PaintSquare.com
Follow us on Twitter Follow us on LinkedIn Like us on Facebook Follow us on Instagram Visit the TPC Store
Search the site

 

Advertisement

PaintSquare


Coatings Industry News

Main News Page


More Cracks Found at Nuke Plant

Wednesday, September 25, 2013

Comment | More

The owner of an Ohio nuclear plant with a cracked concrete shield building says that it has found new cracks in the structure and that some of the old cracks have lengthened.

However, the building at the Davis-Bessee Nuclear Power Station "continues to maintain its structural integrity and ability to safely perform its functions," operator FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) reported in a release Sept. 20.

FENOC said the cracks had been discovered on a "routine inspection."

Cracked History

The 2.5-foot-thick, 250-foot-tall, reinforced concrete shield building surrounds a 1.5-foot-thick steel containment vessel that encloses the station's reactor about 21 miles outside Toledo. The containment vessel and the shield are 4.5 feet apart.

Davis-Besse Nuclear Plant
Photos: NRC

Uncoated since 1970, the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Shield Building recently received a protective coating after cracks in the structure were found.

The shield building was the only above-grade structure at Davis-Besse that was not sprayed with a white cement Thoroseal finish to seal the exterior concrete surface before the facility went online in 1970. Project builder Bechtel says no coating was required at the time.

However, both FENOC and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission now agree that the lack of coating (along with some design problems) left the structure vulnerable to weathering that caused cracking beginning during the harsh winter of 1978.

The cracking first came to light in 2011, when FirstEnergy reported to the NRC that workers had found the cracks during a shutdown to replace the reactor vessel head. The replacement project, which shut down the plant for two years, followed the 2002 discovery of a football-sized hole caused by corrosion.

The cracks raised concerns among regulators that came to light only later.

Since the problem was discovered, the shield building has been coated with a protective coating, and FENOC has established a long-term inspection program to monitor the building.

3 New Cracks

The new inspection regimen apparently led to the new discovery of cracking issues.

Cracks at Davis-Besse

The subsurface cracking was documented in Nuclear Regulatory Commission photos taken in late 2011 and in core bore samples from the Shield Building.

FENOC said its "high-definition camera technology" allows "examination inside of the building's walls through a series of inspection ports—or core bores."

The new camera "provides greater clarity and mobility than previously available equipment," FENOC said.

The company has examined 43 of the shield building's 82 core bores, with the remaining examinations expected to be complete in the next several weeks.

"The improved camera has identified three very tight, subsurface pre-existing cracks in the building that were not visible with previous inspection technology," FENOC said.

"These inspections also have found that in three locations, cracks initially identified in 2011 appear to have propagated a small amount."

License Extension Sought

The cracks have become an issue in the operator’s application for a 20-year extension on the plant’s license, which is due to expire in 2017.

Davis-Besse Site Vice President Ray Lieb said the inspection results thus far "confirms the 2011 conclusion that the shield building's structural integrity is not impacted by the presence of these tight cracks."

He added: "The robust building continues to function safely and reliably. Long-term safe, reliable operation of the plant is our number one goal."

   

Tagged categories: Bechtel; Concrete defects; Cracks; Exposure conditions; Exterior coatings; Nuclear Power Plants; Power Plants; Protective coatings; Weathering

Comment from Chuck Pease, (9/26/2013, 7:50 PM)

Bolderdash, the shell is cracking but no worries Mom and Pop public. Whatever. The bigger the lie the more they will believe!!!


Comment from Chuck Pease, (9/26/2013, 7:51 PM)

Forgot to mention this is not an isolated incident. The containment structures at several other nuke plants are having the same issues. Seabrook anyone?


Comment from Jim Johnson, (9/30/2013, 6:43 PM)

I am not against nuke plants. Power can be generated efficiently and safely. The US Navy has been using nuclear power in vessels for over 50 years safely, so it can be done. I have quite a bit of faith in the NRC to keep them operating safely. What I see is the NRC forms judgements based upon the reports sent in by the operators. The problem is that these operators do not always fill out the reports honestly, thereby allowing problem situations to go unnoticed.


Comment from Chuck Pease, (9/30/2013, 7:54 PM)

And there in lies the problem. I'm not anti nuke either. What I am agaisnt is when we have no regulation that works effectively to protect everyone within range of the plants. Rememeber the 08 banking meltdown? Same crap!!1 Have the fox watching the henhouse.


Comment from John Fauth, (10/2/2013, 8:48 AM)

We live under the illusion that safety can be achieved with enough government. Ain't gonna happen.


Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.

Advertisements
 
Industrial Vacuum Equipment Corp.
 
Hurricane Vacuums
& Dust Collectors
 
Vacuum and dust collector hose, filters and related accessories.
IndustrialVacuum.com
 

 
SABRE Autonomous Solutions
 
Safety
 
Removing blasting operators from harmful environments is our key objective.
 

 
Waterjet Technology Association (WJTA)
 
Click to register today!
 
See the latest automated and handheld UHP waterblasting tools/systems/products. Exhibits, live demos, educational sessions, waterjet short course, networking.
 

 
SEMicro Division, M.E. Taylor Engineering, Inc.
 
Coatings Adhesion Testers
 
The PATTI® accurately measures the bond strength between coating & substrate. Outfitted properly, the surface can be rough, porous, or curved & >10K psi strong!
 

 
SSPC: The Society for Protective Coatings
 
http://www.sspc.org/
 
Join SSPC and Enhance
Your Career !
 

 
Detail Masters
 
Overspray Removal
 
We offer professional, turnkey service and unparalleled quality!
Our process can save hundreds— even thousands of dollars. It's fast, environmentally safe and 100% guaranteed.
 

 
W Abrasives
 
Optimize your blasting process and operations!
 
Blasting is a complex process that goes above and beyond the simple question of the shot used, no matter how innovative and efficient it is. W Abrasives is there to help.
 

 
Jotun Paints Inc.
 
Jotun Jotachar 1709
 
Mesh-free passive fire protection epoxy designed to protect against hydrocarbon pool fire scenarios for up to four hours as defined in the ANSI/UL1709 standard.
 

 
Novatek Corporation
 
Novatek Corporation, Dustless Coatings Removal
 
Strip, clean and profile all dust free! Comply with new lead standards. Contact today: (866) 563-7800
 

 
Tnemec Company, Inc.
 
Cast Your Vote Now!
 
Tnemec’s annual Tank of the Year competition is accepting votes for the ‘People’s Choice’ water tank. Click above to learn more or to submit your ballot.
 

 
 
 

Technology Publishing Co., 1501 Reedsdale Street, Suite 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 15233

TEL 1-412-431-8300  • FAX  1-412-431-5428  •  EMAIL webmaster@paintsquare.com


The Technology Publishing Network

Durability + Design PaintSquare the Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings Paint BidTracker

 
EXPLORE:      JPCL   |   PaintSquare News   |   Interact   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   Resources   |   Classifieds
REGISTER AND SUBSCRIBE:      Free PaintSquare Registration   |   Subscribe to JPCL   |   Subscribe to PaintSquare News
MORE:      About PaintSquare.com   |   Privacy policy   |   Terms & conditions   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us