology Publishing Network

The Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings (JPCL) PaintSquare
Durability + Design Paint BidTracker JPCL Europe

 
EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About PaintSquare.com   |   Privacy policy   |   Terms & conditions   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us
 

© Copyright 2000-2014, Technology Publishing / PaintSquare, All rights reserved
2100 Wharton Street, Suite 310, Pittsburgh PA 15203-1951; Tel 1-412-431-8300; Fax 1-412-431-5428; E-mail webmaster@paintsquare.com